Deficiency Index

Deer's Head Center

Salisbury, Maryland · CCN 215132

14 surveys since 2010, 2 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
69
Surveys
14
Harm or worse
2
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2010–2025
’10’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse2

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file11/14

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
80
Ownership
Government - State
Chain
Independent
County
Wicomico
Medicare-certified since
1981

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
5
Staffing
5
Quality measures
3

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=15, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Dec 16, 2025

328 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day9.554.06
Registered-nurse hours per resident day4.58—
Annual nurse turnover30.6%33.7%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$41,265 across 1 penalty

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG15.3%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD1789.5%E—F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B15.3%C—
CMS’s current file: 19 of the 69 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6002×

    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.

  • F8802×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

  • F5501×

    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.

  • F5611×

    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.

  • F5781×

    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Deer's Head Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF600Jul 12, 2024

    Based on review of records, observation, and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to keep residents safe from physical and verbal abuse. This was evident for 4 (Residents #27, #2, #11, and #28) of 10 residents reviewed for abuse, one of which was determined to have sustained actual harm (Resident #27). The Findings include: 1) On 7/10/24 at 10:14 AM, the surveyor reviewed the facility's investigation of an incident that took place between Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) #36 and Resident #27. The review revealed that, on 5/30/23 at about 10:00 AM, GNA #36 was working with Resident #27 and was transporting him/her to the shower. During transport, the resident defecated onto the floor. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF578Dec 16, 2025

    Based on medical record review and interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that advance directives were discussed with residents and/or responsible representatives. This was found to be evident for 3 (Resident #5, #8 and #7) out of 6 residents reviewed for advance directives during the annual survey.The findings include: 1. An advance directive is a legal document that specifies a person's wishes for end-of-life healthcare. It also specifies who should make healthcare decisions on your behalf if you are unable to do so yourself. During a review of medical records for Resident #5 on [DATE] at 4:05 PM it was revealed that there was no advance directive in the medical records for Resident #5. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF600Dec 16, 2025

    Based on facility investigation, medical record review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to prevent an incident of resident-to-resident sexual abuse. This was evident for 1 (Resident #20) of 1 resident reviewed for abuse.The findings Include:Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) is a quick, standardized screening tool used primarily in healthcare, especially long-term care facilities, to assess cognitive function. Scores range from 0-15, with higher scores (13-15) indicating intact cognition, while lower scores suggest moderate (8-12) or severe (0-7) impairment.The facility's investigation related to Facility Reported Incident # 340863 was reviewed by the surveyor on 12/09/25 at 6:45 PM. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF757Dec 16, 2025

    Based on medical record review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate side effects monitoring for residents on psychotropic medications. This was evident for 2 (Resident #7 and #20) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications.The findings include:Psychotropic medications are drugs that affect the brain and central nervous system, altering mood, thoughts, perceptions, and behaviors. They are primarily used to treat mental health conditions, such as anxiety, depression, schizophrenia, and bipolar disorder.1) On 12/09/2025 at 6:00 PM a review of Resident #7's medical record revealed that he/she was admitted to the facility in March 2021 with diagnoses which included Major Depressive Disorder, Anxiety Disorder, Borderline Personality Disorder and… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF812Dec 16, 2025

    Based on observations, interviews and record reviews it was determined that the facility failed to store food in a manner that maintains professional standards of food service safety. This practice had the potential to affect all residents eating food prepared by the facility's kitchen. The findings include:During the initial tour of the Kitchen with the Dietary Manager on 12/08/25 at 9:11 AM there were foods found opened, unlabeled and foods kept past the best by dates. The following foods were identified: In the Walk-in Freezer the following items were found: 1. A clear bag of burger patties that had been opened and removed from the box was undated and unlabeled.2. A box of Oatmeal Raisin Frozen Cookie Dough had been opened with the bag left open to air and was not resealed. […]

Read 21 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 21 of 69 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Dec 16, 2025Standard7 findings
  • Jul 12, 2024Standard and complaint8 findings · 1 harm
  • Sep 5, 2019Standard and complaint8 findings
  • Jul 12, 2018Standard3 findings
  • Apr 14, 2017Standard and complaint6 findings
  • Jan 8, 2016Standard and complaint4 findings
  • Jun 25, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 17, 2014Standard and complaint8 findings
Show the 6 earlier surveys
  • Nov 8, 2013—12 findings
  • Nov 7, 2012—1 finding
  • Sep 27, 2012—4 findings
  • Sep 1, 2011—3 findings
  • Sep 9, 2010—1 finding · 1 harm
  • Jul 21, 2010—3 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction