Pickering Manor Home
Newtown, Pennsylvania · CCN 395597
15 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2018.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 29
- Surveys
- 15
- Harm or worse
- 1
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 47
- Ownership
- Non profit - Corporation
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Bucks
- Medicare-certified since
- 1984
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 3
- Health inspection
- 4
- Staffing
- 1
- Quality measures
- 3
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=10, floor 20).
Last survey on record
Sep 18, 2025
417 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Annual nurse turnover | 47.3% | 31.9% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D250.0% | E125.0% | F125.0% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Pickering Manor Home, in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Oct 31, 2024
Based on policy review, staff interview, and observation, it was determined that the facility failed to properly store food and maintain sanitary conditions in the main kitchen and in the rehabilitation unit kitchen. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy entitled, Refrigerated Storage Checkpoints, dated [DATE], revealed that foods were to be labeled, dated and used by the use-by date or discarded. An interview with the Director of Dining Services (DDS) on [DATE], at 10:15 a.m., revealed all opened food products were to have an opening date noted on them. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF689Sep 18, 2025
Based on clinical record review and review of facility documentation it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that staff provided adequate supervision and assistance in order to prevent repeated falls for one of four sampled residents who were at risk for falls. (Resident 42)Findings includeClinical record review revealed that Resident 42 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had diagnoses that included supranuclear palsy, (neuro-degenerate disease involving a gradual deterioration of the brain), Parkinson's disease, cognitive communication deficit, anxiety, difficulty walking and unsteadiness on her feet. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Jan 6, 2022
Based on observation, facility policy review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to store food under sanitary conditions on one of three nursing units (skilled unit). Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled, Nursing Station Refrigerators, dated July 20, 2021, revealed that the unit refrigerators were to be maintained in a sanitary condition with a temperature range of 41 degrees Fahrenheit or lower. Observations of the West Wing unit refrigerator on January 4, 2022, revealed an internal temperature of 50 degrees Fahrenheit at 11:53 a.m., and 49 degrees Fahrenheit at 1:30 p.m. On January 5, 2022, at 10:15 a.m., the temperature was 49 degrees Fahrenheit. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF684Sep 18, 2025
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement physician's orders for one of 13 sampled residents. (Resident 1)Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 1 had diagnoses that included congestive heart failure, atrial fibrillation, and hypertension. A physician's order dated July 1, 2025, directed staff to weigh the resident daily and to notify the physician if there was a two to three pound (lb.) gain in 24 hours or a five pound gain in a week. A review of the care plan indicated that Resident 1 was at risk for fluid overload due to congestive heart failure. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF550Nov 8, 2023
Based on clinical record review and observation, it was determined that the facility failed to provide assistance with dining in a manner that promoted and maintained dignity to one of 13 sampled residents. (Resident 10) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 10 had diagnoses that included dementia. According to the Minimum Data Set assessment, dated October 31, 2023, the resident was cognitively impaired and required set up assistance from staff to eat. Review of Resident 10's current care plan revealed that staff was to provide necessary assistance at meals. Observations during breakfast on November 7, 2023, and lunch on November 6 and 7, 2023, revealed the resident was eating her meals with her fingers. […]
Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 29 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Sep 18, 2025Standard2 findings
- Oct 31, 2024Standard1 finding
- Nov 8, 2023Standard1 finding
- Dec 29, 2022Standard3 findings
- Jan 6, 2022Standard2 findings
- Jan 21, 2021Standard1 finding
- Aug 16, 2019Standard3 findings
- Jul 27, 2018Standard3 findings · 1 harm
Show the 7 earlier surveys
- Aug 4, 2017Standard2 findings
- Sep 9, 2016Standard2 findings
- Aug 27, 2015Standard1 finding
- Sep 18, 2014Standard1 finding
- Aug 22, 2013—2 findings
- Sep 7, 2012—4 findings
- Aug 25, 2011—1 finding
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction