CareOne at New Milford
New Milford, New Jersey · CCN 315306
18 surveys since 2011, 2 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 98
- Surveys
- 18
- Harm or worse
- 2
- Immediate jeopardyall corrected before survey
- 1
Findings at the most serious level CMS records. All were recorded as past non-compliance — corrected before the survey.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 236
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- CAREONE
- County
- Bergen
- Medicare-certified since
- 1991
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 3
- Health inspection
- 2
- Staffing
- 3
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 168 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in New Jersey.
Last survey on record
Jul 1, 2026
131 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 2.76 | 3.47 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.55 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 13.1% | 41.8% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $15,334 across 1 penalty
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J13.1% | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D2887.5% | E39.4% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6583×
Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
- F6092×
Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
- F6892×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
- F7552×
Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
- F8802×
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at CareOne at New Milford, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Mar 6, 2025
Complaint # NJ: #166361; #173486 Based on interview, record review, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to adequately assess a cognitively impaired resident, with a history of elopement as an elopement risk, and implement interventions to prevent the resident from exiting a secured unit, subsequently the facility, which resulted in the resident eloping on 7/29/23. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for elopement (Resident #123). On 7/29/23, Resident #123 who was cognitively impaired and ambulated independently with a history of elopement, eloped from the facility and was last seen by staff at 5:30 PM, in the television (TV) room. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF658Jan 18, 2023
Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to: a) follow a physician's order with regards to the use of an assistive device for one of three residents, Resident #5 reviewed for the limited range of motion (ROM); b) utilized the Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk (a standardized, evidence-based assessment tool commonly used in health care to assess and document a patient's risk for developing pressure ) for two of four residents, Residents #15 and #83 reviewed for pressure ulcers; c) follow a physician's recommendation and discontinuing a wound treatment for a healed wound in a timely manner for one of four residents (Resident#136) reviewed for wounds. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF730Jan 18, 2023
Based on observation, interview and review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the Certified Nursing Aide (CNA) received performance review for four of five CNA files reviewed. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 01/12/23 at 12:50 PM, the surveyor requested from the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) the education, competencies and performance reviews for five CNA's. On 01/13/23, the facility provided the education and competencies for four of the five CNA's. The facility indicated that one of the five CNAs had resigned. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF755Jan 18, 2023
Based on observation, interview, and review of the facility provided documents, it was determined that the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services in accordance with professional standards to ensure a) expired narcotic medications were removed from active inventory b) dispensed and received medication from the pharmacy were reconciled for accuracy which resulted in the wrong dosage stocked in the active inventory c) expired biological from 6/22 were removed from active inventory This deficient practice was identified for one of one of the electronic emergency (backup) machine [name redacted] observed and was evidenced as follows: 1. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF725Jul 1, 2026
Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of other pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to provide sufficient nursing staff to ensure staff signed the resident's medical records as medications and treatments provided for 1 of 35 residents (Resident #47). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 6/24/26 at 9:50 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #47 lying in bed with enteral feeding in place. On 6/25/26 at 9:15 AM, the surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #47. […]
Read 21 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 21 of 98 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jul 1, 2026Complaint1 finding
- May 15, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Mar 6, 2025Standard and complaint16 findings · 1 harm
- Jan 26, 2024Complaint2 findings
- Jan 18, 2023Standard10 findings
- Jan 26, 2021Standard2 findings
- Oct 7, 2019Standard9 findings
- Sep 6, 2018Standard5 findings
Show the 10 earlier surveys
- Dec 28, 2017Complaint1 finding
- Jun 5, 2017Standard3 findings
- Nov 22, 2016Complaint1 finding
- May 19, 2016Standard18 findings
- May 5, 2015Standard4 findings
- May 19, 2014Standard6 findings
- Jun 26, 2013—9 findings
- Feb 8, 2013—3 findings · 1 harm
- May 4, 2012—2 findings
- May 23, 2011—5 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
- Phoenix Center for Rehabilitation and PediatricsHaskell1 harm finding
- Excel Care at the PinesAtlantic Cityno harm findings
- Berlin Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterBerlin3 harm findings
- Advanced Subacute Rehabilitation Center at SewellSewell1 harm finding
- Alaris Health at The ChateauRochelle Parkno harm findings
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction