Corn Heritage Village and Rehab
Corn, Oklahoma · CCN 375409
15 surveys since 2011, 9 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 92
- Surveys
- 15
- Harm or worse
- 9
- Immediate jeopardy
- 4
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 104
- Ownership
- Non profit - Church related
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Washita · rural
- Medicare-certified since
- 2002
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 1
- Health inspection
- 1
- Staffing
- 2
- Quality measures
- 2
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=12, floor 20).
Last survey on record
Nov 17, 2025
357 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.85 | 4.67 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.26 | — |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $50,622 across 1 penalty
- Payment denials
- 1
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J216.7% | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G18.3% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D325.0% | E650.0% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Corn Heritage Village and Rehab, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF684Nov 17, 2025
On 11/10/25 at 2:33 p.m., the OSDH was notified and verified the existence of an immediate jeopardy situation related to the facility's failure to ensure monitoring and intervention for Resident #3 who was on a routine long-term anticoagulant. This resulted in the resident being admitted to the ICU with an acute subdural hemorrhage after a fall.On 11/10/25 at 3:34 p.m., the administrator and interim executive director were notified of the immediate jeopardy and was provided the immediate jeopardy template. […]
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF726Nov 17, 2025
On 11/10/25 at 2:33 p.m., the OSDH was notified and verified the existence of an immediate jeopardy situation related to the facility's failure to ensure nursing staff were competent to effectively assess, monitor, and intervene for Resident #3 who was on a routine blood thinner and sustained a fall with injury causing an acute subdural hemorrhage resulting in being admitted to ICU.On 11/10/25 at 3:34 p.m., the administrator and interim executive director were notified of the immediate jeopardy and was provided the immediate jeopardy template. On 11/13/25 at 12:39 p.m., an acceptable plan of removal was approved by the Oklahoma State Department of Health. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF580Nov 17, 2025
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the physician was notified of a change in condition for 1 (#3) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for change in condition.The administrator identified 54 residents resided in the facility. Findings:A policy titled Neurological Observation, updated 10/12/17, read in part, A resident that receives any type of head wound or trauma involving the head, a neurologic assessment will be performed for the period of 72 hours. The physician will be notified immediately and with any changes in neurological status.A policy titled Notification of Changes, dated 10/24/24, read in part, All pertinent information will be made available to the provider by the health care team. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF755Nov 21, 2024
Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to administer physician ordered medications for one (#14) of five sampled residents reviewed for medications. The administrator reported 52 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A Medication Administration and General Guidelines policy, dated 07/10/23, read in part, Medications are administered in accordance with written orders of the attending physician. If a dose seems excessive considering the resident's age and condition, or a medication seems to be unrelated to the resident's current diagnosis or condition, the physician is contacted for clarification prior to the administration of the medication. Resident #14 had diagnoses which included senile degeneration of brain, anxiety disorder, and polyarthritis. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF881Nov 21, 2024
Based on record review and interview, it was determined the facility failed to implement an antibiotic stewardship program for three (#17, 39. and #44) of five residents sampled for medication review. The DON identified 52 residents resided in the facility. Findings: 1. Resident #17 had diagnoses which included chronic systolic congestive heart failure, permanent A-Fib, and recurrent depressive disorders. Resident #17's care plan, dated 07/31/24, documented frequently incontinent of bowel and occasional incontinent of urine. A Culture Urine for resident #17, dated 08/17/24, read in part, Culture Colony count > 100,000 CFU/ml Escherichia Coli (Abnormal). […]
Read 25 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 25 of 92 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Nov 17, 2025Complaint4 findings · 3 harm
- Nov 21, 2024Standard4 findings
- Aug 1, 2024Complaint2 findings
- Sep 22, 2022Standard2 findings
- Dec 31, 2019Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
- Jun 6, 2019Standard12 findings
- Apr 2, 2018Standard and complaint14 findings
- Jan 10, 2017Standard7 findings · 1 harm
Show the 7 earlier surveys
- Oct 15, 2015Standard7 findings
- Sep 8, 2015Complaint2 findings
- Dec 4, 2014Standard3 findings
- Oct 10, 2013—5 findings
- May 3, 2013—1 finding
- Nov 29, 2012—8 findings
- Sep 1, 2011—18 findings · 4 harm
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction