Carillon Inc
Lubbock, Texas · CCN 675997
20 surveys since 2010. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2024.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 75
- Surveys
- 20
- Harm or worse
- 1
- Immediate jeopardy
- 1
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 100
- Ownership
- Non profit - Corporation
- Chain
- LIFE CARE SERVICES
- County
- Lubbock
- Medicare-certified since
- 2003
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 3
- Health inspection
- 3
- Staffing
- 3
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 34 not-for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in Texas.
Last survey on record
Jun 17, 2026
145 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.66 | 3.21 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.49 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 65.8% | 44.7% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $57,321 across 1 penalty
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K15.3% | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1157.9% | E736.8% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F5852×
Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
- F6562×
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
- F8122×
Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
- F8802×
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
- F5781×
Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Carillon Inc, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, patternF697Jan 27, 2024
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that pain management was provided to residents who require such services, consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for pain management. The facility failed to assess, reassess, and/or take steps to manage Resident #1's pain when she presented with symptoms of pain. On 01/26/24 at 04:14 PM an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified. While the IJ was removed on 01/27/24 at 4:48 PM, the facility remained out of compliance at a severity level of no actual harm and a scope of pattern due to the facility continuing to monitor the implementation and effectiveness of their Plan of Removal. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF585Jun 17, 2026
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to make information on how to file a grievance or complaint available to the residents for 10 of 10 confidential residents reviewed for grievances. The facility failed to ensure 10 of 10 residents were provided, through postings in prominent locations, the Grievance Procedure, were provided information who the facility grievance official was, their contact information, how to file an anonymous grievance, and their right to obtain a written decision related to their grievance. This failure could place residents at risk of unresolved grievances and decreased quality of life. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Jun 17, 2026
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in facility 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for food safety. 1) The facility failed to ensure food items in the refrigerator (x1), and freezer (x1), were labeled and stored in accordance with the professional standards for food service. 2) The facility failed to ensure the garbage can used for food waste was covered unless in use. 3) The DC failed to wear a hair restraint to cover his mustache. These failures could place residents at risk for food-borne illness and cross contamination.The findings included: During kitchen tour observations on 06/15/2026 that began at 9:32 a.m. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF814Jun 17, 2026
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to dispose of garbage and refuse properly for 2 of 3 dumpsters (dumpsters #1 and #2), in that: -The doors for dumpsters #1 and #2 were left open.-Garbage was left outside of the dumpster. These failures could place residents at risk of exposure to germs and diseases carried by vermin and rodents.The findings included: Observation on 06/15/2026 at 10:01 a.m., revealed the facility's dumpster area, which was in the docking area behind the kitchen had commercial-size dumpsters (#1 and #2), with open doors. Further observations revealed improperly trashed iron bars (x5) and black trash bags (x2) on the ground behind both dumpsters (#1 and #2). […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF880Jun 17, 2026
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to provide a safe, comfortable, and sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of diseases for 3 of 3 residents (Residents #3, #66 and #85) and 2 of 2 (RN A and RN B) staff reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to use EBP during wound care for 3 Residents (Residents #3, #66 and #85). This failure could place residents at risk for spread of infection and cross contamination. Findings include: Resident #3 Record review of Resident #3's clinical record revealed a face sheet, dated 06/17/2026, which indicated the resident was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. […]
Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 75 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jun 17, 2026Standard7 findings
- Apr 25, 2025Standard and complaint3 findings
- Feb 28, 2025Complaint2 findings
- Oct 25, 2024Complaint2 findings
- Mar 21, 2024Standard2 findings
- Jan 27, 2024Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
- May 9, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Feb 9, 2023Standard6 findings
Show the 12 earlier surveys
- Mar 31, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Nov 17, 2021Standard1 finding
- Oct 4, 2019Standard1 finding
- Oct 26, 2018Standard7 findings
- Jan 11, 2018Standard13 findings
- Dec 22, 2016Standard2 findings
- Jan 27, 2016Standard1 finding
- Nov 6, 2014Standard7 findings
- Jan 9, 2014—3 findings
- Jan 23, 2013—5 findings
- Jan 27, 2012—2 findings
- Dec 2, 2010—6 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction