Cedar River Healthcare Center
Renton, Washington · CCN 505532
8 surveys since 2021, 2 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 40
- Surveys
- 8
- Harm or worse
- 2
- Immediate jeopardy
- 1
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 60
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- PACS GROUP
- County
- King
- Medicare-certified since
- 2019
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 3
- Health inspection
- 2
- Staffing
- 5
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 26 for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in Washington.
Last survey on record
Jun 25, 2026
137 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 5.18 | 3.93 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 1.13 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 39.3% | 43.5% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $74,815 across 1 penalty
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L13.2% |
| Actual harm | G13.2% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D2064.5% | E722.6% | F26.5% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6584×
Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
- F5502×
Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
- F6452×
PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
- F6862×
Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
- F5781×
Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Cedar River Healthcare Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, widespreadF678Aug 13, 2024
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure staff performed Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR- an emergency procedure consisting of chest compressions combined with giving breaths of air when the resident's heart stops and they stop breathing) to 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for unexpected death in the facility. The failure to ensure staff followed the facility's policy for CPR including staffs ability to accurately assess signs of irreversible death, immediately verify the Physician's Order (PO) for CPR status, immediately access the resident's POLST form (Physician Order for Life-Sustaining Treatment - a document the resident completes to declare their wishes for CPR or No CPR), initiate CPR, communicate effectively to the 911 operator,… […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF550Aug 13, 2024
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to treat residents with dignity and respect and provide a dignified existence that promoted quality of life for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 2) reviewed for resident rights. The failure to have a process for staff to provide a comfortable environment for residents after the death of a roommate, placed residents at risk of feeling scared, unsafe, distressed, and have a diminished quality of life. Resident 2 was harmed, using the reasonable person concept, when their roommate (Resident 1) died and they were left in the same room with the deceased resident from 10:00 PM on [DATE] until 5:30 PM on [DATE], 19.5 hours. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF868Apr 21, 2025
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) committee that included the required participants. This failure put residents at risk for unmet care needs due to ongoing non-compliance with federal regulations and detracted from the interdisciplinary effectiveness of the team. Findings included . <Facility Policy> According to a December 2024 facility Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement [QAPI] Committee policy, the committee would meet monthly and listed the staff to serve on the committee which included the: Administrator; Director of Nursing Services; Medical Director, and infection control representative. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF726Aug 13, 2024
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure nursing staff and nursing aide staff had the appropriate competencies and skill sets to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physician, mental and psychosocial well-being of each resident according to the facility assessment, resident-specific assessments and resident plans of care for 11 of 11 staff (Staff K, L, E, M, H - Certified Nursing Assistants and Staff C, N, G, D, O, P - Licensed Nurses) reviewed for competency. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF825Apr 20, 2026
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure specialized rehabilitative services were provided as determined by the physician's order and the residents' plan of care for 2 of 3 residents (Residents 1 & 2) reviewed for Occupational Therapy (OT) services. This failure placed residents at risk of not attaining, maintaining, or restoring their highest practicable level of physical, mental, functional, and psychosocial well-being. Findings included . <Facility Assessment>Review of the updated February 2026 Facility Assessment showed the facility would conduct, document, and review their facility-wide assessment to consider their resident population and the resources needed to care for these residents. […]
Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 40 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Aug 21, 2026Complaint2 findings
- Jun 25, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Apr 20, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Apr 21, 2025Standard12 findings
- Aug 13, 2024Complaint6 findings · 2 harm
- Mar 22, 2024Standard8 findings
- Feb 24, 2023Standard3 findings
- May 13, 2021Standard7 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction