Community Memorial Health Center
Hartley, Iowa · CCN 165177
18 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2015.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 75
- Surveys
- 18
- Harm or worse
- 6
- Immediate jeopardy
- 2
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 62
- Ownership
- Non profit - Other
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Obrien · rural
- Medicare-certified since
- 1992
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 3
- Health inspection
- 2
- Staffing
- 5
- Quality measures
- 2
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 102 not-for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in Iowa.
Last survey on record
Jan 22, 2026
291 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.02 | 3.76 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 1.12 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 41.1% | 40.0% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $36,338 across 1 penalty
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K15.3% | L— |
| Actual harm | G15.3% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1368.4% | E421.1% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F8423×
Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
- F5612×
Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
- F6092×
Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
- F6442×
Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
- F6001×
Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Community Memorial Health Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, patternF610Jul 8, 2024
Based on clinical record review, facility investigation review, staff interviews, and facility policy review the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation of an allegation of abuse. On 4/3/24, the nurse learned of a Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) slapping Resident #1 on the leg. After learning of this allegation of abuse, the facility allowed the CNA to finish working the scheduled night shift and to continue to work unattended behind closed doors with other residents. This failure resulted in residents living at the facility to be exposed to the potential of abuse therefore causing an Immediate Jeopardy to the health, safety, and security of the resident. […]
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Mar 1, 2021
Based on observation, record review, facility policy and staff interviews the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision to prevent elopement for 1 of 10 residents identified by the facility with wanderguards, (Resident #1). Resident#1 exited the facility unsupervised and the facility failed to properly respond to an activated door alarm which resulted in immediate jeopardy to resident health and safety. The facility reported a census of 67 residents. Findings include: Resident #1 had a Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], that documented a [DIAGNOSES REDACTED]. Resident #1 scored 5 of 15 on a BIMS (brief interview for mental status) test which indicated severely impaired cognition. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF684Aug 22, 2023
Based on record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide adequate assessment and timely intervention for 1 of 4 residents reviewed (Resident #1). On 4/15/23 at 2:50 a.m. Resident #1's alarm sounded and as staff responded they heard a thud and found resident laying on the floor on his right side. Facility staff failed to complete a thorough assessment which included range of motion (ROM) and failed to initiate neurologic checks following the unwitnessed fall. Additionally, the staff failed to complete a follow up assessment following the fall when pain was noticed during transfer with weight bearing. At 6:38 a.m. resident was assessed for ongoing right leg pain. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF684Aug 2, 2022
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide adequate assessment and timely intervention for a change in condition for 2 of 2 resident's reviewed (Resident #104, and #3). Resident #104 fell and sustained a head injury and fracture of the C1 vertebrae (neck) on [DATE]. On [DATE] the resident had pain documented on the Treatment Administration Record (TAR) with no documentation interventions were implemented to relieve the pain. The resident also had a change of condition with his oxygen (O2) saturation (sat) dropping to 52% (normal above 90%) and respirations 30 (normal ,d+[DATE]) and labored around 9:30 a.m. The facility failed to assess the resident's lung sounds related to the change. On [DATE] at 1:45 a.m. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Aug 2, 2022
Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to assure a resident had the identified interventions in place to prevent a fall with a major injury for 1 of 6 residents reviewed (Resident #104). Resident #104 had an intervention for a bed alarm to alert staff to his getting up. On 12/31/21 the resident sustained a fall in his room with no alarm. The resident sustained a head injury requiring sutures and C1 (neck) fracture. The facility reported a census of 55 residents. Findings include: According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] Resident #104 scored 2 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) indicating severe cognitive impairment. […]
Read 23 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 23 of 75 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jan 22, 2026Standard5 findings
- Nov 25, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Oct 7, 2025Complaint2 findings
- Nov 7, 2024Standard1 finding
- Jul 8, 2024Complaint5 findings · 1 harm
- Nov 2, 2023Standard4 findings
- Aug 22, 2023Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Aug 2, 2022Standard and complaint14 findings · 2 harm
Show the 10 earlier surveys
- Jul 29, 2021Standard10 findings
- Mar 1, 2021Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Sep 12, 2019Standard12 findings
- Jun 7, 2018Standard3 findings
- Mar 23, 2017Standard2 findings
- Feb 18, 2016Standard1 finding
- Mar 5, 2015Standard and complaint3 findings · 1 harm
- Dec 12, 2013—5 findings
- Nov 8, 2012—3 findings
- Oct 21, 2011—2 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction