Deficiency Index

Crawford Care Center

Saegertown, Pennsylvania · CCN 395853

27 surveys since 2011, 5 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
141
Surveys
27
Harm or worse
5
Immediate jeopardy
2
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy2

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file18/27

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
157
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
ABRAHAM SMILOW
County
Crawford · rural
Medicare-certified since
1991

CMS ratings

Overall
1
Health inspection
1
Staffing
1
Quality measures
3

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 173 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in Pennsylvania.

Last survey on record

May 28, 2026

165 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.433.39
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.42—
Annual nurse turnover63.0%49.6%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$160,603 across 2 penalties

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ12.0%K12.0%L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD2752.9%E1937.3%F12.0%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B23.9%C—
CMS’s current file: 51 of the 141 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6564×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

  • F5613×

    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.

  • F6553×

    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted

  • F6843×

    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

  • F5782×

    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Crawford Care Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, patternF880Aug 2, 2024

    Based on observations, review of facility policies and documentation, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program by failing to follow infection control guidelines from the Pennsylvania Department of Health (PA DOH) to reduce the spread of infections and prevent cross-contamination during the COVID-19 pandemic. This failure placed the facility in an Immediate Jeopardy situation for 20 of 20 residents reviewed (Residents R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7, R8, R9, R10, R11, R12, R13, R14, R15, R16, R17, R18, R19, and R20). […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689May 28, 2026

    Based on review of facility policies, clinical records, facility documents, observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement sufficient monitoring and supervision to prevent elopement (when a resident leaves a safe care setting without staff knowledge) and failed to adequately implement search procedures related to an elopement. This failure placed residents at the facility in an Immediate Jeopardy situation for one of one residents reviewed (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled Elopements and Wandering Residents dated 1/22/26, indicated This facility ensures that residents who exhibit wandering behavior and/or are at risk for elopement receive adequate supervision. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Jun 15, 2023

    Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, and facility documentation and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide necessary precautionary measures to maintain resident safety and prevent injury during transport in a wheelchair resulting in actual harm of a fractured tibia for one of 18 residents reviewed (Resident R9). Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled Assistive Devices and Equipment dated 1/18/23, indicated, Residents, family, and visitors are trained, as indicated, on the safe use of equipment and devices and Staff practices-staff are required to demonstrate competency on the use of devices and equipment and are available to assist and supervise residents as needed. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Apr 17, 2025

    Based on observations, review of facility policies and International Plumbing Code, and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to safely store food containers, and prepare, serve and store food in a safe and sanitary manner in the main kitchen; failed to prevent the potential for cross contamination (transfer of harmful substances or disease-causing organisms to food from unclean hands or objects) during food preparation; and failed to maintain safe storage of ice for residents for one of one ice machines located in the kitchen. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF628Apr 30, 2026

    Based on review of facility policies, clinical records, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to provide the resident and/or resident representative with a written notice of the facility bed-hold policy (explanation of how long a bed can be held during a leave of absence and the cost per day), and failed to make certain that the necessary resident information was communicated to the receiving health care provider upon transfer to the hospital for five of five residents reviewed (Residents R2, R3, R5, R7, and R56). […]

Read 24 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 24 of 141 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • May 28, 2026Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Apr 30, 2026Standard and complaint13 findings
  • Apr 17, 2025Standard10 findings
  • Jan 6, 2025Complaint4 findings
  • Aug 14, 2024Complaint2 findings
  • Aug 2, 2024Complaint4 findings · 1 harm
  • May 3, 2024Standard12 findings
  • Apr 12, 2024Complaint3 findings
Show the 19 earlier surveys
  • Feb 8, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 15, 2023Standard4 findings · 1 harm
  • Feb 8, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 10, 2021Standard2 findings
  • Jan 17, 2020Standard2 findings
  • Dec 14, 2018Standard7 findings
  • Jan 11, 2018Standard3 findings
  • Jun 23, 2017Standard12 findings
  • Apr 14, 2017Complaint2 findings
  • Dec 15, 2016Standard5 findings
  • Dec 10, 2015Standard12 findings
  • Jul 9, 2015Complaint5 findings · 1 harm
  • Feb 27, 2015Standard8 findings
  • Dec 20, 2013—5 findings
  • Jan 11, 2013—6 findings
  • Dec 16, 2011—9 findings
  • Sep 13, 2011—2 findings · 1 harm
  • Mar 21, 2011—3 findings
  • Jan 28, 2011—2 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction