Deficiency Index

Chapel Pointe at Carlisle

Carlisle, Pennsylvania · CCN 395923

16 surveys since 2011, 3 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
50
Surveys
16
Harm or worse
3
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2025
’11’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse3

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file15/16

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
59
Ownership
Non profit - Church related
Chain
Independent
County
Cumberland
Medicare-certified since
1994

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
5
Staffing
5
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=13, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Mar 13, 2025

606 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day5.334.80
Registered-nurse hours per resident day1.20—
Annual nurse turnover14.5%31.9%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD2100.0%E—F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 2 of the 50 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Chapel Pointe at Carlisle, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF657May 11, 2023

    Based on clinical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to review and revise the resident plan of care for three of 18 residents reviewed (Residents 24, 46, and 55). Findings include: Review of Resident 24's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included major depressive disorder (mental health disorder characterized by persistently depressed mood or loss of interest in daily activities), anxiety disorder (mental health disorder characterized by feelings of worry, anxiety, or fear that are strong enough to interfere with one's daily activities), and Stage 3 Pressure Ulcer (a full thickness tissue loss wound where the tissue just under the skin may be visible, but no bone, tendon, or muscle is exposed) of the sacral region (the portion of the spine… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812May 11, 2023

    Based on observations, review of facility policy, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to store and serve food in a safe and sanitary manner in the main dietary kitchen and in two of three nourishment pantries (Main dietary kitchen, fell owship Place Pantry, and Family Place Pantry). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Food Storage, last reviewed July 13, 2022, revealed the policy stated At times food may be opened from its original storage container but not used - these unused food items may be returned to storage if completely wrapped or placed in appropriate storage container with lid to prevent infestation. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF637Mar 13, 2025

    Based on clinical record review, staff interview, and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services publication, it was determined that the facility failed to complete a Significant Change Minimum Data Set after a significant change was identified for one of two residents reviewed for hospice services (Resident 45). Findings include: Review of Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services' Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual, version 1.19.1 (instructions on when and how to complete the Minimum Data Set), revealed it stated, An [Significant Change in Status Assessment; a.k.a. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF641Mar 13, 2025

    Based on clinical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for two of 17 residents reviewed (Residents 7 and 20). Findings Include: Review of Resident 7's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included congestive heart failure (CHF- a chronic condition in which the heart doesn't pump blood as well as it should) and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (when the body cannot use insulin correctly and sugar builds up in the blood). […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF641May 11, 2023

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for two of 18 residents reviewed (Residents 29 and 46). Findings Include: Review of Resident 29's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included congestive heart failure (CHF- a chronic condition in which the heart doesn't pump blood as well as it should), major depressive disorder (a mental health disorder characterized by persistently depressed mood or loss of interest in activities, causing significant impairment in daily life), and anxiety. […]

Read 22 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 22 of 50 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Mar 13, 2025Standard2 findings
  • May 11, 2023Standard4 findings
  • Jun 2, 2022Standard2 findings
  • Apr 22, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 16, 2021Standard4 findings
  • Oct 17, 2019Standard2 findings
  • Sep 6, 2018Standard1 finding
  • Oct 5, 2017Standard2 findings
Show the 8 earlier surveys
  • Sep 9, 2016Standard1 finding
  • Aug 12, 2016Complaint7 findings · 2 harm
  • Nov 9, 2015Standard2 findings
  • Oct 21, 2014Standard5 findings
  • Sep 5, 2013—7 findings
  • Oct 12, 2012—2 findings
  • Sep 15, 2011—7 findings · 1 harm
  • Aug 11, 2011—1 finding

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction