Burton Health Care Center
Burton, Ohio · CCN 366092
9 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2018.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 50
- Surveys
- 9
- Harm or worse
- 2
- Immediate jeopardy
- 1
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 90
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- WINDSOR HOUSE, INC.
- County
- Geauga
- Medicare-certified since
- 1996
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 5
- Health inspection
- 5
- Staffing
- 4
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=4, floor 20).
Last survey on record
Sep 1, 2022
1,530 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.06 | 3.47 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.66 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 37.5% | 49.2% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D360.0% | E240.0% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Burton Health Care Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF610Sep 1, 2022
Based on record review, facility Self-Reported Incident review, facility policy and procedure review and interview the facility failed to ensure Temporary Nurse Aide (TNA) #369 was immediately removed from the facility once an allegation of resident abuse involving the TNA was made. This affected one resident (#222) and had the potential to affect 32 additional residents (#1, #7, #9, #10, #12, #13, #15, #18, #21, #30, #34, #30, #36, #40, #43, #44, #45, #47, #49, #51, #55, #56, #58, #59, #61, #62, #66, #67, #71, #231, #232 and #234) residing on the unit where TNA #369 worked. The facility census was 70. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #222 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for a respite stay and then transitioned to long term care placement on 08/24/22. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF580Sep 1, 2022
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the physician was notified when Resident #224 missed five doses of her muscle relaxant and for Resident #56's elevated blood sugars. This affected two residents (Resident #56 and #224) out of two residents reviewed for physician notification of change in condition. The facility census was 70. Findings included: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #56 revealed an admitted [DATE] and diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . Review of the care plan dated 02/07/22 revealed Resident #56 had diabetes. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF602Sep 1, 2022
Based on record review, facility Self-Reported Incident (SRI) review and interview the facility failed to prevent the misappropriation of medications for Resident #58 and Resident #122. This affected two residents (#58 and #122) of two residents reviewed for misappropriation of medication. The facility census was 70. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #58 revealed an admitted [DATE] with diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . Record review revealed Resident #58 had intact cognition. Review of the physician's orders [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . Review of the closed medical record for Resident #122 revealed an admitted [DATE]. Resident #122 expired on [DATE]. Resident #122 had diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF658Sep 1, 2022
Based on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered at the time they were prepared per professional standards. This affected two residents (Resident #16 and #17) of six Residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 70. Finding included: Review of Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #320's personnel file revealed a date of hire of 06/28/13. There was no education and/ or disciplinary action revealed in her file regarding the concern of preparing medications in advance or leaving medications in rooms unattended. 1. Review of medical record for Resident #17 revealed an admitted [DATE] and diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . […]
Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 50 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Sep 1, 2022Standard and complaint4 findings
- Sep 19, 2019Standard1 finding
- Aug 8, 2018Standard and complaint11 findings · 2 harm
- May 10, 2017Standard3 findings
- Mar 17, 2016Standard5 findings
- Jan 8, 2015Standard7 findings
- Sep 26, 2013—5 findings
- Jun 28, 2012—12 findings
Show the 1 earlier survey
- Apr 21, 2011—2 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction