Deficiency Index

Cura of Melrose

Melrose, Minnesota · CCN 245396

22 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2025.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
67
Surveys
22
Harm or worse
5
Immediate jeopardyall corrected before survey
1
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy1

Findings at the most serious level CMS records. All were recorded as past non-compliance — corrected before the survey.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file13/22

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
75
Ownership
Non profit - Corporation
Chain
CURA
County
Stearns
Medicare-certified since
1986

CMS ratings

Overall
2
Health inspection
2
Staffing
4
Quality measures
2

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 52 not-for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Minnesota.

Last survey on record

Jul 8, 2026

124 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.024.39
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.72—
Annual nurse turnover57.2%37.0%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$49,585 across 2 penalties
Payment denials
1
Abuse icon
Flagged by CMS on Care Compare

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ15.9%K—L—
Actual harmG423.5%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD1164.7%E15.9%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 17 of the 67 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6893×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

  • F8802×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

  • F5501×

    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.

  • F5521×

    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.

  • F5801×

    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Cura of Melrose, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Jul 8, 2026

    Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent the elopement for 1 of 1 residents (R1) reviewed who was identified as an elopement risk, required a WanderGuard (a wireless wander management system to prevent residents from wandering or eloping. It uses a wearable bracelet paired with door sensors to trigger instant alarms if a resident approaches an exit) device and had exit-seeking behaviors. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) when R1's WanderGuard device alarmed as she exited the building and staff responded by turning off the alarm without investigating who exited the door, she left the facility and independently ambulated approximately four blocks from the facility before being found, which placed R1 at likelihood for… […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF600May 14, 2026

    Based on interview and document review the facility failed to protect 2 of 2 residents (R2 and R1) from abuse. Staff used a personal cell phone to take a picture of R2's soiled brief, buttocks, and large bowel movement and the picture was sent to several other facility staff. This resulted in actual harm to R2 as she verbalized not trusting facility staff and was fearful to have a bowel movement. R1 was abused when staff used their personal cell phone to record R1's voice as she was repeatedly stating, help me, help me. The video was sent to several facility staff phones with the caption, I want to kill myself. The facility implemented corrective action, and the deficient practice was corrected on 5/08/26, prior to the survey, and was issued at past non-compliance. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Jan 14, 2026

    Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to protect 1 of 4 residents (R1) from avoidable accidents when care plan interventions were not implemented. This resulted in actual harm to R1 who fell out of a recliner and sustained a large hematoma (a solid swelling of clotted blood) and laceration to the front of her head.Findings include: R1's admission Record indicated she admitted to the facility 8/26/24. R1's diagnosis included dementia, depression, overactive bladder and osteoporosis. R1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified intact cognition and indicated she required substantial to maximal assistance for transfers and toileting. R1's care plan revised 12/19/25, identified a potential for injury related to a history of falls. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Dec 4, 2025

    Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to ensure the care plan was followed during staff assisted transfer for 1 of 3 residents (R1), who fell while being transferred. This resulted in actual harm when R1 sustained a fracture. Due to actions taken by the facility, following the fall, this is being issued at past non-compliance.Findings include:R1's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R1 had diagnoses which included Alzheimer's disease, vascular dementia with psychotic disturbance, age related osteoporosis, and R1 had moderately impaired cognition.R1's care plan revised on 12/1/25, indicated R1 had a self care deficit related to impaired mobility, Alzheimer's disease, depression, and a change in condition related to unknown… […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF686Jul 29, 2025

    Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to provide care consistent with professional standard of practice to prevent worsening of pressure ulcer identified on 6/20/25 for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed when the facility failed to provide appropriate assessment and treatment. This resulted in actual harm to R1 when she was identified with stage 3 pressure ulcer at coccyx area during admission at the hospital on 7/15/25. Findings include: According to the State Operations Manual, Appendix PP, Guidance to Surveyors for Long Term Care Facilities, revision 229, issued 4/25/25 a pressure ulcer and stage 3 pressure ulcer is defined as Pressure Ulcer/Injury (PU/PI) refers to localized damage to the skin and/or underlying soft tissue usually over a bony prominence… […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 67 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jul 8, 2026Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • May 14, 2026Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Jan 14, 2026Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Dec 4, 2025Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Sep 11, 2025Standard5 findings
  • Jul 29, 2025Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Apr 28, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 29, 2024Standard and complaint2 findings
Show the 14 earlier surveys
  • Aug 10, 2023Standard1 finding
  • Sep 22, 2022Standard2 findings
  • Jun 28, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 8, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Jul 14, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 15, 2019Standard and complaint7 findings
  • Jun 28, 2018Standard5 findings
  • Apr 13, 2017Standard2 findings
  • Jun 30, 2016Standard3 findings
  • Apr 23, 2015Standard4 findings
  • May 16, 2014Standard6 findings
  • Mar 28, 2013—5 findings
  • Feb 9, 2012—7 findings
  • Mar 31, 2011—6 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction