Every finding on record at Community Health and Rehabilitation Center

Based upon observations, the facility failed to ensure residents had a clean and sanitary environment as evidenced by residents' personal items not labeled and stored appropriately for each resident in 5 out of 9 rooms sampled.The findings include:An observation was made on the north hallway of Unit 2 on 8/25/25 at 11:00 AM. The following issues were observed:In room [ROOM NUMBER], personal items were not labeled and not separated for each resident residing in the room. In room [ROOM NUMBER], a bedpan was sitting in the bathroom in between the handrail and wall and was not bagged.In room [ROOM NUMBER], a resident's urinal was hanging on the garbage can next to the bed out of the resident's reach.In room [ROOM NUMBER], a bedpan was observed in the bathroom sitting between the handrail and the wall.A second observation was made on this hall on 8/25/25 at 3:00 pm. The following issues were observed.In room [ROOM NUMBER], the personal items sitting in the resident's bathroom was still not labeled or separated for each resident residing in the room.The bedpans in room [ROOM NUMBER] and 236 were still not labeled or bagged and sitting in bathroom in between the handrail and wall.room [ROOM NUMBER]'s urinal was still lying on its side on the bedside cabinet next to the bed. Additional observations made on 08/26/25 at 08:30 am, 11:30 am, and 3:35 pm, on 8/27/2025 at 9:01 am, and 12:00 noon revealed these issues remained uncorrected. In addition on 8/27/2025, room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed with a urine graduate sitting on the handrail in the bathroom.

Based on observation, staff interview, record reviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the provision of care in accordance with professional standards by not ensuring that wound care was provided as stated in the physician order in a timely manner and failed to assess and document a newly identified skin impairment for 2 of 2 residents sampled for non-pressure related skin impairments. (Resident #9 and #106)The findings include: Resident #106 On 8/25/25 at approximately 12:00 PM, an interview and observation was conducted with Resident #106. A Negative Pressure Wound Device (wound vac) was sitting on the bed with the hose not connected to Resident #106. The resident stated it was removed by the nurse at approximately 6:00 AM on 08/25/25 due to becoming loose from the dressing to the lower back surgical wound. A gauze with tape was noted on the lower back with no date present. A Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) was in place to the inner right upper arm with the date of 8/14 written on the dressing. On 8/25/25 at approximately 2:05 PM, an observation of Resident #106 was conducted with Nurse A, a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN). Nurse A (LPN) explained that she was going to replace the Negative Pressure Device and change the PICC line dressing today (8/25/25). Nurse A explained the PICC line dressing was to be changed every Sunday evening. A review of the resident's medical record revealed a physician order on 8/8/25 to apply a wound vac to the surgical incision wound. There was a note by the Nurse Practitioner on 8/11/25 that the wound vac was not started on the resident. Review of the treatment record revealed the following physician's order, Negative pressure wound device settings @ 125mmhg continuous. Cleanse area with Normal saline, pat dry, skin prep peri-wound, apply sponge, secure with negative pressure wound dressing. Every evening shift every 3 day(s) for Negative Pressure Utilization Eval for pain prior to, during, and after treatment and medicate as needed. Monitor site for S/S of infection and notify the Practitioner as needed. Start Date 8/11/25. The resident's medical record revealed the following physician's order for dressing change, Change every week and PRN. Measure length of line and circumference of arm upon admission and insertion then weekly. To measure length, start from hub of PICC line to insertion site on forearm, to measure arm circumference measure at the insertion site around the forearm. Continue weekly until line discontinued. Document the length of line & circumference of arm upon admission and insertion below.MID LINE LENGTH: ____13___cm. ARM CIRCUMFERENCE: _25______cm. every evening shift every 7 days for intravenous maintenance. Report signs and symptoms of infections and/or infiltration and/or dislodgement to MD. Change dressing weekly and document measurement of line as needed for IV maintenance. Start Date 8/14/2025. On 8/26/25 at approximately 2:00 PM, the Negative Pressure Wound Device was still on the bed not connected to Resident #106. The PICC line dressing was dated 8/25/25. On 8/26/25 at approximately 3:00 PM, the Negative Pressure Device and dressing change was being completed by Nurse A (LPN) and ADON. At this time the ADON explained the facility had to order more supplies and wait on them to arrive on 8/26/25 to change dressing. The facility policy and procedure titled Catheter Insertion and Care states, The purpose of the policy was to change dressings according to physician orders. Step 1of the policy and procedure listed that central venous catheter dressings will be changed at specific intervals, or when needed, to prevent catheter-related infections that are associated with contaminated, loosened, soiled, or wet dressings. The review of the policy and procedure titled Dressing Change-Non-Sterile and Sterile was conducted. Step 1 of the policy and procedure listed to verify physician order for most current treatment order. Resident #9: An observation of Resident #9 was conducted on 8/25/25 at 2:02 PM. The resident was observed to have a blister on her right lower leg about the size of a quarter. Another observation of Resident #9 was conducted with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) on 8/27/25 at 2:03 PM. A white dressing dated 8/26 was observed in place on the resident's right lower leg. The ADON removed the dressing and stated a blister was under the dressing and was intact. Review of the resident's electronic medical record on 8/27/25 revealed there was no documentation of the blister on the resident's right lower leg and no physician order for a dressing to the blister. A follow-up interview was conducted with the ADON on 8/27/25 at 2:10 PM. The ADON reviewed the electronic medical record and stated there was no documentation of the blister and no physician order for the dressing that was on the resident's right lower leg. She also confirmed the resident's weekly skin check that was due on 8/26/25 was not completed. The facility policy Notification of Change in Condition (CCHC 0625 2016) states, When a resident is determined to have a change in condition, the licensed nurse will evaluate the resident and notify the family/legal representative and the health care provider. Employees shall communicate any information about a resident's status change to the appropriate licensed personnel upon observation. A licensed nurse will perform an evaluation and notify the Health Care Provider as indicated. A licensed nurse is to notify the family/legal representative/resident regarding the resident's change in condition and any new plan of care. The licensed nurse is to implement treatment interventions and any received physician orders. The licensed nurse is to document the notification of change to the family/legal representative/resident and Health Care Provider in the medical record.

Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure each resident bedroom was equipped to provide full visual privacy for 1 of 19 sampled resident bedrooms. (room [ROOM NUMBER])An observation of room [ROOM NUMBER]A was conducted on 8/26/25 at 2:09 PM. The room was occupied by a resident. The privacy curtain was observed to be about 3 feet too short in width to provide full visual privacy of the resident. In addition, the existing curtain was stuck and would not pull in the curtain track. Another observation of room [ROOM NUMBER]A was conducted on 8/27/25 at 10:07 AM with the Housekeeping Supervisor. She observed the curtain and stated the track was coming loose from the ceiling and confirmed the curtain was too short in length to provide full visual privacy. (Photographic evidence was obtained.) She stated she had a list of rooms regarding privacy curtain issues that was created on 8/26/25 and room [ROOM NUMBER] was included on the list.

Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain sanitary food practices and ensure kitchen staff wore required hair covering while preparing resident meals. The findings include:On 08/25/2025 at approximately 10:30AM, during kitchen tour with Food Service Director observed staff K cooking lunch without a hair net. Food Service Director asked staff if staff K was wearing a hair net. Staff K stated, No, I am not wearing one. During the same tour at approximately 10:55AM observed in the vegetable freeze a 16 oz Pepsi on the top shelf. Interviewed Food Service Director confirming the drink belong to a staff member. On 8/28/25 at approximately 9:33AM observed staff J cooking meal without facial covering for beard and mustache. Food Service Director informed staff J to put facial covering on. After reviewing emergency food, staff J was still without facial covering. Food Service Director informed staff J to leave the area to put facial covering on.

Based on observation, staff interview, resident interview, and records review, the facility failed to ensure the interdisciplinary team assessed and determined residents were capable of self-administration of medications prior to allowing 2 of 4 residents sampled for medication administration to self-administer medications. (Residents #32 and #61) The findings include: During the observation of medication administration on 06/04/2024 at 9:13 AM with Registered Nurse (RN) I, it was observed that oral medications, including a schedule II medication, Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen Tablet 5-325 milligrams (mg) (a medication used for pain), were placed in a medicine cup and left at the bedside for Resident #61 to self-administer. Following this observation, an interview was completed with RN I. She said that Resident #61 was not assessed for self-administration. An observation on 6/4/2024 at about 9:20 AM found Resident #32 with 8 pills loose on the breakfast tray in front of him/her. (photographic evidence obtained) During a follow up interview on 6/4/24 at about 9:30 AM with RN I, she stated she was told there are a number of residents in the facility she can trust to take their medications. RN I said no residents were assessed for self-administration of medications. A review of medical records revealed the medications administered to Resident #32 included: Tradjenta 5 mg (a medication to treat diabetes) Thiamine HCl 100 mg (a mineral supplement) Tenormin 50 mg (used to treat high blood pressure) Tamsulosin HCl Capsule 0.4 mg (used to treat enlarged prostate) Spironolactone 100 mg (used to treat high blood pressure) Oxycodone Hydrochloride 10 mg (Resident #32 said this medication was not administered with other medications during the observation/interview on 06/04/2024) Prednisone 20 mg (used to treat arthritis) Multiple Vitamins-Minerals Furosemide 40 mg (a high blood pressure medication) Folic Acid Tablet 1 mg (a mineral supplement) Aspirin Oral Tablet (used to treat cardiovascular risks) Medications left at bedside for Resident #61 to self-administer: Simethicone Oral 1 tablet (used to treat gas) Sennosides-Docusate Sodium Tablet 8.6-50 mg (a laxative) Losartan Potassium Oral Tablet 50 mg (a high blood pressure medication) Lasix Tablet 20 mg (a diuretic) Lamictal Oral Tablet 100 mg (used to treat bipolar disorder) Hydralazine HCl Tablet 25 mg (a high blood pressure medication) GlycoLax Powder mg (a laxative) Duloxetine HCl Capsule Delayed Release Particles 60 mg (an antidepressant) Cetirizine HCl Tablet 10 mg (an antihistamine) Carvedilol Tablet 25 mg (a high blood pressure medication) Alprazolam Oral Tablet 0.25 mg (an anti-anxiety medication) Acetaminophen 325 mg A review of facility Policy for Medication Pass Guideline included the following: Procedure section #9 Administration of medication: Remain with resident until administration of medications complete.

Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, record review and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that wound assessments, dressing changes and wound care were provided in accordance with physician orders and facility policy for 2 of 3 residents sampled for wound care observations (Resident #7 & #24). The findings include: Resident #24: On 6/3/24 at approximately 11:46 AM, an interview and observation was conducted with Resident #24. The surveyor entered the room as the resident repeatedly said, help me, help me. The resident indicated she wanted to get up. The resident showed the surveyor her left leg. She indicated that her leg was bothering her. Resident #24 had a small, round, uncovered open area lateral to her left knee. Her left lower leg had a dressing. The dressing was dated 5/30 (4 days ago). The dressing had visible dried brown drainage present. (photographic evidence obtained) On 6/4/24 a review of Resident #24's record was conducted. A review of the progress notes and hospital discharge summary from 5/29/24 for Resident #24 revealed that the resident had been in the hospital for treatment of an infected post-surgical wound after surgical repair of a fracture of the left lower leg. She was treated for a systemic infection related to the infected wound. Resident #24 was discharged with an intravenous (IV) access and orders to receive IV antibiotics to treat the infection along with orders for daily dressing changes to the area. The record indicated that the resident was readmitted to the facility from the hospital on 5/29/24. A review of the current physician orders was conducted for Resident #24. There was an order to loosely fill cavity to left knee with 1/4 inch iodoform gauze and cover with dry dressing daily and as needed (PRN) if soiled or dislodged for wound management with a start date of 6/1/24. There was also a physician order for a Calcium Alginate Dressing to left lateral leg every day shift for skin management, evaluate for pain prior, during, and after treatment and medicate as needed. Monitor site for signs and symptoms of infection and notify MD (medical doctor) if issues are detected. Cleanse with wound care cleanser, Dakin's to wound bed, calcium Alginate Ag and dry dressing daily and prn if soiled with a start date of 6/1/24. A review of the June 2024 Treatment Administration Record (TAR) for Resident #24 was conducted. Regarding the physicians order to loosely fill cavity to left knee with 1/4 inch iodoform gauze and over with dry dressing daily, the TAR was not initialed on 6/2/24 indicating this treatment had not been completed. Regarding the physician order for the Calcium Alginate Ag Dressing to left lateral leg every day shift, for skin management eval for pain prior during and after treatment and medicate as needed (PRN), monitor site for signs and symptoms of infection and notify MD, Cleanse with Wound care cleanser, Dakin's to wound bed, calcium Alginate Ag and dry dressing daily and prn if soiled was not initiated on 6/1/24 or 6/2/24 indicating that the dressing had not been changed on those dates. On 6/4/24 at approximately 9:45 AM, Resident #24 was observed to have no dressing over her left knee. The dressing on the left lateral leg was clean dry and dated 6/4/24. On 6/5/24 at approximately 10:40 AM, an interview was conducted with Nurse A, a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN). Wound care was observed for Resident #24. When the observation was conducted, there was no dressing on Resident #24's left knee. Nurse A loosely filled the cavity to left knee with 1/4 inch iodoform gauze and covered the area with a dry dressing. Nurse A LPN was shown the image taken on 6/3/24 with the dressing dated 5/30/24 and no cover over wound on left knee. Nurse A explained that she has been caring for Resident #24 on day shift this week since 6/3/24. She indicated that Resident #24 often removes the dressing over the left knee herself. She also explained that Resident #24 had been discharged from the hospital recently and that she did not realize that daily dressing changes were ordered for the wound on the left lower leg until 6/4/24 when she changed the dressing as ordered. On 6/6/24 at approximately 9:40 AM, an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). She was shown the image taken on 6/3/24 of Resident #24's leg with the missing dressing and an old dressing dated 5/30/24 in place. The DON agreed that the dressing on the lower leg should have been changed as ordered. The DON was asked to provide a copy of the facility policy regarding dressing changes and administration of medications and treatments. A review of the facility policy titled Dressing Change was conducted. The purpose of the policy states to change dressings according to physician orders. Step 1 of the procedure listed to verify physician order for most current treatment order. A review of the facility policy titled Medication Pass Guidelines was conducted. The policy indicated that medications should be administered in accordance with frequency prescribed by the physician and that patient refusal should be documented in the record. Resident #7 On 6/4/24, a review of the current physician orders was conducted for Resident #7. She had an order to have a wound to the right sacrum cleansed with wound cleanser pat dry and then mepilex dressing applied every day shift every three days for wound management. The start date for the order was on 4/22/24. A review of the June 2024 Treatment Administration Record (TAR) for Resident #7 was conducted. The physicians order Cleanse wound to right sacrum with wound cleanser pat dry and apply a mepilex dressing every day shift every three days for wound management. Start date 4/22/24. was initialed on the TAR on 6/3/24 indicating this treatment had been completed. A review was also conducted of the May 2024 TAR. The treatment was signed off as being done every 3 days except 5/19/24. A review of the progress notes and evaluations revealed no documentation that the wound had healed. The last weekly skin evaluation was dated 4/30/24. The current care plan indicated that the resident had a wound to the sacrum in the at risk for alteration in nutrition/hydration focus area. The potential for impaired skin integrity area indicated that the resident had a history of shearing of her bottom. On 6/4/24 at approximately 8:15 AM, an interview was conducted with Resident #7. She was asked if she had any wounds or open areas on her skin. Resident #7 said she had no open areas. Resident #7 explained that she had a wound previously but she does not have any open areas on her skin presently. On 06/04/24 at 1:41 PM, Nurse A, a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), was asked if she could observe the wound on Resident #7's sacrum. Nurse A, LPN asked Resident #7 to turn over in the bed. She had no wound, no abnormality of her skin anywhere on her lower back or sacrum, and no dressing present. Nurse A explained she never put a dressing on Resident #7 because there was no wound. She offered to put a dressing over the resident's sacrum. Nurse A was asked if she had considered contacting the physician to have the order discontinued. Nurse A did not respond. Nurse A was asked how often skin assessments are completed for the residents and pointed out that Resident #7 did not have a documented skin assessment since 4/30/24. She explained that skin assessments are normally completed weekly and confirmed that 4/30/24 was the last skin assessment for Resident #7 in the chart. On 6/6/24 at approximately 9:40 AM an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). She was notified that the Resident #7 observations conducted with Nurse A revealed that Resident #7 longer had a wound on her sacrum. However, wound care was being documented as being done on both May and June TARs. She indicated that the resident likely returned from the hospital in April with the order and it has not been discontinued. The DON indicated that this would be addressed. The DON was asked to provide a copy of the facility policy regarding dressing changes and administration of medications and treatments.

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow physician orders for tube feeding formula for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for tube feeding. (Resident #26) The findings include: During a tour of the facility conducted on 06/03/24 at 11:45 AM, Resident #26 was observed lying in her bed with tube feeding hanging but not infusing. The bottle of tube feeding formula that was observed was Jevity 1.5 (photographic evidence obtained). A second observation was conducted on 06/03/24 at 2:30 PM of Resident #26's tube feeding infusing-the bottle infusing was Jevity 1.5 formula. Initial review of Resident #26's record revealed the tube feeding order written by the physician on 09/24/23 was for Jevity 1.2 formula. This indicates Resident #26 was receiving the wrong tube feeding formula. Resident #26 was last readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident #26's medical history revealed she has a history of Cancer, Difficulty Swallowing, and Gastrostomy Tube Dependency. An interview was conducted with Staff A, a Licensed Practical Nurse, on 06/05/24 at 1:53 PM. Staff A confirmed she was assigned to Resident #26 on 06/03/24. She stated Resident #26's tube feeding bottle was changed by the night shift staff and that she was responsible for stopping it at 10:00 AM and restarting it at 12:00 PM each day, per the physician order. Staff A stated she had not noticed the wrong tube feeding formula was infusing during her shift on 06/03/24. An interview was conducted with the Registered Dietitian on 06/05/24 at 11:40 AM. She stated she was aware that Resident #26 was ordered to receive Jevity 1.2 formula. She said at times, if there were to be a lack of Jevity 1.2, it would be fine for the facility staff to substitute and give a resident Jevity 1.5 instead. She stated she did not know if this was why the staff had chosen to give the incorrect formula on 06/03/24. An interview was conducted with Staff D, the Central Supply Coordinator, on 06/05/24 at 1:15 PM. Staff D stated that the facility did not have a lack of Jevity 1.2 over the weekend or on 06/03/24. She confirmed there was Jevity 1.2 available for the staff to administer to Resident #26. An interview was conducted with the facility's Director of Nursing on 06/05/24 2:18 PM. She stated that she was unaware that Resident #26 had received the wrong tube feeding formula on 06/03/24.

Based on observations, record reviews, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to obtain physician orders to administer oxygen for 1 of 4 residents sampled for respiratory care. (Resident #15) The findings include: On 6/3/24 at 12:04 PM, 6/4/24 at 12:48 PM and 3:16 PM, and 6/5/24 at 8:45 AM, Resident #15 was observed in bed receiving humidified oxygen via nasal cannula at 1.5 liters (L) from an oxygen concentrator. On 6/5/24 at 11:17 AM, Resident #15 was observed sitting up in a wheelchair in the hall near their room receiving oxygen via nasal cannula at 2 L from portable oxygen tank. On 6/3/24, a record review was conducted for Resident #15. The record review included a review of the current and discontinued/completed physician orders. There were no orders for oxygen therapy. On 6/5/24 at 8:46 AM, an interview was conducted with Resident #15, who stated they have been using oxygen for 2 to 3 weeks prior to admission to the facility and has been on oxygen continuously since admission to the facility. On 6/5/24 at 10:23 AM, an interview was conducted with Staff H, a Registered Nurse caring for Resident #15. She reviewed the resident's electronic medication administration record and verbally agreed there was no order for oxygen and stated the night shift nurse told her the resident was on oxygen when she gave her report this morning and wrote it on the report sheet that the resident was on 2 L oxygen via nasal cannula. On 6/5/24 at 10:30 AM, an interview was conducted with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), who reviewed the resident's orders and verbally agreed there were no orders for the oxygen and stated she will find out why she was placed on oxygen. On 6/5/24 at 2:16 PM, an interview was conducted with the ADON, who acknowledged that there was no order for the oxygen but it has now been fixed and they have the order for oxygen. On 6/5/24 A review of the policy Daily Review of Physician's Orders, 2015 was conducted. The policy read as follows: Procedure 1. The nurse will review the Physician order section of the medical record daily. 4. The nurse should identify any transcription issue or omission and: Notify supervisor Document on the 24 hour report Take action to correct

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain proper infection control protocol for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for transmission based precautions. (Resident #44) The findings included: During a tour of the facility conducted on 06/03/24 at 11:45 AM, Resident #44's room door had an isolation sign for Enhanced Barrier Precautions. An initial review of Resident #44's record revealed a physician's order written on 06/02/24 for Contact Isolation. Further review of Resident #44's record revealed this Contact Isolation order was written due to Resident #44 having an Extended Spectrum Beta-Lactamase (ESBL) infection in her urine requiring the use of Macrobid (an oral antibiotic) from 05/26/24 to 06/09/24. Resident #44 was last readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of Resident #44's medical history revealed she had a history of Chronic Kidney Disease, Urinary Tract Infections, and Dementia. Continued observations were conducted on 06/04/24 and 06/05/24 revealed the Enhanced Barrier Precautions sign on Resident #44's door was not the correct Contact Isolation sign. An interview was conducted with Staff A, Licensed Practical Nurse on 06/05/24 at 1:53 PM. Staff A confirmed she was the nurse assigned to Resident #44 for the week. When asked if Resident #44 was in isolation, she said she was in isolation because she had something going on with her urine but was unable to provide more information without consulting the electronic health record. Staff A reviewed Resident #44's chart and verbalized that Resident #44 was supposed to be on Contact Isolation. When showed the room door, Staff A stated she did not know why there was not a Contact Isolation sign on the door. An interview was conducted with Staff B, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) on 06/05/24 at 2:00 PM. Staff B confirmed she was the CNA assigned to Resident #44 for the week. When asked if Resident #44 was in isolation for any reason, she stated Resident #44 was not on isolation. An interview was conducted with the facility's Director of Nursing on 06/05/24 at 2:18 PM. She stated that she was unaware that Resident #44 had an order for Contact Isolation.

Based on record review, staff interviews, and resident interview the facility failed to ensure sufficient nurse staffing on all shifts resulting in 5 of 5 sampled residents not receiving physician ordered medications on the morning of 8/26/23. (Residents #1,# 2, #3, #4, and #5) The findings include: Review of the staff assignment sheet for 11:00 PM-7:00 AM shift beginning on 8/25/23 and ending on 8/26/23 revealed the south unit had only one nurse for the shift (Employee A, who is a licensed practical nurse (LPN)). The other nurse that was scheduled did not report to work for the assigned shift. An interview was conducted with the Administrator on 8/31/23 at 10:53 AM. The Administrator stated that, on the 8/25/23 11:00 PM-7:00 AM shift, the facility had 3 nurses scheduled to work, but one nurse was absent. The Director of Nursing (DON) nor himself were notified the nurse did not report for work until about 3:00 AM on 8/26/23. They attempted to find a nurse to come in but were not successful. He stated the DON had worked from 7 AM - 11 PM on 8/25/23 and had worked as on the floor for the 3:00 PM-11:00 PM shift on the south hall on 8/25/23. They were aware medications were not administered as ordered. The physician was notified, but no new orders were given. An additional interview was conducted with the Administrator on 8/31/23 at 12:24 PM. He stated that after the DON had worked 3:00 PM- 11:00 PM on medication cart 2 south unit on 8/25/23 that she then counted medications and gave cart 2 to Employee A (LPN). Employee A also counted medications and took over medication cart 1 on the south unit because the DON informed Employee A that the additional 11:00 PM - 7:00 AM nurse was on the way to the facility. When asked why a nurse did not come to assist with the 6:00 AM medication pass on 8/26/23, he stated they were not able to find a nurse to assist. He stated the resident census was 60 on 8/25/23 on the south unit. An interview was conducted with Employee B, a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), on 8/31/23 at 2:55 PM. Employee B stated she worked the 11:00 PM - 7:00 AM shift beginning on 8/25/23 on the north hall. She stated there was only one nurse on the south hall that night. She did not realize there were only 2 nurses in the facility the night of 8/25/23 until after 2:30 AM on 8/26/23 when Employee A came and told her the 3rd scheduled nurse did not show for work. A telephone interview was conducted with the DON on 8/31/23 at 3:08 PM. The DON stated she was not aware medications were not administered on the south unit on 8/26/23 until a nurse texted her on 8/27/23. She stated she was relieved on 8/25/23 of her 3:00 PM-11:00 PM shift by Employee A (LPN) and was not aware the other scheduled nurse did not show until around 3:00 AM on 8/26/23 when the nurse called and left her a message. She stated she has been out of the facility since Tuesday (8/29/23) and had not yet addressed the medications that were not administered on 8/26/23. A telephone interview was conducted with Employee A (LPN) on 8/31/23 at 3:16 PM. The nurse stated she was the only nurse on the south unit for the 11:00 PM-7:00 AM shift beginning on 8/25/23 and ending on 8/26/23 and was responsible for 58-60 residents. The Director of Nursing (DON) reported that another nurse was coming in but was running late. The DON had worked the 3:00 PM- 11:00 PM shift on the south unit and asked her to take both medication carts 1 and 2 on the south unit. Employee A stated she attempted to inform the DON of the situation by texting the DON around 1:30 AM on 8/26/23, and then attempted to call around 2:00 AM on 8/26/23, but the call went to voicemail. She notified the nurse on the north unit, and they attempted to call the DON again, but the call still went to voicemail. The DON called back around 3:30 AM on 8/26/23 and stated she was under the assumption that a nurse was supposed to come in. Employee A stated none of the residents on south medication cart 2 had received morning medications, blood sugar checks, or insulin as ordered by the physician on the morning of 8/26/23. She could not administer medications to 60 residents, but she did check on the residents to ensure they were stable. No one came in to assist her on the shift and she did not know if the DON attempted to call anyone in. She reported to the 7:00 AM- 3:00 PM nurse that came in on 8/26/23 that the residents on south medication cart 2 had not received their morning medications. An interview was conducted with Resident #3 on 8/31/23 at 2:12 PM. She stated she had missed a few of the morning doses of her physician ordered insulin. A review of Resident #1's August 2023 medication administration record (MAR) revealed the resident had physician orders receive insulin glargine 32 units subcutaneous daily at 6 AM, hydralazine 25 mg one by mouth every 8 hours at 6 AM, 2 PM, and 10 PM, and blood glucose checks every morning at 6:30 AM. The MAR was blank for the 6 AM medications and the 6:30 AM blood glucose check on 8/26/23. A review of Resident #2's August 2023 MAR revealed the resident had physician orders to receive levothyroxine 175 mg by mouth daily at 6 AM. The MAR was blank for the 6 AM dose on 8/26/23. A review of Resident #3's August 2023 MAR revealed that the resident had physician orders to receive Novolog insulin 10 units subcutaneous before meals with a dose at 6:30 AM and a blood glucose check at 6:30 AM daily. The MAR was blank for the administration of the insulin and blood glucose check at 6:30 AM on 8/26/23. A review of Resident #4's August 2023 MAR revealed the resident had physician orders for insulin glargine 30 units subcutaneous daily at 6 AM, omeprazole 40 mg by mouth every morning at 6 AM, and a blood glucose check at 6:30 AM daily. The MAR was blank for the administration of the insulin, omeprazole, and blood glucose check at 6:30 AM on 8/26/23. A review of Resident #5's August 2023 MAR revealed the resident had physician orders for Zoloft 100 mg by mouth daily at 6 AM, pantoprazole sodium 40 mg by mouth twice daily with a dose scheduled for 6 AM, sucralfate 1 gram by mouth before meals and at bedtime with a dose scheduled for 6:30 AM, and a blood glucose check before meals and at bedtime with one scheduled for 6:30 AM daily. The MAR was blank for the 6 AM and 6:30 AM doses of medications and the 6:30 AM blood glucose check. Review of the facility assessment (updated 7/19/23) revealed on page 8 that the facility's overall staffing plan is based on an hours per patient day basis and utilizes both historical and current labor data, census, census mix, resident acuity, all resident care and support needs, and an analysis of how well the facility met/is meeting all of the needs of the resident population. The facility is to meet this overall staffing plan on a constant basis and adjust as needed for changes in census, acuity, and resident care and support needs.

Based on interviews, record reviews and policy reviews, the facility failed to ensure accurate accounting of controlled substances for 3 of 7 residents sampled (Residents #20, #57, and #155). The findings include: A review was conducted of the controlled drug declining inventory sheets and the electronic medication administration record. The following discrepancies were identified: Resident # 155 Diazepam (anxiety) 2 mg (milligrams) - 6 tablets were marked as on hand on 3/9/23 on the Controlled Drug Declining Inventory Sheet. Further review of the sheet revealed that one tablet of diazepam was administered on 3/9/23 at 8:30 AM, 3:00 PM, and 9:00 PM, 3/10/23 at 3:00 AM, 1:30 PM, and 11:00 PM, equaling 6 tablets with zero tablets remaining. However, review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for March 2023 revealed the medication was documented as administered 4 times (3/9/23 at 8:21 AM and 2:56 PM and 3/10/23 at 11:10 AM and 11:11 PM) indicating that there should be 2 tablets remaining and not zero as documented on the controlled drug inventory sheet. There were 2 tablets that were not documented as given to the resident but were noted as removed from the controlled drug inventory. Resident # 57 Hydrocodone (pain) 10 mg/325 mg - 18 tablets were marked as on hand on 2/17/23 on the Controlled Drug Declining Inventory Sheet. Further review of the sheet revealed that one tablet of Hydrocodone was given on 2/17/23, 2/18/23, 2/20/23 at 6:00 AM and 8:00 PM, 2/21/23 and there was a notation that a tablet was wasted, and the count was decreased to 12 however no date is noted, 2/25/23, 2/27/23, 3/3/23, 3/5/23, 3/7/23, 3/11/23, and 3/14/23 - equaling 14 tablets with 5 tablets noted as remaining on 3/14/23. However, review of the MARs for February and March of 2023 revealed the medication was documented twice as being administered to resident #57, (2/17/23 and 2/18/23) indicating that there should be 16 tablets remaining and not 5 as documented on the controlled drug inventory sheet. There were 11 tablets that were not documented as given to the resident but were noted as removed from the controlled drug inventory. Resident # 20 Clonazepam (anxiety) 0.5 mg - 15 tablets were marked as on hand on 1/20/23 on the Controlled Drug Declining Inventory Sheet. Further review of the sheet revealed that one tablet of the Clonazepam was given on 1/20/23, 1/24/23; 2/1/23, 2/2/23, 2/8/23, 2/11/23, 2/16/23, 2/22/23, and 2/27/23, equaling 9 tablets with 6 tablets noted as remaining on 2/27/23. However, review of the MAR for January 2023-March 2023 revealed the medication was documented as administered 6 times (1/24/23, 2/1/23, 2/2/23, 2/8/23, 2/22/23 and 2/27/23) indicating that there should be 9 tablets remaining and not 6 as documented on the controlled drug inventory sheet. There were 3 tablets that were not documented as given to the resident but were noted as removed from the controlled drug inventory. An interview was conducted on 3/15/2023 at approximately 11:45 AM with the Director of Nursing (DON). The DON stated, I am responsible for making sure the reconciliations are completed with controlled substances. An interview was conducted on 3/16/2023 at approximately 8:27 AM, with the Administrator and the DON regarding the discrepancies on the controlled drug sheets and the MAR. The Administrator stated that a Performance Improvement Plan (PIP) had been completed in November 2022 regarding missing narcotics. The Administrator stated the PIP was done for ten days. She stated that staff were also educated during that time. The Administrator reported no errors were documented for November 2022. The Director of Nursing stated a random sample was completed for narcotics in December 2022 and revealed no discrepancies. A policy review was conducted on 3/15/2023 of the Controlled Substance Storage, which was dated January 2018. The policy states that medications included in the Drug Enforcement Administration classification as controlled substances are subject to special handling, storage, disposal, and recordkeeping in the facility in accordance with federal and state laws and regulations. The policy states, The Director of Nursing in collaboration with the Pharmacist will maintain the facility's compliance of controlled substances. The Director of Nursing is to document discrepancies and report to the Administrator any irreconcilable discrepancies. The controlled substance accountability record is kept in the MAR or designated book. The records are submitted to the Director of Nursing and kept on file for five years.

Based on family interview, resident medical record review and review of the facility's policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure that the resident's representative/responsible party were notified of a change in condition for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for Urinary Tract Infections ([CONDITION(S)]) #70. The findings include: On 10/19/2021 an electronic medical record review was conducted for Resident #70. The medical record revealed that Resident #70 began treatment, [MEDICATION(S)] (an intramuscular administered antibiotic) on 10/14/2021 to treat a urinary tract infection ([CONDITION(S)]). Review of nursing progress notes failed to indicate if the resident's responsible party had been notified of the resident's condition and treatment. On 10/20/2021 at approximately 3:15PM a telephone interview was conducted with a family member/responsible party for Resident #70. The family member stated that she found out, by chance, on Saturday (10/16/2021) when she came in to visit - when the nurse mentioned to her that [Resident #70] was being treated for [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . She said she emailed the facility's DON (Director of Nursing) about her concerns and [Resident #70's] treatment, but had not yet heard back from her. A review of the facility's policy and procedure entitled Notification of Change in Condition, indicates When a resident is evaluated or assessed as having a change in condition, the charge nurse will follow through in documenting notification to family/legal representative/resident, the health care provider and other licensed nurses as indicated.

Based on interviews and resident medical record review, the facility failed to ensure the development and implementation of a comprehensive care plan to meet the needs of 1 of 1 sampled residents receiving [CONDITION(S)] services, (87). The findings include: A medical record review was conducted for Resident #87. A review of the Admission Minimum Data Set, (MDS), dated [DATE], under Section O 0100 J revealed the resident received [CONDITION(S)] treatment. A review of the current physician orders [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . Left upper arm shunt. The care plan had interventions to monitor the [CONDITION(S)] access site and to monitor for fluid overload. A review of the care plan failed to reveal an intervention to restrict resident #87's fluids to 1500 cc/day as recommended by the Registered Dietician. A review of the Medication Administration Record, [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] A review of the [CONDITION(S)] Communication Form dated 10/7/2021 revealed the nurse completed the top section with the pre-treatment information; the bottom section for the post treatment assessment was blank. A review of the nurse progress note dated 10/7/2021 failed to reveal documentation of post [CONDITION(S)] assessment, such as temperature, pulse, respirations, blood pressure, assessment of [CONDITION(S)] access site, dressing condition, change in condition of the resident, mental status changes. A review of the [CONDITION(S)] Communication Form dated 10/14/21 revealed the nurse completed the top section with the pre-treatment information; the bottom section for the post treatment assessment was blank. A review of the nurse progress note dated 10/14/2021 failed to reveal documentation of post [CONDITION(S)] assessment, such as temperature, pulse, respirations, blood pressure, assessment of [CONDITION(S)] access site, dressing condition, change in condition of the resident, mental status changes. A review of the [CONDITION(S)] Communication Form dated 10/16/21 revealed the nurse completed the top section with the pre-treatment information; the bottom section for the post treatment assessment was blank. A review of the nurse progress note dated 10/16/2021 failed to reveal documentation of post [CONDITION(S)] assessment, such as temperature, pulse, respirations, blood pressure, assessment of [CONDITION(S)] access site, dressing condition, change in condition of the resident, mental status changes. A review of the [CONDITION(S)] Communication Form dated 10/19/21 revealed the nurse completed the top section with the pre-treatment information; the bottom section for the post treatment assessment was blank. A review of the nurse progress note dated 10/19/2021 failed to reveal documentation of post [CONDITION(S)] assessment, such as temperature, pulse, respirations, blood pressure, assessment of [CONDITION(S)] access site, dressing condition, change in condition of the resident, mental status changes. On 10/19/2021 at approximately 2:32 PM an interview was conducted with staff C, LPN who confirmed Resident #87 goes to [CONDITION(S)] 3 days per week. Staff C stated the facility nurse sends a [CONDITION(S)] communication form to [CONDITION(S)] with the resident, and the [CONDITION(S)] center returns the form with the resident. Staff C stated the post treatment assessment should be documented in the MAR indicated [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . On 10/21/2021 at approximately 9:34 AM an interview was conducted with staff F, LPN who confirmed Resident #87 goes to [CONDITION(S)] and confirmed the post treatment assessment should be documented in the MAR/TAR. On 10/21/21 at approximately 12:00 PM an interview was conducted with staff G, LPN who confirmed the nurses should complete a post [CONDITION(S)] treatment assessment to include vital signs, check the dressing, and should check the bruit/trill. Staff G confirmed the post treatment assessment should be documented on the [CONDITION(S)] communication form or should be documented in the progress note section if the [CONDITION(S)] communication form is not returned by the [CONDITION(S)] center. On 10/20/21 at approximately 3:28 PM an interview was conducted with the Registered Dietician who confirmed Resident #87 is on a liberal diet, but cannot have free fluids, which means Resident #87 cannot have a water pitcher, and is restricted to two beverages on the meal tray. On 10/20/21 at approximately 2:04 PM an interview was conducted with the Director of Nurses, (DON) who confirmed there was no order in Resident #87 medical record for [CONDITION(S)] or post treatment care. On 10/21/21 at approximately 12:16 PM an interview was conducted with the DON who confirmed the nurse should complete the [CONDITION(S)] communication form, post treatment assessment when Resident #87 returns from [CONDITION(S)].

Based on observations, interviews, and policy review the facility failed to prevent the possible spread of disease-causing organisms by keeping resident care equipment clean between uses for 3 of 26 residents. The findings include: On 11/3/2020 at approximately 8:40 AM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) A left the room of Resident #209 after obtaining blood pressure measurements on the resident. CNA A went directly into the room of Resident #157 with the same soiled blood pressure cuff, pulse oximeter, and thermometer. She sanitized her hands but did not stop to clean the equipment after leaving the room of Resident #209. At 8:59 AM, CNA A left the room of Resident #157 with the soiled blood pressure cuff, pulse oximeter, and thermometer and went directly into the room of Resident #208. Once again she sanitized her hands but did not cleanse the blood pressure cuff, pulse oximeter, or thermometer that had been used for residents in rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]. On 11/3/2020 at approximately 9:15, an interview was conducted with CNA A. She was asked about the process for sanitizing the vital sign equipment in between residents. CNA A responded by saying They did not tell me to, today is my first day. She went to ask the nurse where to obtain supplies to wipe down the blood pressure cuff, pulse oximeter, and thermometer. The nurse directed her to sanitizing wipes that were located at the nurse's station down the hall. On 11/4/2020 at 11:36 AM, CNA B pushed a Hoyer lift from Resident #209's room at the end of the hall and parked it against the wall in-between the rooms of Residents #2 and #208. No cleaning or disinfection of the lift was observed. CNA B then re-entered Resident #209's room and exited again, this time pushing the resident in her wheelchair. The surveyor asked CNA B what she used to disinfect the lift with and she said that she would do it when she got back. CNA B and Resident #209 left the hall and CNA B returned approximately ten minutes later to disinfect the lift. On 11/3/2020 at approximately 10:20 AM, the infection control nurse was asked if staff had received any infection control education. The infection control nurse stated that staff are trained regarding infection control processes upon hire. On 11/4/2020 at approximately 12:45 PM, a review of the policy titled Cleaning and Disinfection of Resident-Care Items and Equipment was conducted. The policy stated that durable medical equipment must be cleaned and disinfected before reuse by another resident. The COVID-19 Information Training Sheet was also reviewed. The form reminds employees to properly clean disinfect and limit sharing of medical equipment between residents. On 11/4/2020 at 1:56 PM, the facility's Risk Manager (RM) asked the surveyor if someone didn't clean something due to the surveyor's earlier request for the Cleaning and Disinfection of Resident-Care Items and Equipment policy. They surveyor informed her of concerns related to vital sign equipment not being cleaned or disinfected between residents and a Hoyer lift not being cleaned or disinfected before being placed in the hall for someone else to use. The RM confirmed that if the Hoyer lift is placed in the hall after use without being disinfected then it could be used by someone else before the last staff member who used it returns to clean it.

Based on observations policy review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure refrigerated controlled substances were in a stored in a locked container in the medication room (South Hall). The findings included: On 11/4/20 at approximately 9:46 AM, a tour of the South Hall medication room was conducted as part of medication storage observation. The refrigerator in the medication room was not locked. The refrigerator contained a pharmacy box with medications requiring cold storage. The box was observed to container 4 Class IV substance, [MEDICATION NAME] 2 milligrams per milliliter vials. The box was located in a pull out drawer that was not locked or permanently affixed to the refrigerator (photographic evidence was obtained). On 11/4/20 a review of the policy Storage of Medications policy (revised 4/2019). Section 13 stated Schedule II-V controlled medications are stored separately locked, permanently affixed compartments. On 11/04/20 at approximately 09:48 AM, an interview was conducted with the Unit Manager who stated maintenance has been trying to install a locked cabinet in the refrigerator. On 11/04/20 at approximately 09:56 AM, an interview was conducted with the Maintenance Director who demonstrated the locked shelf cabinet he had for the refrigerator the pharmacy provided the facility. The Maintenance Director stated he was having difficulty installing it as the tacky strip did not stick and then they tried double sided tape per pharmacy recommendation and it also did not work. The plan was to put a lock on the exterior of the refrigerator until they can get a shelf installed inside the refrigerator. .

Based on record review, staff interviews and policy review the facility failed to adequately monitor the use of as needed (PRN) medications for 1 of 5 sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary drugs. (Resident #238) The findings include: Review of the medical recor for resident #238 revealed a physician order [REDACTED]. The Medication Administration Record [REDACTED]. 7 of these 11 administrations of [MEDICATION NAME] failed to document the resident's response to the medication, to include doses given on 2/15/17, 2/10/17, 2/7/17, 2/6/17, 2/5/17, 2/2/17 and 1/31/17. An interview was conducted with employee A (Licensed Practical Nurse) on 2/16/17 at approximately 3:25 PM. She stated after the medication is administered an alert for documentation of effectiveness of the medication will pop up in their electronic medication system after a certain set amount of time has passed. The nurses would have to remove the reminder or not address the alert and then after 24 hours the alert stops. An interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 2/16/17 at approximately 4:30 PM. The DON reviewed the record for resident #238 and confirmed the response to the [MEDICATION NAME] was not documented for 7 of 11 administrations in January and February 2017. The facility policy for documentation principles for inpatient medical records was reviewed on 2/16/17. The policy stated the reason for giving the medication and its effect must be recorded each time a PRN medication is given on the PRN record or in the nurses' notes. Policy revised 12/19/16.

Based on resident interviews, staff interviews, record reviews and policy review the facility failed to notify residents or the responsible party, of a new roommate in accordance with the facility policy for 2 of 2 sampled residents. (#44 and 215) The findings include: 1. An interview was conducted with resident #215 on 6/11/2013 at approximately 11:19 AM. The resident stated the staff did not tell her she was going to have a new roommate. Review of residents #215 and 220 clinical records was conducted on 6/12/2013. Resident #215 resided in room [ROOM NUMBER] B. Resident #215's record revealed no attempts to notify the resident or responsible party of a new roommate who was admitted in the room on 6/9/2013. Resident #220's record revealed she was admitted to room [ROOM NUMBER] A on 6/9/2013. 2. An interview was conducted with resident #44 on 6/11/2013 at approximately 8:37 AM. She stated she did not get any notice of her new roommate. She just came back to the room and she had a new roommate. Review of residents #44 and 223 clinical records was conducted on 6/12/2013. Resident #44 resided in room [ROOM NUMBER] B. The record revealed no attempts to notify the resident or responsible party of a new roommate who was admitted on [DATE]. Resident #223's record revealed she was admitted to room [ROOM NUMBER] A on 5/30/2013. An interview was conducted with the Social Services Director (SSD) on 6/12/2013 at approximately 3:32 PM. The SSD stated resident #44 was gone to a doctor's appointment at the time the new roommate was admitted . She stated the nursing staff are responsible for notification of new roommates on the weekends. An interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 6/13/2013 at approximately 9:05 AM. The DON reviewed the records and confirmed there to be no evidence resident's #44 and 215 were notified of the new roommates. The facility policy for notification on roommate dated 1/1/2013 was reviewed on 6/13/2013. The policy stated it is the facility's policy to inform current residents of the facility when they will be receiving a new roommate prior to roommate's arrival. When unable to notify the resident an attempt will be made to contact responsible party via phone.

Based on observation, staff interviews, record review and policy review the facility failed to implement their infection control policy related to hand washing for 1 of 2 sampled residents on contact isolation. (#1) The findings include: An observation of resident #1 was conducted on 8/13/2012 at approximately 8:50 AM. Employee A was observed assisting resident #1 to drink water from a cup with her ungloved, bare hands. Employee A then assisted resident #7, residing in the room with resident #1, to sit up in the bed and touched resident #7's pillow and bedside table containing her breakfast meal with ungloved, bare hands. Employee A did not wash her hands or wear gloves between contact with resident #1 (on contact isolation) and resident #7 (not on contact isolation). A review of resident #1's clinical record was conducted on 8/13/2012. The history and physical from the hospital dated 8/6/2012 revealed the resident had shingles to the left lumbar dermatomal area. The Administrator also provided a list of residents currently on isolation as of 8/13/2012 indicating resident #1 was on isolation for shingles. An interview was conducted with employee A on 8/13/2012 at approximately 11:07 AM. Employee A stated she should wash her hands between residents and should have washed her hands earlier between resident #1 and #7. An interview was conducted with the Administrator on 8/13/2012 at approximately 11:50 AM. The Administrator stated staff should wash their hands between contact with residents regardless of whether they are on isolation, even if the staff only handled a cup. An interview was conducted on 8/13/2012 at approximately 12:44 PM with employee B (a Licensed Practical Nurse). Employee B stated resident #1 had a patch of skin on her left middle back that was red and open when she observed the area on 8/12/2012. She confirmed the resident was on isolation for shingles. The facility policy for hand washing procedures was reviewed on 8/13/2012. The policy stated : 1.f. wash hands before and after caring for each patient. The facility policy for standard precautions was reviewed on 8/13/2012. The policy stated: 5.a. 1) wash hands between patient contacts. The facility policy for contact precautions was reviewed on 8/13/2012. The policy stated in addition to Standard Precautions, use Contact Precautions for patients known or suspected to be infected or colonized with epidemiological significant microorganisms that can be transmitted by direct contact with the patient or indirect contact with he environmental surfaces or patient care equipment.

Based on observation, staff interview and policy review the facility failed to implement an infection control program to prevent cross-contamination of wounds for 2 of 2 surgical wound care observations. (#1 and 2) The findings include: An observation of surgical wound care for resident #1 was conducted on 5/8/2012 at approximately 11:15 AM. The wound care nurse cleansed her hands and applied clean gloves, removed the dressing, then cleaned her hands and applied clean gloves again. The nurse then applied the new dressing as ordered to the wound and secured the dressing with tape. She then used her now soiled, gloved hand to obtain a marker from her pocket, dated and signed the dressing and returned the marker to her pocket with the same soiled, gloved hand. An observation of surgical wound care for resident #2 was conducted on 5/8/2012 at approximately 12:18 PM. The wound care nurse performed the wound care as ordered. She again applied the new dressing to the wound and secured the dressing with tape. She then used her now soiled, gloved hand to obtain a marker from her pocket, dated and signed the dressing and returned the marker to her pocket with the same soiled, gloved hand. An interview was conducted with the wound care nurse on 5/8/2012 at approximately 12:39 PM. The nurse confirmed she placed her soiled, gloved hand in her pocket to obtain and return the marker. An interview was conducted with Director of Nursing (DON) on 5/8/2012 at approximately 12:49 PM. The DON stated they should not handle the sharpie with the same gloves used to apply new dressing or place soiled gloves in their pockets and could have dated the dressing or tape prior to performing dressing. The facility policy for clean, dry dressing changes was reviewed on 5/8/2012. The policy stated the objective was to prevent contamination of the wound and the principal was to maintain a clean field. The facility policy for infection control and clean dressings was reviewed on 5/8/2012. The policy stated the principle was to prevent cross-infection of personnel and residents from infection transmissible by direct contact with wounds and heavily contaminated articles.

Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to implement the plan of care for 1 of 4 sampled residents at risk for falls. (#8) The findings include: Resident #8 was observed in bed in her room on 3/22/12 at approximately 3:30 PM and 4:14 PM. At both times the bed alarm box was not connected to the alarm cord. The alarm cord was in the floor. At approximately 4:14 PM the Registered Nurse (RN) observed and confirmed these findings. The RN stated the resident utilized a bed alarm. Review of resident #8 record was conducted on 3/22/12. The record revealed a current physician order [REDACTED].