Chelsea Retirement Community
Chelsea, Michigan · CCN 235021
22 surveys since 2011, 2 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 89
- Surveys
- 22
- Harm or worse
- 2
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 85
- Ownership
- Non profit - Corporation
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Washtenaw
- Medicare-certified since
- 1967
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 5
- Health inspection
- 5
- Staffing
- 5
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded fewer weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 96 facilities of 66–99 beds in Michigan.
Last survey on record
Aug 6, 2025
460 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.44 | 4.86 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.80 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 37.4% | 39.4% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1184.6% | E— | F215.4% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6442×
Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
- F6562×
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
- F8122×
Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
- F5611×
Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
- F6231×
Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Chelsea Retirement Community, in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Aug 6, 2025
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure opened food items were dated, and had a use by date in a current facility census of 83 residents.Findings Included:During the initial kitchen tour on 8/04/2025 at 9:15 AM with Dietary Director (DD) J in the [NAME] one kitchen it was observed in one of the refrigerators a bag of opened English muffins that did not have a date that the muffins were opened nor a dated that the muffins were to either be used by (UBD-use by date) or discarded. Further observation revealed that in the same refrigerator there were six loaves of opened bread that did not have the date the loaves were opened nor a UBD. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812May 25, 2023
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to effectively clean and maintain food service equipment effecting 73 residents, resulting in the increased likelihood for cross-contamination and bacterial harborage. Findings include: On 05/22/23 at 09:26 A.M., An initial tour of the main food production kitchen was conducted with Chef Manager C. The following items were noted: The South Bend conventional oven(s) exterior surfaces were observed soiled with accumulated and encrusted food residue. The South Bend griddle and side plates were observed soiled with accumulated and encrusted food residue. The MagiKitch'n char broiler backsplash and side plates were observed with accumulated and encrusted food residue, adjacent to the two grate plates. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF725Jun 29, 2022
This citation is related to Intake #MI 624, #MI 361, #MI 567, #MI 282. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide sufficient staff to meet the needs of six sampled residents (#5, #53, #60, #66, #301 and #425), 11 confidential resident interviews, and one confidential family interview within the facility population of 74 residents. This deficient practice resulted in actual and potential avoidable episodes of incontinence, actual and potential delayed assistance for care such as transfer to bed (#310) and with walking (#66) and frustration and helplessness with call lights going unanswered and needs not being addressed. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF550Jun 29, 2022
This citation pertains to intake MI 624, MI 361, and MI 567 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide dignified care including timely answering of call lights and/or not providing medical supplies for five Residents (#5, #53, #60, #66, and #425) of 19 residents and six Confidential Residents reviewed for dignity and resident rights. This deficient practice resulted in feelings of frustration, helplessness, and incontinence episodes. Findings include: Resident #53 Review of Resident #53's Minimum Data Set (MDS) significant change assessment, dated 6/03/22, revealed Resident #53 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF585Jun 29, 2022
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an atmosphere of openness to voice concerns and grievances without reprisal and failed to act on grievances as expressed by 11 confidential residents requesting anonymity in a population of 74 facility residents. This deficient practice resulted in residents choosing not to express grievances regarding care and perceived staff shortages due to feelings of possible retaliation and resulted in a potential for unmet care needs and a lack of grievance resolution. Findings include: A confidential group meeting took place on 6/28/22 at 3:30 PM, and it was noted all the residents at the meeting stressed their strong desire to remain anonymous. […]
Read 22 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 22 of 89 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jul 16, 2026Standard4 findings
- Aug 6, 2025Standard2 findings
- Aug 8, 2024Standard2 findings
- May 25, 2023Standard9 findings
- May 9, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Jun 29, 2022Standard and complaint8 findings
- Jan 30, 2020Standard9 findings
- Dec 19, 2018Standard5 findings
Show the 14 earlier surveys
- Sep 26, 2018Complaint2 findings
- Nov 15, 2017Standard and complaint12 findings · 1 harm
- Dec 6, 2016Standard3 findings
- Feb 10, 2016Complaint1 finding
- Dec 2, 2015Standard4 findings
- Mar 19, 2015Complaint1 finding
- Jan 8, 2015Standard5 findings
- Oct 31, 2013—6 findings
- Sep 7, 2012—4 findings
- Jun 12, 2012—1 finding
- Jan 31, 2012—1 finding · 1 harm
- Dec 6, 2011—1 finding
- Nov 3, 2011—7 findings
- Apr 4, 2011—1 finding
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction