Deficiency Index

Core of Dale

Dale, Indiana · CCN 155270

37 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2017.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
185
Surveys
37
Harm or worse
6
Immediate jeopardy
3
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy3

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file26/37

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
52
Ownership
Government - City/county
Chain
MAJOR HOSPITAL
County
Spencer · rural
Medicare-certified since
1985

CMS ratings

Overall
—
Health inspection
—
Staffing
—
Quality measures
—

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 20 government-run facilities with fewer than 66 beds in Indiana.

Last survey on record

Apr 7, 2026

216 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day2.993.59
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.42—

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$12,682 across 1 penalty
Payment denials
1
Special focus
SFF

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ26.5%K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD1754.8%E825.8%F26.5%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C26.5%
CMS’s current file: 31 of the 185 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6004×

    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.

  • F6412×

    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.

  • F6572×

    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.

  • F8122×

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

  • F5761×

    Ensure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Core of Dale, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Aug 21, 2024

    A. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure supervision of two cognitively impaired residents; and failed to follow the facility elopement policy resulting in elopements for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for accidents. Resident B exited the facility by a side door and walked 0.5 miles to a gas station. An hour later, the resident's brother notified the facility that Resident B had left the facility. Resident C exited the facility by the front door after being returned to the facility by the son after an overnight stay. Twenty minutes later the resident was found outside the facility walking in the grass away from the facility next to the road, Highway 62. (Resident B, Resident C) This deficient practice resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy. […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF600Aug 2, 2023

    A. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from neglect for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for discharge. A resident (Resident B) with a court order to remain at the facility was allowed to leave and did not return. The resident was being monitored for suicide precautions at the time the resident was allowed to leave with an unknown female and has never returned. The resident's whereabouts was currently unknown. Legal authorities and the physician were not notified of the resident's departure from the facility or failure to return. As an endangered adult, the resident has the potential of harming himself if not under supervision. The resident had a history of being aggressive which has the potential of others being harmed as well. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF684Jan 19, 2023

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide care to maintain the residents highest practicable well-being for 2 of 4 residents reviewed. The Nurse Practitioner was not notified of abnormal laboratory results, diabetic protocol was not implemented for a newly diagnosed diabetic resident, blood glucose levels were not checked and elevated blood glucose results were not reported to physician or nurse practitioner. This resulted in a hospitalization for a blood glucose level of 889 mg/dL (milligrams per deciliter) and the incorrect dose of insulin being given. (Resident B and Resident D) Findings include: 1. On 1/11/23 at 10:00 A.M., Resident B's clinical record was reviewed. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Jun 24, 2022

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistance to prevent accidents for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents, resulting in 1 resident to be stabbed in the neck and suffer psychological harm of feeling bad and being afraid. (Resident B, Resident L, Resident M, Resident N, Resident P, Resident Q, Resident R) Findings include: 1. On 6/21/22 at 2:50 P.M., Resident N's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to paranoid [CONDITION(S)] and [CONDITION(S)]. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF801Sep 25, 2025

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies to carry out the functions of food and nutrition services. The Dietary Manager lacked appropriate certification. Finding includes: On 9/16/25 at 8:05 A.M., the current Dietary Manager indicated she started in that role on 9/5/25 and lacked a current certification and was working to become re-certified. On 9/25/25 at 9:48 A.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) provided a current, undated, Dietary Manager job description as their policy that indicated, Required Qualifications Minimum requirements include one of the following: Certification as a dietary manager. […]

Read 25 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 25 of 185 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Apr 7, 2026Standard and complaint5 findings
  • Sep 25, 2025Standard and complaint8 findings
  • May 19, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 7, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 21, 2024Standard10 findings · 1 harm
  • Mar 8, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 15, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 30, 2024Complaint1 finding
Show the 29 earlier surveys
  • Nov 27, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 26, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 2, 2023Standard19 findings · 1 harm
  • Mar 7, 2023Complaint5 findings
  • Jan 19, 2023Complaint6 findings · 1 harm
  • Oct 1, 2022Complaint2 findings
  • Jun 24, 2022Complaint5 findings · 1 harm
  • Jul 23, 2021Standard12 findings
  • Mar 18, 2021Complaint3 findings
  • Feb 4, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 14, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 24, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 28, 2020Complaint3 findings
  • Jan 29, 2020Standard15 findings · 1 harm
  • Jul 23, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 11, 2019Standard10 findings
  • Dec 13, 2018Complaint2 findings
  • Jun 28, 2018Complaint7 findings
  • Mar 7, 2018Standard11 findings
  • Sep 12, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 2, 2017Complaint6 findings · 1 harm
  • Apr 11, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 11, 2017Standard4 findings
  • Nov 20, 2015Standard5 findings
  • Oct 29, 2014Standard and complaint9 findings
  • Apr 29, 2014Complaint2 findings
  • Aug 28, 2013—7 findings
  • Jun 8, 2012—9 findings
  • Mar 25, 2011—7 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction