Deficiency Index

Bronx Park Rehabilitation & Nursing Center

Bronx, New York · CCN 335358

10 surveys since 2010, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
22
Surveys
10
Harm or worse
0
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2010–2025
’10’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worseNone

No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file7/10

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
240
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
Independent
County
Bronx
Medicare-certified since
1972

CMS ratings

Overall
4
Health inspection
4
Staffing
2
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=7, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Dec 9, 2025

335 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.313.37
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.53—
Annual nurse turnover20.5%33.3%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD6100.0%E—F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 6 of the 22 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Bronx Park Rehabilitation & Nursing Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF760Dec 9, 2025

    Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the Abbreviated Survey (2624284), the facility failed to ensure that residents are free of significant medication error. This was evident for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 residents reviewed for medication administration. Specifically, Resident #1 was administered sixty (60) units of insulin when six (6) units was the physician ordered dose.The findings are:A Facility Reported Incident and Investigation dated 09/25/2025, documented that on 09/21/2025 at 7:14AM, Resident #1 was administered 60 units of insulin instead of 6 units of insulin. Licensed Practical Nurse #1 reported the medication error to Registered Nurse #1, the supervisor. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF582Sep 23, 2024

    Based on record review and interview conducted during the Recertification survey from 09/16/2024-09/23/2024, the facility did not ensure a resident, or their designated representative was provided appropriate notification at the termination of skilled services. Specifically, the facility did not provide the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage for Medicare Part A at least two calendar days before Medicare covered services ended as required, did not ensure that notices were mailed on the same day telephone notification was made, and did not provide the Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage form for residents who were remaining in the facility after discharge from skilled services. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF655Sep 23, 2024

    Based on record review and staff interviews conducted during the Recertification Survey from 09/16/2024 to 09/23/2024, the facility did not ensure that residents' and their representatives were provided with a summary of the baseline care plan. This was evident in 1 (Resident #76) of 3 reviewed for Urinary Catheter, 1 (Resident #92) of 1 resident reviewed for Pain, and 1 (Resident #220) of 2 residents reviewed for Behavioral/Emotional out of 38 total sampled residents. Specifically, residents or their representatives did not receive a copy of their baseline care plan. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF804Sep 23, 2024

    Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the Recertification Survey from 09/16/2024 to 09/23/2024, the facility did not ensure that food was served at an appetizing temperature during meal service. This was evident for 1 (Resident #203) of 3 residents reviewed for Food out of 38 total sampled residents. Specifically, food served during lunch meal service was not maintained at palatable and appetizing temperatures. The findings are: The facility's policy and procedure titled Hot Food Holding Policy dated October 2022, documented hot foods should be 135 degrees Fahrenheit or above at the time food is served to the residents. Resident #203 had diagnoses which included Diabetes Mellitus, Hypertension, and Heart Failure. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF880Sep 23, 2024

    Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during the Recertification Survey from 09/16/2024 to 09/23/2024, the facility did not ensure that infection control prevention practices and procedures were maintained to provide a safe and sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. This was evident for 2 (Resident #112 and Resident #181) of 3 residents reviewed for Skin Conditions (non-pressure) out of 38 sampled residents. Specifically, the Physician Assistant and Registered Nurse #5 failed to comply with infection control protocols during wound care. […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 22 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Dec 9, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 23, 2024Standard4 findings
  • Aug 8, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 21, 2022Standard1 finding
  • Sep 28, 2017Standard2 findings
  • Jul 8, 2016Standard3 findings
  • Mar 18, 2013—3 findings
  • Feb 10, 2012—2 findings
Show the 2 earlier surveys
  • Jan 30, 2012—1 finding
  • Dec 13, 2010—4 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction