Deficiency Index

Central Todd County Care Center

Clarissa, Minnesota · CCN 245521

19 surveys since 2010, 8 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
53
Surveys
19
Harm or worse
8
Immediate jeopardy
1
The record, 2010–2026
’10’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy1

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file17/19

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
45
Ownership
Non profit - Corporation
Chain
Independent
County
Todd · rural
Medicare-certified since
1988

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
4
Staffing
5
Quality measures
2

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=9, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Mar 18, 2026

236 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.564.22
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.77—
Annual nurse turnover32.8%42.1%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG120.0%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD360.0%E120.0%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 5 of the 53 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Central Todd County Care Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Oct 29, 2025

    Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to implement standards of practice to ensure a safe transfer for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for accidents when staff failed to use a transfer belt. This resulted in actual harm when R1 fell during a staff assisted transfer, sustained a fractured and dislocated left arm, multiple rib fractures and was sent to the emergency department (ED) requiring medical treatment and kept overnight for observation and pain control. Findings include: R1's quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], identified she was admitted to the facility on [DATE], from home/community. R1 had severe cognitive impairment with disorganized thinking, without behaviors and required substantial/maximal assistance with all transfers. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF610Oct 29, 2025

    Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to conduct a comprehensive, complete investigation,, including a root cause analysis (RCA) and provide sufficient protection to other residents while the investigation was completed for 1 of 3 residents (R1) who was reviewed for accidents. This had the potential to affect all 19 residents who required staff assistance with a gait belt to transfer.Findings include: R1's quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], identified she was admitted to the facility on [DATE], from home/community. She had severely impaired cognition with disorganized thinking, without behaviors. She required substantial/maximal assistance with all transfers. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Aug 5, 2021

    Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure expired and/or outdated food products, including both dry stock and refrigerated items, were removed from rotation and not available for resident use or consumption which could cause potential foodborne illness. This had potential to affect 30 of 43 residents identified who could receive these items. Findings include: On [DATE], at 9:35 a.m. the main production kitchen was toured. A dry storage area was located adjacent to the kitchen which contained metallic shelving and various items available to resident food use or preparation. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF558Mar 18, 2026

    Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's call light was accessible for 1 of 1 residents (R15) reviewed for call light accessibility. Findings include: R15's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R15 had severely impaired cognition and had a diagnosis that included Alzheimer's disease (disease that cause dementia), non-Alzheimer's dementia. R15 needed maximal assistance with toileting and touching assistance with transfers. R15's care plan revised on 1/15/26, identified R15 was at risk for falls, and staff were to reinforce the need to call for assistance. R15's fall safety assessment dated [DATE], identified R15 of having a moderate risk for falls. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF880Mar 18, 2026

    Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) were implemented in accordance with Centers for Disease Control (CDC) guidelines for 1 of 2 (R19) residents who were reviewed for enhanced barrier precautions. Findings include: Review of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance dated 4/1/24, Implementation of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) Use in Nursing Homes to Prevent Spread of Multidrug-resistant Organisms (MDROs) indicated Examples of high-contact resident care activities requiring gown and glove use for Enhanced Barrier Precautions included: dressing, bathing/showering, transferring, providing hygiene, changing linens, changing briefs or assisting with toileting, device care or use: central… […]

Read 26 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 26 of 53 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Mar 18, 2026Standard2 findings
  • Oct 29, 2025Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
  • Aug 5, 2021Standard4 findings
  • Apr 15, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Apr 18, 2019Standard3 findings
  • Feb 4, 2019Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Mar 9, 2018Standard6 findings
  • Jan 5, 2017Standard7 findings
Show the 11 earlier surveys
  • Mar 10, 2016Standard3 findings
  • Jul 16, 2015Standard3 findings
  • Jan 8, 2015Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Aug 27, 2014Standard3 findings
  • Jan 15, 2013—2 findings · 1 harm
  • Aug 2, 2012—2 findings
  • Sep 16, 2011—6 findings
  • Sep 14, 2010—2 findings · 1 harm
  • Aug 5, 2010—2 findings · 1 harm
  • Jul 13, 2010—1 finding · 1 harm
  • Jun 22, 2010—1 finding · 1 harm

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction