Deficiency Index

Capstone Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing

Amsterdam, New York · CCN 335543

24 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2024.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
84
Surveys
24
Harm or worse
1
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse1

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file18/24

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
120
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
UPSTATE SERVICES GROUP
County
Montgomery · rural
Medicare-certified since
1976

CMS ratings

Overall
1
Health inspection
1
Staffing
3
Quality measures
3

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 79 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in New York.

Last survey on record

Jun 26, 2026

136 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.173.37
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.49—
Annual nurse turnover52.5%47.0%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$47,879 across 1 penalty

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG13.1%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD2165.6%E1031.3%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 32 of the 84 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F5503×

    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.

  • F5842×

    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.

  • F6792×

    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.

  • F6842×

    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

  • F7252×

    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Capstone Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF580Dec 10, 2024

    Based on record review and interview during a recertification survey, the facility did not immediately consult with and or notify resident's physician of a significant change in the resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial status for 1 (Resident #115) of 2 residents reviewed. Specially, Resident #115 had a history of chronic respiratory failure, had increased congestion and cough. Resident's health care proxy expressed concern to Registered Nurse #4. Registered Nurse #4 assessed Resident #115 and was noted with altered mental status, decrease in oxygen saturation from 98% to 94%, and abnormal lung sounds. There was no documented evidence that the physician was notified of the change in condition including change in mental status and respiratory distress. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF550Dec 10, 2024

    Based on observation, record review and interviews during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure each resident was treated with respect and dignity and cared for in a manner that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life for 6 (Resident #'s 2, 12, 28, 44, 97, and 114) of 35 residents reviewed. Specifically, (a.) Resident #'s 2, 12, 28, and 114 were provided plastic flatware with their meals instead of silver flatware. (b.) Residents #44 and #97 were not talked to in a dignified manner by staff providing care. This is evidenced by: A facility policy Dignity and Quality of Life Policy, not dated, documented that each resident shall be cared for in a manner that promoted and enhanced quality of life, dignity, respect, and individuality. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF584Dec 10, 2024

    Based on observation and interviews conducted during the recertification survey, the facility did not provide effective housekeeping and maintenance services on 1 of 3 resident units and the building exterior. Specifically, the exterior of the building and walls were not clean. This is evidenced by: During observation on 12/03/2024 at 11:17 AM, the walls beneath the hand sanitizer dispensers attached to the walls outside room #s 366, 374, 337, 387, and by the elevator on unit 3 had multiple streak stains around the dispenser that descended to the baseboard. During observations on 12/04/2024 at 5:29 PM, the walls beneath the hand sanitizer dispensers attached to the walls outside room #s 237, 266, 274, 279, and 287 had multiple streak stains that descended to the baseboard. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF697Dec 10, 2024

    Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure pain management was provided to each resident in accordance with professional standards of care for 3 (Resident #'s 22, 25, and 317) of 4 residents reviewed for pain management. Specifically over a two-month period, the facility did not evaluate their existing pain and the cause(s), and managing or preventing pain, consistent with the comprehensive assessment and plan of care, current professional standards of practice, and the resident's goals and preferences. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF725Dec 10, 2024

    Based on observation, record review, and interviews during an abbreviated survey (NY00353512), the facility did not ensure the provision of sufficient nursing staff to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident throughout the facility. Specifically, the facility's staffing minimum staffing levels were not met each day from 12/02/2024 through 12/10/2024 per facility assessment. This is evidenced by: Upon entrance to the facility on [DATE] there were 118 residents residing on 3 units. The Facility assessment dated 2024 and based on a resident population profile from 7/23/2023 to 7/23/2024 documented, the facility's staffing plan for direct residential care. […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 84 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jun 26, 2026Complaint2 findings
  • Dec 10, 2024Standard and complaint16 findings · 1 harm
  • May 28, 2024Complaint3 findings
  • Mar 1, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 21, 2022Standard8 findings
  • Feb 24, 2021Infection control1 finding
  • Dec 29, 2020Infection control2 findings
  • Jul 10, 2020Complaint1 finding
Show the 16 earlier surveys
  • Dec 23, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 22, 2019Standard3 findings
  • Jul 13, 2018Standard7 findings
  • Dec 20, 2016Standard9 findings
  • Oct 9, 2015Standard and complaint6 findings
  • Mar 5, 2015Complaint2 findings
  • Sep 29, 2014Standard and complaint4 findings
  • Jul 18, 2014Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 24, 2014—1 finding
  • Sep 10, 2013—1 finding
  • Aug 15, 2013—3 findings
  • Nov 19, 2012—5 findings
  • Sep 17, 2012—1 finding
  • Jan 30, 2012—1 finding
  • Oct 12, 2011—4 findings
  • May 27, 2011—1 finding

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction