Deficiency Index

Cura of Long Prairie

Long Prairie, Minnesota · CCN 245244

13 surveys since 2012. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2018.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
56
Surveys
13
Harm or worse
2
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2012–2026
’12’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse2

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file10/13

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
60
Ownership
Non profit - Corporation
Chain
CURA
County
Todd · rural
Medicare-certified since
1981

CMS ratings

Overall
4
Health inspection
5
Staffing
1
Quality measures
2

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=10, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Apr 9, 2026

214 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD685.7%E114.3%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 7 of the 56 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Cura of Long Prairie, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF851Jan 9, 2024

    Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to submit accurate and/or complete data for staffing information based on payroll during 1 of 1 quarters (Quarter 4) reviewed, to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), according to specifications established by CMS. Findings include: Payroll Based Journal (PBJ), [NAME] Report 1705D indicated the facility had excessively low weekend staffing during quarter 4 of fiscal year 2023, which included dates between July 1 to September 30th. Daily staff schedules during quarter 4 indicated adequate staff on weekends. During interview on 1/9/24 at 10:31 a.m., director of nursing (DON) stated weekly schedules were created by either the DON or Administrator. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF550Apr 9, 2026

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure call lights were answered in a timely manner to promote dignity for 4 of 4 residents (R3, R4, R5, R6 ) reviewed for complaints of long call light wait times.Findings include: R3R3's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R3's cognition was intact, minimal bilateral hearing loss, utilized hearing aids, and had no behaviors. R3 had limited impairment with range of motion of the upper one side extremity and used a walker and wheelchair for mobility. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF800Aug 5, 2021

    Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure all items on room trays were covered for 6 of 8 food trays observed on one cart during delivery of dinner to residents. This had the potential to affect 6 of 8 residents that received food trays from the cart. Findings include: On 8/2/21, at 5:31 p.m. dietary aide (DA)-A was preparing meal trays to be delivered to resident rooms. The main entree was scooped onto the plate by the dietary server, from the steam table, covered with a dome lid and handed to DA-A. The covered plates were placed on each tray with beverages and applesauce, and the trays were placed onto a metal four-shelved cart, with two trays on each shelf. DA-A then placed a white bath towel over the two trays on the first cart shelf. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF880May 1, 2025

    Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure proper personal protective equipment (PPE) was used when providing cares for 1 of 1 residents (R24) reviewed for enhanced barrier precautions (EBP). Findings Include: R24's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated moderate cognitive impairment and one unhealed stage two pressure ulcer and a skin tear. R24's undated care plan included R24 was on EBP to prevent the spread of multi drug resistant organisms (MDRO). The care plan instructed to use gown and gloves with high-contact resident care activities. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF583Jan 9, 2024

    Based on observation, interview, and record reviews facility failed to protect personal health information for 2 of 2 residents (R11 & R34) related to code status. Finding include: R34's annual minnimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated severely impaired cognition, and diagnoses of Parkinson's disease (Unable to control movements), malnutrition (poor nutrition), atrial fibrillation (irregular heartbeat), and hypertension (high blood pressure). R11's quarterly MDS dated [DATE], indicated intact cognition, diagnoses of anemia (low iron), hypertension (high blood pressure), renal insufficiency (poor kidney function), and hemiplegia (reduced function of one side). […]

Read 21 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 21 of 56 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Apr 9, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • May 1, 2025Standard1 finding
  • Jan 9, 2024Standard6 findings
  • Aug 5, 2021Standard2 findings
  • Nov 13, 2019Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Jul 15, 2019Standard9 findings
  • Sep 13, 2018Standard and complaint8 findings · 1 harm
  • Aug 2, 2017Standard6 findings
Show the 5 earlier surveys
  • Jun 30, 2016Standard6 findings
  • May 21, 2015Standard3 findings
  • May 8, 2014Standard2 findings
  • Jun 6, 2013—6 findings
  • Sep 6, 2012—5 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction