Deficiency Index

Carrie Elligson Gietner Health Care Center

Saint Louis, Missouri · CCN 265668

24 surveys since 2010, 15 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
152
Surveys
24
Harm or worse
15
Immediate jeopardy
5
The record, 2010–2026
’10’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy5

Findings at the most serious level CMS records. 1 of these were recorded as past non-compliance — corrected before the survey.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file12/24

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
130
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
RELIANT CARE MANAGEMENT
County
St. Louis City
Medicare-certified since
1997

CMS ratings

Overall
1
Health inspection
1
Staffing
1
Quality measures
2

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 75 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in Missouri.

Last survey on record

Jul 20, 2026

112 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day2.483.15
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.20—

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$236,408 across 5 penalties
Payment denials
2

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ23.1%K—L—
Actual harmG710.9%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD2640.6%E2335.9%F57.8%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B11.6%C—
CMS’s current file: 64 of the 152 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6896×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

  • F8125×

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

  • F5843×

    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.

  • F6563×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

  • F6843×

    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Carrie Elligson Gietner Health Care Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Jul 20, 2026

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to initiate a Code Purple (protocol for resident who eloped from an off-site location) in accordance with facility policy for one resident (Resident #1) who signed him/herself out for an appointment on 07/14/26 and did not return to the facility. The resident signed him/herself out of the facility on 07/14/26 at 12:58 P.M. with an expected return time of 4:30 P.M., but the resident did not return. Staff were aware the resident did not return as expected and did not communicate this to the subsequent shifts on 07/14/26 and 07/15/26, who failed to initiate the Code Purple. […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Aug 1, 2025

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide protective oversight for one resident, (Resident #1), when the facility failed to follow their weather advisory procedures regarding going outdoors in extreme heat. The failure put this resident, who was prescribed two medications that could affect the body's ability to regulate temperature, at an increased safety risk due to the extreme heat. The resident was outside of the facility, without supervision, from 9:00 A.M. until approximately 4:00 P.M., during a heat advisory. The resident reported to facility administration that after purchasing cigarettes, he/she became overheated and lost consciousness in someone's backyard for an unknown length of time. The resident was admitted to the hospital on [DATE] at 4:28 P.M. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF692May 21, 2026

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to identify and address nutritional needs and swallowing difficulties for one resident who was at risk for impaired nutrition and hydration. The resident experienced a significant weight loss of 20.52 % in three months (Resident # 2). The sample size was 20. The census was 97.Review of the facility's Nutritional Management policy, last revised on 5/18/24, showed:-Purpose: The facility provides care and services to each resident to ensure the resident maintains acceptable parameters of nutritional status in the context of his or her overall condition;-Definitions: Acceptable parameter of nutritional status is inadequate, relative to his/her overall condition and prognosis, such as weight, food and fluid intake, and… […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF740May 21, 2026

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to identify, assess, monitor, and address behavioral health needs related to substance use disorder for residents with known history of substance abuse, including a thorough review of the referral information identifying recent substance use and positive toxicology results. The facility also failed to implement appropriate behavioral health interventions, monitoring, and services during a period in which social services staff were unavailable, resulting in missed opportunities to identify relapse risk, escalating warning signs, and ongoing substance use within the facility (Residents #104, #105, and #101). The resident sample was 20. The census was 97. The administrator was notified on [DATE], of the past non-compliance. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF684Oct 21, 2024

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident (Resident #10) kept all appointments with the orthopedic surgeon after an unwitnessed fall resulting in a fracture of his/her right arm on 9/13/24. Delay of treatment has caused pain and a decrease in his/her ability to perform activities of daily living (ADLs). The sample was three. The census was 77. Review of the facility's Resident Appointment policy, updated on 8/24, showed: -Purpose: To ensure all appointments and follow-up appointments (as needed) are scheduled. Residents will be taken to all scheduled appointments (barring emergency circumstances that require rescheduling). […]

Read 29 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 29 of 152 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jul 20, 2026Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • May 21, 2026Standard and complaint12 findings · 2 harm
  • Sep 22, 2025Complaint4 findings
  • Aug 1, 2025Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Jul 3, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 3, 2025Complaint2 findings
  • Dec 30, 2024Complaint4 findings · 2 harm
  • Nov 27, 2024Complaint1 finding
Show the 16 earlier surveys
  • Oct 21, 2024Complaint12 findings · 4 harm
  • Jun 27, 2024Standard10 findings · 1 harm
  • Nov 4, 2022Standard15 findings
  • Sep 17, 2019Standard6 findings
  • Oct 17, 2018Standard14 findings
  • Dec 22, 2017Standard5 findings
  • Dec 2, 2016Standard9 findings
  • Oct 8, 2015Standard and complaint12 findings · 2 harm
  • Nov 21, 2014Standard3 findings
  • Dec 19, 2013—8 findings
  • Oct 31, 2012—9 findings
  • Apr 20, 2012—8 findings
  • Oct 18, 2011—9 findings
  • Aug 5, 2011—1 finding · 1 harm
  • Feb 9, 2011—1 finding
  • Dec 9, 2010—4 findings · 1 harm

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction