Deficiency Index

Chelsea Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center

Goochland, Virginia · CCN 495236

18 surveys since 2011, 3 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
177
Surveys
18
Harm or worse
3
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2024
’11’15’20’24
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse3

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file13/18

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
84
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
MARQUIS HEALTH SERVICES
County
Goochland
Medicare-certified since
1991

CMS ratings

Overall
3
Health inspection
2
Staffing
2
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 39 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Virginia.

Last survey on record

Dec 10, 2024

699 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.123.42
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.56—
Annual nurse turnover45.5%47.0%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$10,033 across 1 penalty
Abuse icon
Flagged by CMS on Care Compare

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG12.9%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD2779.4%E38.8%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C38.8%
CMS’s current file: 34 of the 177 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6233×

    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.

  • F5502×

    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.

  • F6002×

    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.

  • F6222×

    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.

  • F6562×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Chelsea Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF600Sep 12, 2024

    Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to protect a resident from abuse by another resident, resulting in harm, a fractured wrist, for one of 32 residents in the survey sample, Residents #32 and #16. The findings include: The facility synopsis of the event, dated, 3/22/24, documented, Resident to Resident, separated, abut policy initiated. Residents involved: (Resident #32 and Resident #16). The facility synopsis of the event, dated 3/29/24, documented in part, (R32) was in the dining room on the evening of March 22nd around 5:10 p.m. He was watching a program in the dining room, as he often does. When (R16) came into the dining room, he changed the TV channel without first, communicating with (R32). […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF658Sep 12, 2024

    Based on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to follow professional standards of care for one of 32 residents in the survey sample, Resident #19. The findings include: 1.a. For Resident #19 (R19), the facility staff failed to document progress notes in a timely manner A review of R19's clinical record revealed three progress notes related to R19 with an effective date between two to four days prior to when the note was actually written. These notes were: On 8/26/24, LPN (licensed practical nurse) #2 wrote a note about what she observed and assessed on 8/22/24. She documented this as a Late Entry. On 8/26/24, RN (registered nurse) #1 wrote a note about what she observed and assessed on 8/23/24. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF657Dec 13, 2022

    Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to review and revise the comprehensive care plans for three of 33 residents in the survey sample, Residents #11 (R11), #29 (R29), #30 (R30). The findings include: 1. For R11, the facility staff failed to review and revised the comprehensive care plan when psychoactive medications were discontinued. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, the resident scored a three out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score, indicating the resident severely cognitively impaired for making daily decisions. In Section N - Medications, the resident was coded as receiving anti-depressants for seven days of the look back period. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF839Dec 13, 2022

    Based on staff interview, facility document review and employee record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to evidence maintenance of required certification for four of five CNA (certified nursing assistants), CNA #1, CNA #2, CNA #3 and CNA #4 The findings include: The facility staff failed to provide the evidence of required certification verification prior to expiration, for four CNAs that were employed for greater than on year. During the Sufficient and Competent Staffing facility task review conducted on [DATE] at 9:30 AM the following CNA employee records and certifications were reviewed and revealed the following: 1. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF580Dec 10, 2024

    Based on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to notify the provider of a resident's change in condition in a timely manner for one of seven residents in the survey sample, Resident #1. The findings include: For Resident #1 (R1), the facility staff failed to notify the physician in a timely manner of neurological status changes after a fall. A review of R1's clinical record revealed the following progress notes: 3/31/24 at 7:50 p.m. Falls/Trauma .Altered level of consciousness .Patient initial evaluation post fall stable VS (vital signs) WNL (within normal limits). Patient c/o (complained of) pain to left side of head in area of hematoma. Neuro (neurological check) #4 pupils unequal, non-reactive. […]

Read 21 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 21 of 177 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Dec 10, 2024Complaint3 findings
  • Sep 12, 2024Standard10 findings · 1 harm
  • Sep 28, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 13, 2022Standard and complaint10 findings
  • Aug 17, 2021Standard10 findings
  • Apr 17, 2019Standard32 findings
  • Mar 1, 2018Standard12 findings
  • Jul 7, 2017Complaint4 findings
Show the 10 earlier surveys
  • Feb 9, 2017Standard7 findings
  • Dec 21, 2016Complaint7 findings
  • Feb 4, 2016Standard18 findings
  • Apr 29, 2015Standard1 finding
  • Jan 30, 2015Standard and complaint27 findings · 1 harm
  • Jan 31, 2014Standard and complaint12 findings · 1 harm
  • Jan 17, 2013—6 findings
  • Aug 14, 2012—3 findings
  • Jan 27, 2012—10 findings
  • Feb 17, 2011—4 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction