Deficiency Index

Complete Care at Prospect Heights LLC

Hackensack, New Jersey · CCN 315460

20 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2018.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
61
Surveys
20
Harm or worse
6
Immediate jeopardyall corrected before survey
2
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy2

Findings at the most serious level CMS records. All were recorded as past non-compliance — corrected before the survey.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file13/20

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
196
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
COMPLETE CARE
County
Bergen
Medicare-certified since
2000

CMS ratings

Overall
2
Health inspection
1
Staffing
2
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 168 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in New Jersey.

Last survey on record

Jan 29, 2026

284 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.093.47
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.86—
Annual nurse turnover45.9%41.8%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$59,312 across 6 penalties

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ13.0%K—L—
Actual harmG26.1%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD2472.7%E39.1%F26.1%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C13.0%
CMS’s current file: 33 of the 61 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F8804×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

  • F6583×

    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.

  • F6412×

    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.

  • F6572×

    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.

  • F6952×

    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Complete Care at Prospect Heights LLC, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, patternF880Sep 27, 2024

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to 1.) disinfect a multi-use glucometer with an EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) registered disinfectant for one (1) of four (4) residents (Resident #14) reviewed for blood glucose monitoring. This deficient practice had the potential to affect four (4) of four (4) residents (R #5, R #14, R #20, and R #297), who had physician's orders for blood glucose monitoring. On 09/24/24, one (1) of two (2) Licensed Practical Nurses on two (2) of the four (4) units was observed using an alcohol wipe to clean the glucometer after use on a resident. The failure to disinfect multi-use glucometer's with an appropriate disinfectant increased the likelihood of transmission of blood-borne pathogens. […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Feb 15, 2024

    C#:NJ00171288 Based on observation, interviews, review of medical records and other facility documentation on [DATE], it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident's specific Physician Order to receive nothing by mouth (NPO) on [DATE] was implemented. Resident #3 who was NPO, received a dinner meal tray from a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA #1). The CNA served Resident #3 the tray of another resident who was not in the facility at that time. The CNA failed to ask nursing staff why the resident was provided with a tray of food. Resident #3 was able to feed self, but had cognitive issues tounderstand and to be understood. A visitor in the room, informed the staff that the resident appeared to be choking. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF657Apr 16, 2024

    COMPLAINT#: NJ00171849 Based on observations, interviews, medical record reviews, and review of other pertinent facility documentation on 4/15/24 and 4/16/24, it was determined that the facility failed to implement and revise care plan (CP) interventions for a resident who was experiencing pain resulted to a decline in condition, and failed to follow the facility policy for Pain and Comprehensive Care Plan for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for implementation and revision of CP. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: According to the admission record, Resident #1 was admitted with diagnoses that included but not limited to: Fall, Difficulty in Walking, and Adult Failure to Thrive. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF697Apr 16, 2024

    COMPLAINT: # NJ00171849 Based on interviews, review of the medical records, and review of other pertinent facility documents, on 4/15/24 and 4/16/24, it was determined that the facility failed to consistently follow residents' care plan (CP), evaluate pain, and ensure that pain medications were administered according to the physician's orders (PO's) for residents who was experiencing pain. The facility also failed to follow its policy titled Pain for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for pain management. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: According to the admission record, Resident #1 was admitted with diagnoses that included but not limited to: Fall, Difficulty in Walking, and Adult Failure to Thrive. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Jan 29, 2026

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to; a.) store potentially hazardous foods in a manner to prevent food borne illness, b.) failed to properly label and date food items to ensure safety and prevent contamination, c.) failed to discard expired and unsafe food in accordance with facility policy, d.) failed to maintain kitchen equipment and utensils in a sanitary manner to prevent contamination from foreign substances and the potential for development of food borne illness, and e.) failed to maintain essential kitchen equipment in safe operating condition. […]

Read 26 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 26 of 61 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jan 29, 2026Standard and complaint19 findings
  • Mar 5, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 11, 2025Infection control1 finding
  • Sep 27, 2024Standard and complaint3 findings · 1 harm
  • Apr 16, 2024Complaint5 findings · 2 harm
  • Feb 15, 2024Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Oct 3, 2022Standard3 findings
  • Aug 26, 2020Complaint1 finding
Show the 12 earlier surveys
  • Feb 25, 2020Standard2 findings
  • Apr 12, 2019Standard4 findings
  • Feb 9, 2018Standard3 findings · 2 harm
  • Oct 26, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 18, 2016Standard3 findings
  • Jan 9, 2015Standard2 findings
  • Oct 27, 2014Complaint2 findings
  • Jan 10, 2014—1 finding
  • Dec 5, 2013—3 findings
  • Oct 22, 2012—3 findings
  • Sep 9, 2011—1 finding
  • Feb 11, 2011—2 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction