Daviess County Nursing and Rehabilitation
Gallatin, Missouri · CCN 265729
23 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2018.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 80
- Surveys
- 23
- Harm or worse
- 3
- Immediate jeopardy
- 1
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 97
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Daviess · rural
- Medicare-certified since
- 2002
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 3
- Health inspection
- 3
- Staffing
- 2
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 113 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Missouri.
Last survey on record
Jun 25, 2026
137 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.11 | 3.32 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.35 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 52.1% | 60.2% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D525.0% | E1365.0% | F210.0% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F8123×
Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
- F6952×
Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
- F5581×
Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
- F5781×
Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
- F6001×
Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Daviess County Nursing and Rehabilitation, in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF801Jan 26, 2024
Based on interviews and facility document review, the facility failed to employ a dietary manager (DM) with the appropriate qualifications to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition services in 1 of 1 kitchen, providing nutrition services to all residents in the facility. Review of a facility document titled Job Description, dated November 2007, for the position of Director of Food Service/Dietary Manager, in the section titled Qualifications/ Education and Training revealed, Candidate must possess a high school diploma or equivalent. Must have completed the Dietary Manager Course. Sanitation certification through the State or County Health Department required. Certification for Food Protection through the Dietary Manager Course preferred. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Jan 26, 2024
Based on observations, interviews, and facility document review, the facility failed to prepare food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Specifically, the stove vent hood was covered with buildup in 1 of 1 kitchen providing nutrition services to all residents in the facility. Observation made during the initial tour of the kitchen on 01/23/2024 at 9:04 AM revealed the vent hood over the stove was covered with a gray fuzzy substance. During an interview on 01/23/2024 at 9:20 AM, the Dietary Manager (DM) said that there was dust buildup on the vents over the stove. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF689Jun 25, 2026
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision to prevent elopement for one resident, Resident #44, failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent falls for Resident #10, and failed to provide safe transfers for Resident #10 and Resident #31. This affected three of 14 sampled residents. The facility census was 55.Review of the facility's Wandering and Elopement Policy dated 03/2019 showed:-Facility will identify residents who are at risk of unsafe wandering and strive to prevent harm;-Residents identified as high risk for elopement, the resident's care plan will have strategies and interventions to maintain resident safety;-Any time a resident elopes, the attending physician and legal representative are notified. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF658Apr 25, 2025
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure professional standards of quality when staff failed to obtain a physician's order, obtain authorization from the resident's representative, complete and assessment for use of chair alarm for three residents (Resident #32, #17, and #24). The facility census was 58. Review of facility policy, physical restraints, dated April 2006, showed: -Physical restraints are defined as any manual method or physical or mechanical device, material, or equipment attached or adjacent to the resident's body that the individual cannot remove easily, which restricts freedom of movement or normal access to one's body. -Assess resident's need for restraint use. -Obtain physician's order for restraint. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF679Apr 25, 2025
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an on-going program of activities that was designed to meet the interests and physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. This affected five residents (#48, #4, #17, #11 and #23) out of 15 sampled residents and could potentially affect all residents. The facility census was 58. Review of the facility policy, Preparation for Activities, dated 6/2018, showed the Activity Director was responsible for the scheduling of all activity functions; The facility did not provide activity participation records for requested residents. 1. […]
Read 23 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 23 of 80 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jun 25, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Apr 25, 2025Standard8 findings
- Jan 26, 2024Standard4 findings
- Sep 25, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Feb 16, 2022Standard6 findings
- Mar 10, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Oct 8, 2020Complaint1 finding
- Jun 3, 2020Infection control1 finding
Show the 15 earlier surveys
- Dec 12, 2019Standard3 findings
- Jul 30, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Jan 15, 2019Standard16 findings · 2 harm
- Aug 17, 2018Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Nov 16, 2017Standard5 findings
- Oct 20, 2016Standard5 findings
- Dec 3, 2015Standard1 finding
- Oct 16, 2014Standard1 finding
- May 2, 2014Complaint1 finding
- Sep 6, 2013—4 findings
- Sep 6, 2012—10 findings
- Oct 27, 2011—5 findings
- Jul 5, 2011—1 finding
- May 25, 2011—2 findings
- Jan 3, 2011—1 finding
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
- Arrowhead Senior Living CommunityOsage Beachno harm findings
- Oak Knoll Skilled Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterFergusonno harm findings
- Clearview Nursing CenterSikestonno harm findings
- Heisinger Bluffs Healthcare Western CampusJefferson Cityno harm findings
- Camelot Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterFarmington3 harm findings
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction