Deficiency Index

Countryside Estates

Warner, Oklahoma · CCN 375341

25 surveys since 2010, 19 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
160
Surveys
25
Harm or worse
19
Immediate jeopardy
6
The record, 2010–2026
’10’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy6

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file20/25

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
111
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
Independent
County
Muskogee · rural
Medicare-certified since
1998

CMS ratings

Overall
2
Health inspection
3
Staffing
1
Quality measures
2

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 94 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in Oklahoma.

Last survey on record

Jul 28, 2026

104 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.833.68
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.22—
Annual nurse turnover57.3%54.7%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$3,145 across 1 penalty

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD743.8%E743.8%F212.5%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 16 of the 160 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F5782×

    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.

  • F6562×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

  • F6041×

    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.

  • F6261×

    Permit a resident to return to the nursing home after hospitalization or therapeutic leave that exceeds bed-hold policy.

  • F6441×

    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Countryside Estates, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF882Jul 28, 2026

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a qualified employee was assigned to perform the duties of infection preventionist in the facility.The DON identified 76 residents resided in the facility. Findings:A policy titled Infection Preventionist, dated 07/2016, read in part, The Infection Preventionist is responsible for coordinating the implementation and updating of our established infection prevention and control policies and procedures.A facility employment record, dated 07/22/26, showed the infection preventionist had been terminated on 07/22/26 and their last day worked was 07/20/26.On 07/22/26 at 5:20 p.m., the administrator stated their infection preventionist had resigned that morning (07/22/26) via an email. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Oct 27, 2023

    Based on observation and interview the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. The DON documented 40 residents received meals from the kitchen. Findings: 1. On 10/19/23 at 9:21 a.m., an initial tour of the kitchen was conducted. A cut tomato in a sealed bad, dated 10/17/23, a cut up onion in a sealed bad, dated 10/13/23, and vegetable soup in a sealed container, dated 10/09/23 were observed in the refrigerator. On 10/19/23 at 9:30 a.m., Cook #1 entered the kitchen with a sack containing salad and other items. Cook #1 was not observed to wash their hands when they entered the kitchen. Cook #1 was observed to start dating the bags of salad and placing them in the refrigerator. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF578Jan 9, 2025

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were offered the right to formulate an advanced directive for five (#6, 12, 14, 31, and #35) of eight sampled residents reviewed for advanced directives. DON #1 identified 70 residents resided in the facility. Findings: 1. Res #6 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Res #6's medical record did not contain an advanced directive acknowledgement form. 2. Res #14 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Res #14's medical record did not contain an advanced directive acknowledgement form. 3. Res #31 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Res #31's medical record did not contain an advanced directive acknowledgement form. 46582 4. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF604Jan 9, 2025

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was assessed, a care plan was completed, and a physician order was obtained for the use of a physical restraint for one (#25) of one sampled resident reviewed for physical restraints. The ADON identified one resident who utilized a wheelchair lap seat belt. Findings: An undated Use of Restraints policy, read in parts, All restraints must have a physician's order and an order for evaluation by designee for the least restrictive device that is appropriate for the resident .Restraints shall be used only for safety or postural support of a resident to prevent injury to self or others .An assessment regarding the need of restraint for the resident will be completed and documented .The physician's… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF688Oct 27, 2023

    Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure residents with limited ROM received the appropriate treatment and services to increase ROM and/or to prevent further decrease in ROM for four (#12, 23, 53, and #69) of six residents reviewed for position/mobility. The DON documented 41 resident with contractures resided in the facility. Findings: 1. Res #23 had diabetes mellitus, cerebral palsy, CVA, and TIA. A quarterly assessment, dated 08/09/23, documented the resident was intact in cognition and required extensive assistance with ADLs. The assessment documented the resident had limited ROM of the upper and lower extremity on one side. A care plan, updated 09/18/23, documented the resident had limited mobility due to left side hemiparesis related to CVA. […]

Read 36 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 36 of 160 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jul 28, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 15, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 9, 2025Standard4 findings
  • Oct 27, 2023Standard7 findings
  • Feb 7, 2022Standard and complaint3 findings
  • Jul 27, 2021Infection control5 findings
  • May 20, 2021Infection control1 finding
  • Nov 29, 2018Standard1 finding
Show the 17 earlier surveys
  • May 15, 2018Complaint26 findings · 6 harm
  • Sep 5, 2017Standard3 findings
  • Jul 26, 2017Complaint4 findings · 1 harm
  • Apr 20, 2017Complaint2 findings
  • Mar 21, 2017Complaint5 findings · 2 harm
  • Feb 28, 2017Complaint5 findings · 2 harm
  • Jun 9, 2016Standard9 findings
  • Mar 27, 2015Standard18 findings
  • Nov 5, 2014Complaint4 findings · 1 harm
  • Feb 14, 2014Standard9 findings
  • Apr 11, 2013—18 findings · 3 harm
  • Oct 19, 2012—4 findings
  • Apr 3, 2012—2 findings
  • Jan 20, 2012—8 findings
  • Nov 17, 2011—4 findings · 1 harm
  • Mar 3, 2011—15 findings · 3 harm
  • Dec 17, 2010—1 finding

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction