Deficiency Index

Creekside Village

Mishawaka, Indiana · CCN 155784

37 surveys since 2011, 8 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
149
Surveys
37
Harm or worse
8
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse8

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file29/37

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
100
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
AMERICAN SENIOR COMMUNITIES
County
St. Joseph
Medicare-certified since
2010

CMS ratings

Overall
4
Health inspection
3
Staffing
2
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 67 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in Indiana.

Last survey on record

Jul 13, 2026

119 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.683.43
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.33—
Annual nurse turnover35.3%48.6%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD24100.0%E—F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 24 of the 149 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6843×

    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

  • F6952×

    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.

  • F7612×

    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.

  • F5801×

    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.

  • F6021×

    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Creekside Village, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF686Dec 2, 2022

    Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to identify a pressure ulcer on admission and provide a treatment for the pressure for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. (Resident 224) Finding includes: A clinical record review of Resident 224 was completed on 11/30/2022 at 8:34 A.M. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to: acute cystitis, dementia, diabetes mellitus type 2, and peripheral vascular disease. A Clinical Hospital Rehabilitation Record on 10/27/2022 at 1:44 P.M., indicated, an unstageable pressure ulcer to the sacrum. The measurements were 1.6 centimeters by 0.8 centimeters by 0.1 centimeters. The pressure ulcer was not staged due to necrotic tissue with 100 percent adherent yellow slough. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF684Dec 2, 2022

    Based on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to provide treatment for worsening skin integrity, proper physician ordered treatment for skin integrity, and lack of investigation and documentation for bruises with an improper transfer. (Residents 6, 5 & 28) Findings include: 1. During an initial interview with Resident 6, she indicated she had dry skin and picks at her skin especially when it is dry. She indicated her legs are dry, she had picked at her legs causing scabbing to both legs. Resident 6 indicated she had requested for lotion to be applied. A clinical record review was completed on 11/20/2022 at 3:16 P.M. for Resident 6. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF761Dec 2, 2022

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were labeled appropriately in 2 of 2 medication carts reviewed and failed to ensure non-pharmalogicals were stored appropriately for 1 of 1 medication carts and refrigerators reviewed. Findings include: 1. During an observation of the medication cart for the 400 unit, conducted on [DATE] at 2:21 P.M., the following was noted: There was an opened bottle of refresh tears eye drops for Resident 31 with an open date of [DATE], there was an opened inhaler for Resident 23 with an open date of [DATE]. During an interview with LPN 15 indicated she thought the eye drops and the inhaler medications expired after 45 days. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF684Jul 13, 2026

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication was administered as ordered by the physician for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for medication administration, (Resident B).Finding includes:Resident B's clinical record was reviewed on 7/13/26 at 10:04 A.M. Diagnoses included but were not limited to senile degeneration of brain, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, chronic kidney disease, cerebral cysts, and anxiety. Resident B was under the care of hospice services.Review of Resident B's physician orders included but were not limited to:Hydromorphone, take 1/2 of a 2 mg (1 mg) tablet by mouth two times daily between 7:00 A.M. and 11:00 A.M., and between 7:00 P.M. to 11:00 P.M., for Shortness of Breath or difficulty in breathing. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF658Mar 31, 2026

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff accurately administered physician ordered medications and treatments for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for standards of care. (Residents 1 and 18)Finding includes:1. During an observation on 3/25/2025 at 2:22 P.M. Resident 1's oxygen concentrator was dirty and dusty. The filter on the back of the concentrator had a clump of dust clinging to it. A record review for Resident 1 was completed on 3/27/2026 at 8:40 A.M. […]

Read 28 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 28 of 149 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jul 13, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 31, 2026Standard5 findings
  • Mar 21, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 13, 2025Standard6 findings
  • Jul 2, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 9, 2024Standard6 findings
  • Oct 6, 2023Complaint2 findings
  • Aug 18, 2023Complaint2 findings
Show the 29 earlier surveys
  • Dec 2, 2022Standard9 findings · 1 harm
  • May 26, 2022Infection control1 finding
  • Mar 25, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 14, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 7, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • May 8, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 26, 2019Standard3 findings
  • May 28, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • May 18, 2018Standard and complaint8 findings
  • Dec 18, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 22, 2017Complaint2 findings
  • Jun 16, 2017Complaint2 findings
  • May 11, 2017Standard18 findings
  • Apr 29, 2016Standard and complaint10 findings
  • Nov 16, 2015Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Aug 28, 2015Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
  • Apr 30, 2015Standard and complaint7 findings
  • Mar 19, 2015Complaint2 findings
  • May 14, 2014Complaint4 findings
  • Feb 21, 2013—14 findings · 2 harm
  • Sep 7, 2012—5 findings
  • May 30, 2012—6 findings · 1 harm
  • Apr 16, 2012—1 finding
  • Feb 23, 2012—1 finding
  • Feb 9, 2012—2 findings
  • Dec 12, 2011Standard14 findings
  • Aug 24, 2011—1 finding · 1 harm
  • Jun 8, 2011—3 findings
  • Apr 27, 2011—1 finding · 1 harm

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction