Deficiency Index

D'Youville Senior Care

Lowell, Massachusetts · CCN 225515

29 surveys since 2010, 6 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
113
Surveys
29
Harm or worse
6
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2010–2026
’10’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse6

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file20/29

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
208
Ownership
Non profit - Corporation
Chain
Independent
County
Middlesex
Medicare-certified since
1990

CMS ratings

Overall
1
Health inspection
1
Staffing
3
Quality measures
3

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 36 not-for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in Massachusetts.

Last survey on record

Jun 29, 2026

133 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.793.89
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.20—
Annual nurse turnover36.4%37.5%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG12.0%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD4080.0%E918.0%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 50 of the 113 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6585×

    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.

  • F6563×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

  • F7613×

    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.

  • F8423×

    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.

  • F8803×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at D'Youville Senior Care, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, patternF692Mar 11, 2022

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status by providing adequate interventions to maintain usual body weight and prevent significant weight loss or gain, for 6 Residents (#1, #40, #127, #178, #121 and #27) out of a total sample of 36 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Weight Monitoring, last revised 6/2021, indicated the following: *All residents/patients will be weighed within 24 hours of admission or re-admission, then daily times 3 days. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Apr 13, 2023

    Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to 1. prevent a fall that resulted in facial fractures for Resident (#137) and 2. implement chair sensors for safety for Resident (#64) out of a total sample of 37 Residents. 1. For Resident #137, the facility failed to provide the required two person assist with a transfer, resulting in a fall with facial fractures. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Fall Prevention/Reduction Program dated and revised on 2/2023 indicated the following: *The falls prevention/reduction program is designed to ensure a safe environment for all residents based on identified risk factors with continuous assessment and evaluation to maintain their safety, comfort, mental and physical wellbeing, with the respect to… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF695Apr 15, 2026

    Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that respiratory care and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, were provided for four Residents (#175, #139, #93 and #143) out of a total sample of 40 Residents. Specifically,For Resident #175 the facility failed to a). ensure that they obtained physician's orders for the use of CPAP (continuous positive airway pressure, used to treat obstructive sleep apnea) and b). store the CPAP mask and tubing in a bag.For Resident #139, Resident #93, and Resident #143, the facility failed to ensure the respiratory equipment was maintained in a sanitary condition. Specifically, the oxygen concentrators used to administer continuous oxygen had filters covered with a thick layer of dust. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF761Apr 15, 2026

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure staff stored drugs and biologicals in accordance with State and Federal requirements. Specifically,1. For Resident #69 the facility failed to ensure medications were not stored at the bedside. 2. For Resident #175 the facility failed to ensure medications were not stored at the bedside.3a. The facility failed to ensure the treatment cart on the Sweet Land Unit was locked.3b. The facility failed to ensure the medication carts on the Sweet Land Unit, Short Term Rehab Unit and Wannalancit Unit were secured.Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Medication Storage in the Facility Bedside Medication Storage, dated 2024, indicated All nurses and aides are required to report to the charge nurse on… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF880Apr 15, 2026

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Specifically,The facility failed to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for five residents (#2, #48, #143, #33, and #183) out of a total of 69 residents who required the use of EBP.The facility failed to follow proper infection control practices for shared medical equipment, a). Nursing Staff failed to disinfect the blood pressure cuff between uses on the Sweet Land Unit and [NAME] Unit, and b). […]

Read 26 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 26 of 113 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jun 29, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 15, 2026Standard15 findings
  • Feb 17, 2026Complaint2 findings
  • Jan 13, 2026Complaint3 findings
  • Dec 4, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 11, 2025Standard9 findings
  • Aug 21, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • May 31, 2024Standard9 findings
Show the 21 earlier surveys
  • Apr 13, 2023Standard9 findings · 1 harm
  • Feb 7, 2023Infection control1 finding
  • Mar 11, 2022Standard16 findings · 1 harm
  • Jan 12, 2022Infection control1 finding
  • Nov 19, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Nov 10, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Oct 27, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 2, 2019Standard3 findings
  • Aug 27, 2018Standard7 findings
  • Dec 11, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 30, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • May 23, 2017Standard6 findings
  • Jan 18, 2017Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Jun 21, 2016Standard4 findings
  • Mar 19, 2015Standard1 finding
  • Sep 16, 2014Complaint2 findings
  • Jan 31, 2014Standard11 findings · 1 harm
  • Apr 8, 2013—1 finding
  • Nov 15, 2012—1 finding
  • Sep 7, 2012—1 finding · 1 harm
  • Sep 15, 2010—2 findings · 1 harm

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction