Deficiency Index

Caritas Center, Inc

Wichita, Kansas · CCN 175534

5 surveys since 2017, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
13
Surveys
5
Harm or worse
0
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2017–2026
’17’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worseNone

No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file3/5

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
22
Ownership
Non profit - Corporation
Chain
Independent
County
Sedgwick
Medicare-certified since
2013

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
5
Staffing
5
Quality measures
3

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=10, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Mar 4, 2026

250 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day6.114.29
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.81—
Annual nurse turnover14.3%43.9%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD583.3%E—F116.7%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 6 of the 13 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Caritas Center, Inc, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Apr 24, 2024

    The facility reported a census of 18 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to prepare and serve food under sanitary conditions, to the residents of the facility appropriately to prevent the potential for food borne bacteria. Findings included: - During an initial tour of the resident kitchenette, on 04/23/24 at 08:29 AM, the following areas of concern were noted in the kitchenette area of healthcare: 1. The top of the microwave had a layer of dust. 2. The inside of the microwave had a heavy build-up of dried-on food. 3. One beige, plastic, rolling two-tier cart had three large, melted areas on the top tier, making it an unsanitizable surface. 4. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF641Mar 4, 2026

    The facility identified a census of 18 residents. The sample included eight residents with eight reviewed for Minimum Data Set (MDS) accuracy. Based on interview, observation, and record review the facility failed to complete an accurate MDS assessment regarding Resident (R) 7's medications.Findings included:- R7's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnosis tab documented diagnoses of dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion) and anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear).The Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated intact cognition. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF684Apr 24, 2024

    The facility reported a census of 18 residents with six selected for review for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff administered an accurate dose of a topical (the surface area) pain medication for one Resident (R)8, of the six residents reviewed. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R)8's electronic medical record, revealed diagnoses that included osteoarthritis (degenerative changes to one or many joints characterized by swelling and pain) of both knees and after care of bilateral knee joint replacement. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF758Apr 24, 2024

    The facility reported a census of 18 residents with six residents selected for review for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure as needed antianxiety medication did not exceed the 14-day reevaluation limit for one resident (R)18 of the six residents reviewed. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R)18's electronic medical record revealed diagnoses that included end stage renal disease, chronic pain, and osteoarthritis (degenerative changes to one or many joints characterized by swelling and pain) The Admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], assessed the resident with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 which indicated normal cognitive status. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF880Apr 24, 2024

    The facility reported a census of 18 residents. Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure housekeeping staff maintained proper isolation standards for transmission-based precautions. Findings included: - Interview, on 04/22/24 at 08:00 AM, with Administrative Nurse D, revealed four residents (R)5, R 6, R 9, and R 18 were on transmission-based precautions due to Covid infections. Observation, on 04/23/24 at 08:35 AM, revealed the housekeeping cart inside Resident (R)5's room Housekeeping Staff U and V were in Resident (R)5's room without gowns on. Housekeeping staff U stated the resident was not in the room at that time and they would spray the cart with a sanitizer upon exiting the room. […]

Read all 13 findings in full →

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Mar 4, 2026Standard1 finding
  • Apr 24, 2024Standard5 findings
  • Apr 22, 2021Standard4 findings
  • Sep 24, 2019Standard1 finding
  • Jan 26, 2017Standard2 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction