Deficiency Index

The Village of Ackley

Ackley, Iowa · CCN 165443

24 surveys since 2011, 9 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
100
Surveys
24
Harm or worse
9
Immediate jeopardy
3
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy3

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file18/24

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
38
Ownership
Non profit - Corporation
Chain
WESTERN HOME COMMUNITIES
County
Hardin · rural
Medicare-certified since
2002

CMS ratings

Overall
3
Health inspection
3
Staffing
4
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 102 not-for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in Iowa.

Last survey on record

Mar 12, 2026

242 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.723.76
Registered-nurse hours per resident day1.08—
Annual nurse turnover66.7%40.0%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$47,149 across 2 penalties

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ13.0%K—L—
Actual harmG26.1%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD2472.7%E618.2%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 33 of the 100 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F5803×

    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.

  • F6412×

    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.

  • F8122×

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

  • F5501×

    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.

  • F5781×

    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at The Village of Ackley, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, patternF689May 16, 2023

    Based on observation, record review, staff interviews, and facility policy review the facility failed to provide adequate nursing supervision and assistive devices to ensure the environment was as free of hazards as possible for a resident at risk for elopement (when a resident leaves the building without staff knowledge or consent) for 5 of 5 residents reviewed. Resident #1 was identified with unspecified dementia, cognitive impairment, poor safety awareness, and recently had her wander guard (personal alarm sensor bracelet) removed. Investigation revealed facility staff failed to intervene on 5/2/23 when Resident #1 was observed wandering during the night fully clothed and had put her coat on. […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF757Apr 9, 2024

    Based on clinical record review, policy review and staff interview, the facility failed to have a system in place to ensure residents who use Coumadin (blood thinner) received their therapeutic monitoring as ordered by the physician for 3 of 3 residents reviewed (Residents #5, #13, #16). The facility failed to get Resident #5 and Resident #13's lab draws completed for at least 6 days. Resident #13 had an elevated lab level that required the facility to hold his medication for 2 doses. When Resident #5 missed her lab draw, the facility failed to get her lab draw completed resulting in her missing 8 days of her coumadin. The facility failed to follow the Physician's order for Resident #16 and drew their lab early resulting in a low therapeutic level for their convenience. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Jul 11, 2024

    Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and policy review the facility failed to provide adequate nursing supervision to prevent accidents and injuries for 1 of 4 residents reviewed (Resident #1) for falls. Resident #1 had four falls in the month of June. Resident #1 experienced a right ankle injury and a skin tear/bruise to right elbow when a fall resulted from the facility not providing the appropriate level of assistance per therapy recommendations. The facility reported a census of 32 residents. Findings include: Resident #1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, indicating intact cognition. Resident #1 was independent with bed mobility. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF692Jul 11, 2024

    Based on staff interviews, clinical record review, hospital record review, family interviews, and policy review the facility failed to conduct appropriate assessments, interventions and timely Physician notification for 1 of 4 resident reviewed (Resident #1). Resident #1 experienced difficulty swallowing, poor oral intake, and mouth pain that resulted in weight loss and a hospitalization from [DATE] to [DATE] for acute kidney injury, dehydration (inadequate fluid intakes) and pharyngitis/MRSA (Methicillin - resistant Staphylococcus Aureus - staph infection resistant to several antibiotic to the throat). Resident #1 started having difficulty swallowing on [DATE], went to the ER (emergency room ) on [DATE] and returned to the facility. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF623Feb 27, 2025

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview the facility failed to inform the Long Term Care (LTC) Ombudsman office of a resident transfer from the facility for 1 of 1 resident's reviewed (Resident #9) for hospitalization . The facility reported a census of 28 residents. Findings include: The Nursing Note dated 5/27/24 at 11:28 PM, reflected the hospital admitted Resident #9. The Nursing Note dated 5/30/24 at 11:44 AM, identified Resident #9 returned to the facility. The facility lacked documentation showing the required notification to the LTC Ombudsman of Resident #9's admission to the hospital. During an interview on 2/26/25 at 9:20 AM, the Administrator acknowledged he had the responsibility for sending the notifications to the LTC Ombudsman beginning in June 2024. […]

Read 26 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 26 of 100 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Mar 12, 2026Standard2 findings
  • Nov 20, 2025Complaint2 findings
  • Feb 27, 2025Standard and complaint4 findings
  • Jul 11, 2024Complaint6 findings · 2 harm
  • Apr 9, 2024Standard and complaint16 findings · 1 harm
  • Oct 30, 2023Complaint3 findings
  • May 16, 2023Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Jan 17, 2023Standard6 findings
Show the 16 earlier surveys
  • Jun 10, 2021Standard and complaint4 findings
  • Jul 25, 2019Standard2 findings
  • Apr 26, 2018Standard2 findings
  • Feb 23, 2017Standard and complaint9 findings
  • Jul 13, 2016Complaint2 findings
  • Jun 3, 2016Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
  • May 23, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 25, 2016Standard5 findings
  • Apr 2, 2015Standard3 findings
  • Mar 16, 2015Complaint4 findings · 1 harm
  • Oct 9, 2014Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 5, 2014Complaint11 findings · 2 harm
  • Feb 25, 2014Complaint7 findings · 1 harm
  • Jan 16, 2014Standard3 findings
  • Nov 29, 2012—2 findings
  • Oct 14, 2011—1 finding

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction