CareOne At Teaneck
Teaneck, New Jersey · CCN 315502
18 surveys since 2011, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 73
- Surveys
- 18
- Harm or worse
- 0
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 128
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- CAREONE
- County
- Bergen
- Medicare-certified since
- 2007
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 4
- Health inspection
- 3
- Staffing
- 3
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded fewer weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 168 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in New Jersey.
Last survey on record
Jul 31, 2025
466 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.52 | 3.47 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.92 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 29.5% | 41.8% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1684.2% | E210.5% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C15.3% |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6582×
Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
- F6862×
Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
- F8422×
Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
- F5611×
Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
- F6021×
Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at CareOne At Teaneck, in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF692Jul 31, 2025
Based on record review, observation, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure initial and weekly weights were implemented for two out three residents (Resident (R) 26 and R92). This lack of monitoring of residents' weight loss/gain can delay in identifying potential nutritional problems.Findings include: Review of a facility policy titled, Weight Assessment and Intervention dated 03/22 indicated .Residents are weighed upon admission and at intervals established by the interdisciplinary team such as: weekly for four weeks, the monthly unless otherwise indicated. The threshold for significant unplanned and undesired weight loss is based on the following criteria.1 month-5 percent weight loss is significant.6 months-10 percent weight loss is significant. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF658Feb 29, 2024
Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain professional standards of nursing practice for not following physician orders for 3 of 21 residents reviewed (Resident # 19, #197, and #72) and b.) failed to document for accountability of medications and treatments administered for 3 of 21 residents reviewed (Resident #72, #196, and #197). The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45, Chapter 11. Nursing Board. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF880May 23, 2022
C #: NJ 7, Covid-19 Infection Control Based on interviews and review of pertinent facility documentation on 5/23/22, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that all staff and visitors entering the building were screened for Covid-19 signs and symptoms in accordance with the facility policy COVID-19 . and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines for 3 of 10 employees and 6 of 10 visitors, reviewed for Covid-19 screening. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) COVID-19, Interim Infection Prevention and Control Recommendations for Healthcare Personnel During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic, updated 2/2/22, showed .1. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF580Aug 21, 2026
Based on interviews, review of medical records, and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the resident's physician (RP) timely of a change in condition for 1 of 3 residents (Resident # 3) reviewed. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45, Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a licensed practical nurse is defined as performing tasks and responsibilities within the framework of case finding; reinforcing the patient and family teaching program through health teaching, health counseling and provision of supportive and restorative care, under the direction of a registered nurse or licensed or… […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF760Aug 21, 2026
Complaint #: 3017917 Based on interviews and records review on 08/20/2026 and 08/21/2026, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident (Resident #5) was free from a significant medication error on 05/11/2026, when ear drops were administered into the resident's eyes. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #5) reviewed for medication administration and was evidenced by the following:According to the admission Record (AR), Resident #5 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included but were not limited to displaced intertrochanteric fracture of left femur, subsequent encounter for closed fracture with routine healing (break in the upper part of the thigh bone); need for assistance with personal care; and type 2 diabetes… […]
Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 73 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Aug 21, 2026Complaint4 findings
- Jul 31, 2025Standard and complaint13 findings
- Feb 29, 2024Standard3 findings
- May 23, 2022Infection control1 finding
- Nov 22, 2021Standard3 findings
- Jan 15, 2020Standard3 findings
- Mar 7, 2019Standard4 findings
- Nov 30, 2017Complaint2 findings
Show the 10 earlier surveys
- Mar 13, 2017Standard3 findings
- Feb 16, 2016Standard9 findings
- Apr 21, 2015Standard4 findings
- Apr 28, 2014Standard2 findings
- Feb 20, 2014Complaint2 findings
- Jun 5, 2013—5 findings
- May 23, 2012—6 findings
- May 8, 2012—2 findings
- Aug 25, 2011—1 finding
- Jun 13, 2011—6 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction