Deficiency Index

Bethel Health Care Center

North Newton, Kansas · CCN 175402

12 surveys since 2010. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2014.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
31
Surveys
12
Harm or worse
3
Immediate jeopardy
1
The record, 2010–2024
’10’15’20’24
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy1

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file10/12

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
65
Ownership
Non profit - Corporation
Chain
Independent
County
Harvey
Medicare-certified since
1997

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
5
Staffing
5
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=5, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Dec 18, 2024

691 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.914.29
Registered-nurse hours per resident day1.04—
Annual nurse turnover31.3%43.9%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD360.0%E—F240.0%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 5 of the 31 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Bethel Health Care Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Dec 18, 2024

    The facility had a census of 57 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store food in a safe, sanitary manner to prevent contamination or spoilage in the main food preparation kitchen and the storage building with the walk-in refrigeration units. This placed the 57 residents of the facility at risk for food-borne illness. Findings included: - On 12/16/24 at 08:52 AM, observation of the facility's walk-in refrigerator revealed a crate of grapes on the floor and the walk-in freezer had an opened box with two pies, two boxes of chicken breasts, and a large flat box of strawberries, all on the floor. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF838Dec 18, 2024

    The facility identified a census of 57 residents. The sample included 15 residents. Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to conduct a thorough facility-wide assessment to determine the resources necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations and non-routine situations that impact staffing and resident care. This failure placed all 57 residents residing in the facility at risk for impaired care. Findings Included: - An inspection of the Facility Assessment 2024 dated July 2024 provided by the facility on 12/16/24 revealed the following: The assessment identified the faciliy had 65 dually certified beds, with an average census of 57. The assessment included a staff compentnenceis tab which listed the skill sets for all depratments. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF550Jan 23, 2023

    The facility had a census of 58 residents. The sample included 16 residents with, one reviewed for dignity. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to promote care in a manner to maintain and enhance dignity and respect for one sampled resident, Resident (R) 38, who required assistance with meals. This placed the resident at risk for impaired dignity and decreased psychosocial well-being. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R38 recorded diagnoses of dementia without behavioral disturbance (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear), hypertension (high blood pressure), and weakness (the state or… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF677Jan 23, 2023

    The facility had a census of 58 residents. The sample included 16 residents, with five reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL). Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide one sampled resident, Resident (R) 38 with the necessary level of assistance for eating. This placed the resident at risk for weight loss. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R38 recorded diagnoses of dementia without behavioral disturbance (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear), hypertension (high blood pressure), and weakness (the state or condition of lacking strength). […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF758Jan 23, 2023

    The facility had a census of 58 residents. The sample included 16 residents, with five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure an appropriate indication for Resident (R) 47's antipsychotic (a medication used to treat any major mental disorder characterized by a gross impairment in reality testing) medication, Seroquel. This placed the resident at risk for adverse side effects related to antipsychotic use. […]

Read 21 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 21 of 31 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Dec 18, 2024Standard2 findings
  • Jan 23, 2023Standard and complaint3 findings
  • Jun 24, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Sep 9, 2019Standard6 findings
  • Jun 14, 2018Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Aug 3, 2017Standard and complaint6 findings · 1 harm
  • Dec 16, 2015Standard1 finding
  • Sep 12, 2014Standard and complaint2 findings
Show the 4 earlier surveys
  • Jul 30, 2014Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • May 23, 2013—4 findings
  • Feb 2, 2012—3 findings
  • Oct 20, 2010—1 finding

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction