Deficiency Index

Brittany Manor

Midland, Michigan · CCN 235245

35 surveys since 2010, 19 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
178
Surveys
35
Harm or worse
19
Immediate jeopardy
4
The record, 2010–2026
’10’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy4

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file26/35

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
138
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
CIENA HEALTHCARE/LAUREL HEALTH CARE
County
Midland
Medicare-certified since
1976

CMS ratings

Overall
3
Health inspection
2
Staffing
5
Quality measures
3

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 82 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in Michigan.

Last survey on record

May 13, 2026

180 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.063.69
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.92—
Annual nurse turnover45.9%43.0%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Abuse icon
Flagged by CMS on Care Compare

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG516.1%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD2064.5%E619.4%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 31 of the 178 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6844×

    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

  • F6583×

    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.

  • F5502×

    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.

  • F6892×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

  • F8422×

    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Brittany Manor, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF880May 18, 2022

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement appropriate infection control practices to prevent or mitigate the spread of COVID-19 by (1) Not donning and doffing Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) before/after entering COVID isolation rooms, (2) Not utilizing hand hygiene, (3) Failing to contain meal trays from COVID-19 isolations rooms, (4) Not containing lab test vials from a COVID-positive resident while transporting the specimen, (5) Failing to update COVID education and infection control training for staff, and (6) the timely notification of COVID- positive residents to the local health department during a COVID-19 outbreak in the facility that began on 05/03/2022, when the first staff member tested positive for COVID-19 and on 05/09/2022 when… […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF610Feb 11, 2021

    This citation pertains to intakes: MI 371, MI 416, MI 110, MI 319, MI 519, MI 751, MI 448, MI 801, and MI 375 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to investigate abuse for 2 Residents (R30 and R 33) of 15 Residents reviewed for abuse, resulting in 2 Residents (R30 and R33) having injuries of unknown origin and not investigated thoroughly to determine the causes of the injuries. This deficient practice resulted in an immediate jeopardy when R30 presented with suspicious deep purple bruising to the upper torso and facility staff failed to investigate and determine cause and again when staff failed to properly identify causes and investigate for R33's suspicious bruises to bottom and inner thigh. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF684Apr 15, 2026

    This citation pertains to intakes #: 2808141, 2749047, and 2977070Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to 1.) ensure comprehensive nursing assessments were completed and 2.) identify and notify the provider of a change in condition for 2 residents (Resident #7 and #8) out of 3 residents reviewed for quality of care resulting in a delay in treatment, the worsening of symptoms, and hospitalization.Findings:Resident #7 (R7)Review of an admission Record revealed R7 was an [AGE] year-old female, admitted to the facility on [DATE], with pertinent diagnoses which included: congestive heart failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF600Nov 6, 2025

    This citation pertains to intake # 2656241 and #2658212.Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical abuse by a staff person, for two of three residents (Resident #100 and Resident #101) reviewed for abuse, resulting in the need for emergency medical attention and admission to the hospital for R100. Findings: Resident #100 (R100)Review of an admission Record revealed R100 was an [AGE] year-old female, originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], with pertinent diagnosis of dementia. Review of R100's Plan of Care reflected that R100 was independent with walking, bed mobility, feeding herself with set-up assistance, and transferring between surfaces. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF684Jan 23, 2025

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to promptly identify a change in condition and act upon those changes for 1 resident (R4) out of 4 residents reviewed for quality of care, resulting in R4 experiencing unnecessary pain, a delay in evaluation and surgical intervention for a femur fracture. Findings: Resident #4 (R4) Review of an Admission Record revealed R4 was an [AGE] year-old male, admitted to the facility on [DATE], with pertinent diagnoses which included: difficulty in walking, muscle wasting and atrophy, need for assistance with personal care, weakness, history of falls prior to admission, and dementia. […]

Read 35 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 35 of 178 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • May 13, 2026Standard9 findings
  • Apr 15, 2026Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Nov 6, 2025Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Oct 8, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 27, 2025Standard4 findings
  • Jan 23, 2025Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
  • Apr 4, 2024Standard10 findings
  • Aug 25, 2023Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
Show the 27 earlier surveys
  • Jun 8, 2023Standard1 finding
  • Jun 13, 2022Standard7 findings
  • May 18, 2022Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Feb 11, 2021Complaint10 findings · 2 harm
  • Nov 22, 2019Standard25 findings
  • Jul 17, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 29, 2018Standard7 findings
  • May 22, 2018Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Mar 8, 2018Complaint4 findings
  • Sep 19, 2017Complaint3 findings
  • Aug 24, 2017Standard18 findings · 2 harm
  • Feb 2, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 31, 2016Standard11 findings
  • Jun 1, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • May 3, 2016Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Jul 31, 2015Standard10 findings
  • May 13, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 14, 2014Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Aug 29, 2014Standard7 findings
  • Oct 31, 2013—11 findings
  • Dec 7, 2012—7 findings · 1 harm
  • Nov 4, 2011—5 findings
  • Aug 29, 2011—1 finding · 1 harm
  • Jan 20, 2011—3 findings · 1 harm
  • Jan 6, 2011—4 findings · 1 harm
  • Oct 28, 2010—4 findings · 2 harm
  • Sep 24, 2010—1 finding

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction