Town Hall Estates Keene Inc
Keene, Texas · CCN 676047
17 surveys since 2012, 4 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 42
- Surveys
- 17
- Harm or worse
- 4
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 126
- Ownership
- Non profit - Corporation
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Johnson
- Medicare-certified since
- 2005
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 3
- Health inspection
- 4
- Staffing
- 1
- Quality measures
- 3
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 34 not-for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in Texas.
Last survey on record
Jul 31, 2025
466 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.18 | 3.21 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.21 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 45.6% | 44.7% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $16,209 across 2 penalties
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G28.7% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1147.8% | E1043.5% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F5503×
Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
- F8123×
Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
- F5582×
Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
- F8802×
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
- F5651×
Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Town Hall Estates Keene Inc, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF760Jul 9, 2025
Based on the interviews and record review the facility failed ensure residents were free of any significant medication errors for 1 (Resident # 1) of 6 reviewed for significant medication errors. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 received his prescribed medications. According to residents' #1 MAR the missed medications are: clopidogrel prescribed for atrial fibrillation, flomax prescribed for prostate, flonase prescribed for allergies, isosorbide mononitrate prescribed for angina, nifedipine for hypertension, levothyroxine for thyroid, pantoprazole for peptic ulcer, furosemide for edema, lubiprostone for constipation, metoprolol for hypertension, sucralfate for peptic ulcer, and ranolazine for myocardial infarction/chest pain. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Oct 20, 2023
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the resident environment remained free of accident hazards for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for quality of care in that: CNA A failed to operate the Hoyer lift with 2 staff per facility policy when transferring Resident #1 from the chair to the bed. Resident #1 sustained a fracture of the right lower tibia / fibia. This failure could place residents at risk of harm or injury and contribute to avoidable accidents. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 4/30/2022 indicated Resident #1, was a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE]. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Mar 25, 2023
Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure Resident # 1 received adequate supervision and assistance to prevent a fall for 1 ( Resident #1) of 5 residents reviewed for falls. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 remained free of falls to prevent an accident. These failures could place residents at risk for falls with possible injuries due to lack of supervision. Findings Include: Review of Resident #1's undated face sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old female was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnoses of Traumatic brain injury(caused by an outside force, usually a violent blow to the head), dementia(memory loss), Type 2 diabetes, fracture of the occiput(traumatic injuries that involve articulation between the base of the skill and the cervical spine,… […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF565Jul 31, 2025
Number of residents sampled: Number of residents cited: Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to consider the views of the resident or family group and act promptly upon the grievances and recommendations of such groups concerning issues of resident care and life in the facility or to demonstrate their response and rationale for such response for 1 of 1 Resident Council reviewed. The facility failed to follow up on concerns and requests expressed in Resident Council meetings for the months of April 2025 and June 2025. The facility failed to ensure Resident Council #1's concerns regarding the delay of call lights and resident care was being provided in a reasonable time during the evening and overnight shifts. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF692Jul 31, 2025
Number of residents sampled: Number of residents cited: Based on interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status, such as usual body weight or desirable body weight range unless the resident clinical condition demonstrated that this was not possible or resident preferences indicated otherwise for one (Resident #12) of one resident reviewed for nutrition status maintenance.The facility failed to ensure a weight variance was addressed and documented to ensure management of weight loss for Resident #12. […]
Read 22 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 22 of 42 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Aug 4, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Jul 31, 2025Standard6 findings
- Jul 9, 2025Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Mar 19, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Feb 24, 2025Complaint2 findings
- Feb 5, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Jan 16, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Jun 6, 2024Standard4 findings
Show the 9 earlier surveys
- Oct 20, 2023Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Jun 2, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Apr 27, 2023Standard and complaint6 findings
- Mar 25, 2023Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
- Feb 18, 2022Standard and complaint6 findings
- Jul 12, 2019Standard3 findings
- Jul 17, 2014Standard1 finding
- Jun 4, 2013—1 finding · 1 harm
- Jul 13, 2012—4 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction