Coastal View Healthcare Center
Ventura, California · CCN 055566
51 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2025.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 167
- Surveys
- 51
- Harm or worse
- 1
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 96
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- THE MANDELBAUM FAMILY
- County
- Ventura
- Medicare-certified since
- 1967
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 5
- Health inspection
- 4
- Staffing
- 4
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded fewer weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 423 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in California.
Last survey on record
Dec 18, 2025
326 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 5.22 | 4.16 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.91 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 24.1% | 37.5% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $8,278 across 1 penalty
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G12.8% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D2877.8% | E616.7% | F12.8% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6413×
Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
- F6563×
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
- F6583×
Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
- F8123×
Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
- F8042×
Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Coastal View Healthcare Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Apr 28, 2025
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe environment and care services for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 3) in accordance with the facility's policies and procedures related to falls by failing to: - Provide Resident 3, after three incidents of falls, a post fall re-assessment and revision of care plan after each fall incident - Notify/alerted a physician that Resident 3 was on an anticoagulant (blood thinner) medication that increased the risk of bleeding. These deficient practices placed Resident 3 at an increased risk of complications. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812May 20, 2022
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe food handling when: 1. TCS foods (Time-Temperature Control for Safety - food that requires time-temperature control to prevent the growth of bacteria) were not consistently and accurately cooled down. 2. Raw poultry was not thawed safely. 3. Food items were unlabeled and/or undated in the refrigerator in the kitchen, and in the refrigerator adjacent to the nursing station that stored resident food brought in from the outside. These failures had the potential to place the residents at risk for developing a foodborne illness. Findings: 1. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF805Dec 18, 2025
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the pureed lasagna recipe was prepared according to facility policy when the consistency was not smooth and contained lumps. Dietary Supervisor (DS) confirmed there were six residents (Residents 105, 42, 53, 70, 104, and 91) with physician-ordered puree diets who had potential to receive an inappropriate food texture. This failure had the potential to result in choking and aspiration (the inhalation of food or liquid into the lungs) for residents with swallowing difficulties. During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/16/25 starting at 11:15 a.m. with head cook (HC) in the kitchen, HC was observed preparing and arranging lunch meal trays in the hot box. HC stated the meals were ready to be served. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF658Oct 17, 2024
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain a physician order for siderails for one of 21 sampled residents (Resident 25). This failure had the potential for Resident 25 to experience negative outcomes, while receiving care in the facility. Findings: During a review of Resident 24's, Face Sheet (FS), dated 10/15/22, the FS indicated, Resident 25 was a [AGE] year-old, who was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with admitting diagnoses including dementia (the loss of cognitive functioning, thinking, remembering, and reasoning), and chronic kidney disease (kidneys are damaged and can't filter blood properly). […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF804Oct 17, 2024
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure to provide daily nutritional needs were met for 72 of 92 residents when they failed to follow the recipe card for making meatballs for the meatball sub sandwiches being served to the residents on regular diets. This failure resulted in food with inadequate nutritional value and had the potential to result in weight loss of residents. Findings: On 10/14/24, at 9:05 a.m. during an interview with a facility cook (Cook 1) and the Dietary Supervisor (DS) and a concurrent observation in the kitchen, [NAME] 1 was observed preparing food for lunch. A review of the menu for October 14-20, 2024, revealed a meatball sandwich was to be served for part of the lunch meal on 10/14/24. […]
Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 167 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Dec 18, 2025Standard6 findings
- Apr 28, 2025Complaint4 findings · 1 harm
- Feb 27, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Feb 26, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Dec 30, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Oct 17, 2024Standard7 findings
- Sep 10, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Jan 25, 2024Complaint1 finding
Show the 43 earlier surveys
- Nov 8, 2023Complaint2 findings
- Mar 28, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Oct 25, 2022Complaint1 finding
- May 20, 2022Standard12 findings
- Jan 7, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Jul 24, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Apr 9, 2021Complaint3 findings
- Apr 7, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Sep 4, 2020Complaint1 finding
- Jun 3, 2020Complaint1 finding
- Jun 2, 2020Complaint1 finding
- May 18, 2020Complaint3 findings
- Apr 14, 2020Complaint1 finding
- Dec 20, 2019Standard and complaint6 findings
- Nov 26, 2019Complaint1 finding
- May 9, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Dec 6, 2018Standard10 findings
- Feb 20, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Dec 13, 2017Standard9 findings
- Oct 5, 2017Complaint1 finding
- Jul 28, 2017Complaint1 finding
- May 9, 2017Complaint1 finding
- Nov 18, 2016Standard10 findings
- Sep 27, 2016Complaint1 finding
- Jul 6, 2016Complaint1 finding
- Jun 2, 2016Complaint2 findings
- Oct 23, 2015Standard16 findings
- Sep 29, 2015Complaint1 finding
- Sep 21, 2015Complaint1 finding
- Jun 17, 2015Complaint1 finding
- May 6, 2015Complaint1 finding
- May 5, 2015Complaint3 findings
- Nov 6, 2014Standard16 findings
- Sep 25, 2014Complaint2 findings
- May 13, 2014Complaint1 finding
- Feb 5, 2014—1 finding
- Nov 8, 2013—7 findings
- Aug 30, 2013—1 finding
- Jul 2, 2013—1 finding
- Mar 18, 2013—1 finding
- Nov 29, 2012—2 findings
- Nov 21, 2012—11 findings
- Nov 22, 2011—5 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction