Cimarron Nursing Center
Kingfisher, Oklahoma · CCN 375102
29 surveys since 2011, 14 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 167
- Surveys
- 29
- Harm or worse
- 14
- Immediate jeopardy
- 2
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 92
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- BGM ESTATE
- County
- Kingfisher · rural
- Medicare-certified since
- 1989
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 5
- Health inspection
- 5
- Staffing
- 4
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 68 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Oklahoma.
Last survey on record
Feb 5, 2025
642 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.96 | 3.65 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.45 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 44.3% | 55.0% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D233.3% | E466.7% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Cimarron Nursing Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, patternF580Aug 17, 2021
Based on record review, and family and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to notify the physician and family of a change in the resident's condition for three (#53, 54 and #164) of three sampled residents reviewed for notification. Resident #164 had an incident and the physician and family were not notified until four days later. The resident had a fractured tibia and fibula. The facility identified 65 residents resided in the facility. Findings: 1. Resident #164 was admitted with diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . A care plan, dated 05/01/20, documented, .Transfer using overhead lift and assist of 2 person to reduce risk for falls . […]
- Actual harm, patternF600Aug 17, 2021
Based on record review and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were free from physical abuse and neglect. This affected four (#26, 42, 54, and #164) of four sampled residents who were reviewed for abuse/neglect. Resident #42 sustained a [CONDITION(S)] during an improper transfer. This had the potential to affect 65 residents that resided in the facility. Findings: An abuse policy, revised on 01/2018, documented, .It is the responsibility of all facility staff to prohibit resident abuse or neglect in any form and to report in accordance with the law any incident/event in which there is cause to believe a resident's physical or mental health or welfare has been or may be adversely affected by abuse or neglect caused by another person . […]
- Actual harm, patternF684Aug 17, 2021
Based on record review and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure: ~ residents were assessed/monitored after an accident. This affected two (#54, and #164) of three sampled residents who were reviewed for falls/accidents; This resulted in resident #164 sustaining a tibia/fibula fracture. ~residents were assessed/monitored and interventions placed for residents with hypertension, change of condition and notification. This affected one (#54) of three sampled residents whose clinical records were reviewed for changes of condition; ~a resident's venous wound was monitored and treatment provided as ordered for one (#214) of three sampled residents reviewed for wounds; and ~assess/monitor and intervene for finger stick blood sugars for one (#114) of five sampled… […]
- Actual harm, patternF689Aug 17, 2021
Based on record review and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure proper transfers were completed for three (#42, 54 and #164) of three sampled residents who were reviewed for accidents. Resident #164 was improperly transferred which resulted with the resident's tibia and fibula being fractured. The facility identified 65 residents who resided in the facility, ten residents who transferred with a Hoyer lift and three residents who transferred with a sit to stand. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF563Aug 17, 2021
Based on observation, record review, resident, family and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident's right to receive unrestricted visitation for seven (#12, 26, 39, 48, 49, 53 and #63) of seven residents and a confidential resident council interview reviewed for visitation. The facility identified 65 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: A visitation policy, dated 03/29/21, documented, .To allow visitation to occur between Residents and outside personnel (family, friends) in a safe manner following designated infection control manners in a controlled environment .Policy .will allow visitation to Residents of our community following the guidelines set forth by CDC [Centers for Disease Control and Prevention] and the Department of Health and… […]
Read 30 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 30 of 167 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Feb 5, 2025Standard2 findings
- Dec 2, 2022Standard4 findings
- Sep 3, 2021Infection control1 finding
- Aug 17, 2021Standard and complaint17 findings · 4 harm
- Oct 21, 2020Infection control2 findings
- Sep 30, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Sep 1, 2020Complaint2 findings
- Jul 8, 2020Infection control1 finding
Show the 21 earlier surveys
- Feb 10, 2020Complaint5 findings · 2 harm
- Dec 26, 2019Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
- Dec 2, 2019Complaint4 findings
- Oct 7, 2019Standard and complaint15 findings
- May 7, 2019Complaint2 findings
- Aug 7, 2018Standard15 findings · 1 harm
- May 12, 2017Standard14 findings
- Feb 7, 2017Complaint1 finding
- Jan 19, 2017Complaint2 findings
- Mar 24, 2016Standard12 findings
- Nov 30, 2015Complaint1 finding
- Mar 3, 2015Standard1 finding
- Jan 28, 2015Standard and complaint12 findings
- Dec 18, 2014Complaint4 findings · 1 harm
- Apr 8, 2014Complaint1 finding
- Feb 22, 2014—4 findings
- Dec 4, 2013—13 findings · 2 harm
- Sep 4, 2013—3 findings
- Jan 17, 2013—9 findings
- May 9, 2012—1 finding
- Nov 4, 2011—15 findings · 3 harm
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction