Deficiency Index

Complete Care at Chestnut Hill LLC

Passaic, New Jersey · CCN 315085

15 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2019.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
82
Surveys
15
Harm or worse
5
Immediate jeopardy
2
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy2

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file11/15

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
111
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
COMPLETE CARE
County
Passaic
Medicare-certified since
1968

CMS ratings

Overall
1
Health inspection
2
Staffing
1
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 85 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in New Jersey.

Last survey on record

Jun 12, 2026

150 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.233.53
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.38—
Annual nurse turnover41.8%41.6%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$41,688 across 1 penalty

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K26.5%L—
Actual harmG26.5%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD2064.5%E619.4%F13.2%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 31 of the 82 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F5782×

    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.

  • F6572×

    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.

  • F6902×

    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.

  • F6922×

    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.

  • F5501×

    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Complete Care at Chestnut Hill LLC, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, patternF578Dec 5, 2024

    Based on interview, record review, and review of facility policy, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents had the correct code status, which matched their physician's orders in the medical record, that identified their wishes in the event of a medical emergency. This deficient practice was identified for 3 of 31 residents reviewed for code status (Resident #4, R #36, and R #40). 1. Resident #40 had a Practitioner Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST; a form that enables residents to indicate their preferences regarding life-sustaining treatment) dated [DATE], for a full-code status (all resuscitation procedures will be provided when a person stops breathing or their heart stops beating). […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, patternF835Dec 5, 2024

    Based on interviews and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) ensured staff implemented the facility's code status policy for residents during a medical emergency to ensure residents' wishes regarding life-sustaining treatments were honored. This deficient practice was identified for 3 of 31 residents reviewed for code status (Resident #4, R #36. and R #40). Refer F 578 1. Resident #40 had a Practitioner Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST; a form that enables residents to indicate their preferences regarding life-sustaining treatment) dated [DATE], for a full-code status (all resuscitation procedures will be provided when a person stops breathing or their heart stops beating). […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF692Jun 12, 2026

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to identify, assess, and implement timely and appropriate interventions for a resident (Resident #59) with an unplanned significant weight loss of 27.9 pounds (lbs.) or 17.23% significant weight loss in six months and a 31.6 lbs. or 19.13% significant weight loss in one month. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #59) reviewed for nutrition, and was evidenced by the following:The surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #59. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF692Aug 18, 2022

    Based on observations, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure identified Care Plan interventions were implemented timely, and the resident's physician was notified of significant weight loss for one resident, (Resident (R)69), of one reviewed for a significant weight loss. Specifically, R69's physician was not notified when R69's weight decreased and to potentially obtain orders to treat the weight loss and R69's supplements were not given as ordered in a timely manner. In total, R69's weight went from 155 pounds (lbs) to 113 lbs. Findings include: 1. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF865Dec 5, 2024

    Based on record review, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to maintain documentation of the facility's ongoing Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program. This failure had the potential to negatively affect 103 of 103 residents who resided at the facility. Findings Include: Review of the facility's policy titled, QAPI Plan Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement, updated 05/24 indicated, . Complete Care's mission is to continue its long history of providing the highest quality person-centered post-acute short-term subacute rehabilitation and long-term care residency in an environment that couples warmth of care with clinical The administrator, or designee, is responsible for assuring that all QAPI activities and required documentation is completed… […]

Read 21 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 21 of 82 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jun 12, 2026Standard4 findings · 1 harm
  • Dec 5, 2024Standard and complaint14 findings · 2 harm
  • Oct 18, 2022Infection control1 finding
  • Aug 18, 2022Standard11 findings · 1 harm
  • Feb 11, 2020Standard2 findings
  • Feb 5, 2019Standard13 findings · 1 harm
  • Jan 31, 2018Standard9 findings
  • Nov 10, 2016Standard5 findings
Show the 7 earlier surveys
  • Sep 2, 2015Standard1 finding
  • Nov 5, 2014Standard10 findings
  • Jan 9, 2014—5 findings
  • Feb 27, 2013—1 finding
  • May 3, 2012—4 findings
  • Aug 30, 2011—1 finding
  • Mar 29, 2011—1 finding

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction