Deficiency Index

Caprice Health Care Center

North Lima, Ohio · CCN 366062

18 surveys since 2010, 3 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
66
Surveys
18
Harm or worse
3
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2010–2026
’10’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse3

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file15/18

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
75
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
Independent
County
Mahoning
Medicare-certified since
1996

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
5
Staffing
4
Quality measures
3

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=5, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Mar 10, 2026

244 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.523.47
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.81—
Annual nurse turnover33.3%49.2%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD5100.0%E—F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 5 of the 66 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Caprice Health Care Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF558Mar 10, 2026

    Based on observations, medical record reviews, resident interviews, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure call lights were within reach of residents. This affected two residents (#11 and #12) of seven residents reviewed for call lights. The facility census was 69.Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #11 revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease, spinal stenosis of the lumbar region with neurogenic claudication, and discitis.Review of the Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #11 had moderate cognitive impairment. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF550Apr 24, 2025

    Based on record review, staff interview, and observations, the facility failed to ensure all residents were treated in a dignified manner. This affected four (Resident #40, Resident #6, Resident #22, Resident #34) of 29 residents that required a mechanical lift for transfers. The facility census was 64. Findings include: Review of Resident #40's clinical record revealed an admitted [DATE] with diagnoses including vascular dementia, hemiplegia, neurogenic bladder, chronic respiratory failure, and calorie malnutrition. Review of the Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #40 required a mechanical lift for transfers. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF695Apr 24, 2025

    Based on observations, interviews, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure respiratory equipment was dated to make certain it was changed at appropriate intervals to decrease the risk of acquired pneumonia or infection. This affected three residents (#26, #27, #127) of six residents reviewed for respiratory care. The facility census was 64. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #26 revealed an admitted [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure, dependence on respirator (breathing machine), tracheostomy, quadriplegia, and gastrostomy (feeding tube). Review of Resident #26's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed severely impaired cognition and altered level of consciousness. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF842Apr 24, 2025

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the accuracy of medical records. This affected one of 32 residents whose records were reviewed, Resident #40. Facility census was 64. Findings include: Review of Resident #40's clinical record revealed an admitted [DATE] with diagnoses including vascular dementia, hemiplegia, neurogenic bladder, chronic respiratory failure, and calorie malnutrition. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #40 did not have any unhealed pressure ulcers or injuries. Review of the Nurses Skin/ Wound notes dated 04/10/25 timed 10:05 A.M. revealed Resident #40 was at high risk for impaired skin integrity. Resident #40 required maximum to total assistance for bed mobility. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF604Oct 27, 2022

    Based observation, interview, record review, and policy review the facility failed to ensure monitoring and evaluation of bilateral wrist restraints was documented while used for Resident #28. This affected one resident (Resident #28) of two residents reviewed for abuse, neglect, and exploitation. The facility reported one resident (Resident #28) who had physical restraints. The facility census was 66. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #28 revealed an admitted [DATE]. diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 09/14/22, revealed Resident #28 had severely impaired cognition. […]

Read 22 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 22 of 66 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Mar 10, 2026Standard1 finding
  • Apr 24, 2025Standard3 findings
  • Oct 27, 2022Standard1 finding
  • Jul 29, 2020Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Oct 17, 2019Standard1 finding
  • Sep 24, 2018Standard8 findings
  • Jul 27, 2017Standard4 findings
  • Jun 8, 2017Complaint1 finding
Show the 10 earlier surveys
  • Mar 27, 2017Complaint2 findings
  • Sep 8, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • May 6, 2016Standard3 findings
  • Feb 19, 2015Standard2 findings
  • Apr 29, 2014Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Nov 21, 2013—6 findings · 1 harm
  • Aug 24, 2012—12 findings
  • Jun 6, 2012—1 finding
  • Jul 7, 2011—7 findings
  • Sep 30, 2010—11 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction