Deficiency Index

Complete Care at Maple Grove LLC

Madison, Wisconsin · CCN 525276

33 surveys since 2010. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2017.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
167
Surveys
33
Harm or worse
10
Immediate jeopardy
3
The record, 2010–2026
’10’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy3

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file18/33

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
184
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
COMPLETE CARE
County
Dane
Medicare-certified since
1977

CMS ratings

Overall
1
Health inspection
1
Staffing
4
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 15 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in Wisconsin.

Last survey on record

Jul 2, 2026

130 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.973.71
Registered-nurse hours per resident day1.04—
Annual nurse turnover64.0%58.8%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$153,657 across 6 penalties
Payment denials
3

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ22.4%K—L—
Actual harmG56.1%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD5567.1%E1417.1%F56.1%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C11.2%
CMS’s current file: 82 of the 167 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F68910×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

  • F5855×

    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.

  • F6094×

    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.

  • F6104×

    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.

  • F6774×

    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Complete Care at Maple Grove LLC, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Sep 12, 2024

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident (R) received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for altered diets out of a total sample of 6. R2 has had two choking episodes within a month's time. On [DATE], R2 choked on a hot dog. The Heimlich maneuver was performed, and R2 was sent to the emergency room and admitted to the hospital for acute hypoxic respiratory failure, aspiration event/choking on a hot dog, and aspiration pneumonitis. On [DATE], R2 was to receive a Level 6: soft and bite sized (no hot dogs), thin liquids consistency diet. […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Dec 4, 2023

    Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that each staff implemented proper safety interventions as directed by a resident's plan of care and did not ensure residents were free from accidents and hazards for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for falls. On [DATE], a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) attempted to provide care to R1 without maintaining the proper safety interventions as directed in R1's care plan. R1 rolled off the bed and fell approximately 2 feet to the floor, hitting her head. R1 suffered multiple fractures and a subarachnoid hemorrhage (bleeding in the space surrounding the brain), resulting in death. This created a finding of immediate jeopardy that began on [DATE]. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689May 5, 2025

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure fall interventions were in place per the care plan and each residents received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 3 of 23 sampled Residents (R27, R59, & R82) reviewed for falls and supervision. R27 is being cited at scope/severity level 3 (isolated/actual harm). R27 was a fall risk and has had 23 falls since admission on [DATE]. R27's falls typically occurred in the dining room or resident room; there were similarities to the falls including location and time of day. The facility completed a root cause analysis (RCA) and collected data on the falls; however, there is no evidence the interdisciplinary team (IDT) comprehensively reviewed the data or considered increasing R27's supervision. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Mar 28, 2025

    Based on interview, record review, and policy review the facility failed to ensure that the facility was free of accident hazards in 1 of 7 residents R9 reviewed for accident hazards of 14 sample residents. The facility failed to prevent a fall for R9 Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Fall Prevention Program, dated 02/28/25, indicated Policy: Each resident will be assessed for fall risk and will receive care and services in accordance with their individualized level of risk to minimize the likelihood of falls. Definitions: A fall is an event in which an individual unintentionally comes to rest on the ground, floor or other level, but not as result of an overwhelming external force .Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 1. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Oct 21, 2024

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure each resident receives adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 3 residents (R5) reviewed for supervision and accidents. R5 was served coffee while in his bed and dropped the coffee cup in the bed on his right side which pooled up against him. R5 sustained superficial partial thickness burns to right flank and right buttocks, estimated approximately 7% Total Body Surface Area (TBSA). Facility had no process in place regarding safety to residents with hot liquid temping or any type of safety assessment. After the incident occurred, coffee brewers were temped at 185 Fahrenheit. […]

Read 29 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 29 of 167 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jul 2, 2026Standard and complaint11 findings
  • Jun 25, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 29, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • May 5, 2025Standard13 findings · 1 harm
  • Mar 28, 2025Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
  • Nov 11, 2024Complaint2 findings
  • Oct 21, 2024Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Sep 12, 2024Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
Show the 25 earlier surveys
  • Jun 27, 2024Complaint8 findings
  • May 2, 2024Standard and complaint14 findings
  • Apr 10, 2024Complaint6 findings
  • Jan 8, 2024Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Dec 4, 2023Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
  • Oct 9, 2023Complaint3 findings
  • Feb 27, 2023Standard and complaint11 findings · 1 harm
  • Sep 12, 2019Standard6 findings
  • Sep 5, 2018Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Jul 26, 2018Standard7 findings
  • Sep 20, 2017Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • May 8, 2017Standard and complaint4 findings · 1 harm
  • Apr 3, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 21, 2017Complaint2 findings
  • Apr 7, 2016Standard11 findings
  • Mar 17, 2015Standard and complaint6 findings
  • Dec 17, 2014Complaint2 findings
  • Aug 5, 2014Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 6, 2014Complaint11 findings
  • Jan 17, 2013—12 findings
  • Oct 4, 2012—1 finding
  • Jul 30, 2012—1 finding
  • Nov 21, 2011—4 findings
  • Jul 18, 2011—4 findings
  • Sep 29, 2010—9 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction