Deficiency Index

Chippewa Manor Nursing and Rehabilitation

Chippewa Falls, Wisconsin · CCN 525419

12 surveys since 2011, 3 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
41
Surveys
12
Harm or worse
3
Immediate jeopardy
1
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy1

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file9/12

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
50
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
Independent
County
Chippewa
Medicare-certified since
1989

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
4
Staffing
5
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=13, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Mar 24, 2026

230 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.703.73
Registered-nurse hours per resident day1.52—
Annual nurse turnover45.2%45.7%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG19.1%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD654.5%E19.1%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C327.3%
CMS’s current file: 11 of the 41 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6232×

    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.

  • F6252×

    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.

  • F6381×

    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.

  • F6401×

    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.

  • F6861×

    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Chippewa Manor Nursing and Rehabilitation, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF678Jul 26, 2021

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have a system in place to verify code status desires of Resident (R) and ensure Resident wishes were accurately identified in the medical record for a Resident wishing to receive emergency care for 1 of 13 sampled Residents, R36. R36's CPR consent form, dated and signed by her on [DATE], indicates R36 as a full code. The information in the consent form was not transcribed into the medical record. When R36 was found pulseless and nonbreathing, staff did not have accurate information to know to begin CPR. Facility failure to follow the wishes identified in the consent form and begin cardiopulmonary resuscitation created a finding of immediate jeopardy that began on [DATE]. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF686Mar 24, 2026

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that 3 of 4 residents (R) reviewed for pressure injuries (PI) (R48, R47, and R51) received care consistently with professional standards of practice to prevent further deterioration and promote healing of an existing PI. R48 and R47 are being cited at (actual harm/isolated). R51 is being cited at (potential for minimal harm/isolated).R48 and R47 were at risk for PI development. The facility failed to provide adequate interventions to prevent PI development, and did not complete comprehensive weekly assessment with staging of the PI. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF880Jan 29, 2025

    Based on observation and interview, the facility did not maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. This affected 5 out of 5 residents (R). (R29, R10, R24, R37, and R7) Laundry aide (LA) D did not sanitize hands in between delivering clean linens to R29, R10, R24, R37, and R7. Findings include: The facility policy, titled Laundry and Bedding, Soiled, revised September 2022, states: .Transport: #6. Clean linen is protected from dust and soiling during transport and storage to ensure cleanliness . On 01/27/25 at 10:17 AM, Surveyor observed LA D carry residents' clothes up the stairs to the 1st floor to clean linen cart. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF640Mar 24, 2026

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was transmitted within 14 days of completion to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) for one of five residents (R7) reviewed for MDS.R7 expired in the facility on [DATE] with hospice services. R7's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for a death in the facility was not submitted to the CMS System. On [DATE], Surveyor requested the facility's policy related to MDS assessments; the facility did not provide Surveyor with this policy. Per CMS requirements, within 14 days after a facility completes a resident's assessment, the facility must electronically transmit encoded, accurate, and complete MDS data to the CMS System, including a resident's death. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF698Mar 24, 2026

    Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that a resident who requires dialysis receives such service, consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 of 1 residents (R51) reviewed for dialysis.The facility failed to provide ongoing assessment of R51's condition and monitoring for complications before and after dialysis treatments.On 03/23/26 at 3:30 PM, Director of Nursing (DON) B reported the facility did not have a policy. On 03/24/26, DON B provided Surveyor with a policy titled Hemodialysis Policy and Procedure. DON B stated the policy was created on 03/24/26. […]

Read 21 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 21 of 41 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Mar 24, 2026Standard3 findings · 1 harm
  • Jan 29, 2025Standard4 findings
  • Nov 8, 2023Standard4 findings
  • Jul 26, 2021Standard2 findings · 1 harm
  • Jul 24, 2019Standard1 finding
  • Aug 9, 2018Standard2 findings
  • Aug 2, 2017Standard2 findings
  • Sep 1, 2016Standard2 findings
Show the 4 earlier surveys
  • Sep 24, 2014Standard5 findings
  • Nov 14, 2013—5 findings · 1 harm
  • Oct 24, 2012—2 findings
  • Aug 18, 2011—9 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction