Deficiency Index

Bradley Estates Nursing and Rehab LLC

Milwaukee, Wisconsin · CCN 525325

60 surveys since 2010, 42 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
431
Surveys
60
Harm or worse
42
Immediate jeopardy
12
The record, 2010–2026
’10’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy12

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file44/60

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
198
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
SHLOMO HOFFMAN
County
Milwaukee
Medicare-certified since
1983

CMS ratings

Overall
1
Health inspection
1
Staffing
2
Quality measures
2

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 15 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in Wisconsin.

Last survey on record

Jul 9, 2026

123 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.833.71
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.67—
Annual nurse turnover70.1%58.8%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$305,374 across 4 penalties
Payment denials
3
Special focus
SFF Candidate
Abuse icon
Flagged by CMS on Care Compare

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ21.3%K10.6%L—
Actual harmG117.1%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD9661.5%E3723.7%F95.8%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 156 of the 431 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6898×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

  • F8808×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

  • F6107×

    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.

  • F6777×

    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.

  • F5855×

    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Bradley Estates Nursing and Rehab LLC, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, patternF689Feb 6, 2025

    Based on staff and resident interview and record review, the facility did not ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible for 1 resident (R) (R3) of 1 resident (with the potential to affect 26 of 141 other residents) when R3 obtained a loaded firearm from a staff's bag and carried it onto a secured memory care unit and for 1 (R2) of 1 resident who incurred a third degree cryogenic burn from a portable oxygen tank that was placed on the foot pedals of the resident's wheelchair. R3 was on 1:1 supervision related to wandering and aggressive behavior toward staff. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)-C was assigned to complete 1:1 supervision for R3 on the 1/22/25 PM shift. […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, patternF600Jan 12, 2021

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure 2 of 10 residents residing on the 200 unit were free from sexual abuse. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 10 out of 10 female residents on the 200 unit. On 9/17/20, R14 entered R13's room exposing his penis while approaching R13 saying sexually inappropriate comments. Staff did not immediately report this incident of abuse and did not immediately protect additional residents from potential further abuse that night. After facility staff developed interventions on 9/18/20, the facility failed to follow through with one on one (1:1) supervision for R14, failed to assess the effectiveness of interventions and failed to ensure frequent checks were done for R14. […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF745Jul 1, 2024

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility did not comprehensively provide medically related social services, to attain the highest psychosocial well-being, of a resident for 1 (R124) of 30 residents reviewed. *R124 verbalized, and attempted, to leave the facility to go home. The facility did not look at whether R124 still needed activation of power of attorney for health care and could, thus make own health decisions, did not look at alternatives to Sertraline, an antidepressant that R124 refused to take, did not look at discharge alternatives, and did not develop a plan of care for supervising R124 when agitated and expressing a desire to leave. […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Jan 17, 2024

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that each resident receives adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 2 (R1 and R4) of 18 residents reviewed for accidents. R1, who is severely cognitively impaired, was assessed to be at risk for wandering/elopement upon admission to the facility. The facility implemented the use of a wander guard and R1 was placed on a secure unit on the second floor upon admission. R1 eloped from the facility on 9/30/20. R1 again eloped from the facility on 10/29/2023 around 3:28 AM. R1 was found outside the facility around 4:26 AM. When the door alarm sounded, staff did not immediately search the stairwell, even though it led to a area with an unsecured/unalarmed door to the outside. […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF684Jun 14, 2021

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility did not ensure residents received care and services consistent with professional standards of practice for 3 of 5 sampled residents (R4, R2 and R6). R4 admitted to the facility with a surgical wound of amputated toes on her right foot. The surgical site was not routinely assessed and monitored, and treatment for [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . This failure resulted in decline of the wound (infection) resulting in hospitalization for further debridement of the surgical incision and intravenous antibiotics. The facility's failure to comprehensively assess and provide treatment for [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . […]

Read 61 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 61 of 431 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jul 9, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 30, 2025Complaint4 findings
  • Sep 17, 2025Standard15 findings
  • Aug 20, 2025Complaint3 findings
  • Jul 11, 2025Complaint3 findings
  • Jun 10, 2025Complaint4 findings
  • Apr 1, 2025Complaint8 findings
  • Feb 6, 2025Complaint4 findings · 1 harm
Show the 52 earlier surveys
  • Jan 7, 2025Complaint4 findings · 1 harm
  • Oct 28, 2024Complaint3 findings
  • Sep 19, 2024Complaint10 findings · 1 harm
  • Jul 1, 2024Standard and complaint21 findings · 2 harm
  • Mar 7, 2024Complaint20 findings · 4 harm
  • Jan 17, 2024Complaint10 findings · 4 harm
  • Nov 1, 2023Complaint24 findings
  • Apr 26, 2023Standard and complaint22 findings · 1 harm
  • Mar 2, 2023Complaint4 findings
  • Dec 29, 2022Complaint15 findings · 3 harm
  • Jul 16, 2022Complaint2 findings
  • May 25, 2022Complaint9 findings · 2 harm
  • Feb 10, 2022Standard and complaint14 findings
  • Oct 27, 2021Complaint2 findings
  • Aug 3, 2021Complaint3 findings
  • Jun 14, 2021Complaint8 findings · 2 harm
  • May 11, 2021Complaint4 findings
  • Jan 12, 2021Complaint4 findings · 2 harm
  • Nov 24, 2020Infection control2 findings
  • Sep 30, 2020Complaint3 findings · 2 harm
  • Feb 26, 2020Standard and complaint17 findings · 3 harm
  • Dec 12, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 5, 2019Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Aug 15, 2019Complaint4 findings · 1 harm
  • Jun 12, 2019Complaint5 findings
  • Apr 18, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 3, 2018Standard15 findings
  • Sep 5, 2018Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Jul 2, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 25, 2018Complaint8 findings · 1 harm
  • Oct 26, 2017Standard24 findings
  • Apr 26, 2017Complaint3 findings
  • Mar 7, 2017Complaint6 findings
  • Sep 1, 2016Standard and complaint14 findings · 1 harm
  • May 4, 2016Complaint3 findings
  • Feb 11, 2016Complaint5 findings
  • Oct 8, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 26, 2015Standard and complaint20 findings · 1 harm
  • Jul 13, 2015Complaint2 findings
  • Jun 15, 2015Complaint9 findings · 2 harm
  • Jan 8, 2015Complaint4 findings · 1 harm
  • Oct 30, 2014Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Sep 17, 2014Standard and complaint15 findings · 2 harm
  • Dec 9, 2013—14 findings
  • Oct 16, 2013—1 finding
  • Jul 17, 2013—2 findings
  • Aug 30, 2012—2 findings
  • Mar 5, 2012—1 finding
  • Aug 18, 2011—4 findings
  • Jul 11, 2011—9 findings · 2 harm
  • Feb 10, 2011—4 findings
  • Aug 16, 2010—7 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction