Chateau at Moorings Park, The
Naples, Florida · CCN 105396
7 surveys since 2011, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 11
- Surveys
- 7
- Harm or worse
- 0
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 106
- Ownership
- Non profit - Corporation
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Collier
- Medicare-certified since
- 1981
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 5
- Health inspection
- 4
- Staffing
- 5
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=5, floor 20).
Last survey on record
Sep 3, 2025
432 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 5.45 | 3.59 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 1.49 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 10.9% | 37.9% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D360.0% | E120.0% | F120.0% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Chateau at Moorings Park, The, in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Jan 30, 2025
Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food according to professional standards for food service safety and sanitary conditions and to prevent foodborne illnesses for 2 of the 2 observations of the main kitchen. The findings included: A review of the National Serve Safe dated September 2012, titled Cleaning and Sanitizing Practices That Will Prevent Cross Contamination, showed the following: To prevent cross-contamination from surfaces, the correct cleaning solution and sanitizing procedures must be followed. Cross-contamination can occur when wiping clots are not stored in a sanitizer solution between uses, and the sanitizing solutions are not at the required levels to sanitize objects. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF657Jan 30, 2025
Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to reassess the effectiveness of the interventions and revise the care plan to meet the needs of the resident for 2 (Residents #7 and #36) of 4 resident sampled for falls and accidents. The findings included: Review of the facility's policy titled, Fall Interventions with an effective date of 08/2003 included in part the following: 7. The care plan interventions are reviewed and revised accordingly to help minimize the risk of a recurring fall or fall with injury. 8. The Falling Star program includes: any residents that have fallen twice in a month or two consecutive months in a row; any resident may be added to the program at the discretion of the interdisciplinary team. They will be identified by: a. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF609Sep 3, 2025
Based on record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to report alleged violations which could constitute abuse or neglect to the State Survey Agency for 1, (Resident #99), of 3 sampled residents. The findings included:Review of the clinical record revealed Resident #99 was an [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia, atrial fibrillation, anxiety, aspiration, muscle weakness, depression, pain, dysphagia, restless leg syndrome, sleep apnea, and hemiplegia. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented the resident was dependent for all care and was non-ambulatory. The MDS noted the residents' cognitive skills for daily decision making were intact. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF607Aug 20, 2025
Based on review of the facility's policies and procedures and staff interviews, the facility failed to protect the health, welfare, and rights of each resident by failing to ensure 1 (The Director of Facilities) of 3 staff reviewed was eligible for employment based on background screening and facility roster.The findings included:Review of facility procedure for background screenings which stated, Not Eligible Status: Notify the HR (Human Resources) Representative that the results came back as: Not Eligible. We can't continue with the hiring process.Review of facility policy titled Background Screening which stated, Background checks serve as an important part of the selection process at the company. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF761Jan 30, 2025
Based on observation, record review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure all medications are secured at all times for 1 (Resident #35) of 17 sampled residents. The findings included: Review of the facility's policy titled, Medications -Central Storage of with an effective date of [DATE] included in part the following: All medication for which the facility is responsible for administering or providing assistance are labeled with the resident's name and the manufacturers label with directions for use kept with the medications. The resident may self-administer medications unless the health assessment or physician's orders specifically requires medications to be administered. […]
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Sep 3, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Aug 20, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Jan 30, 2025Standard3 findings
- May 16, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Nov 8, 2017Standard2 findings
- Nov 15, 2013—2 findings
- Sep 30, 2011—1 finding
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction