Deficiency Index

Bradford Square Nursing and Rehabilitation Center

Frankfort, Kentucky · CCN 185170

26 surveys since 2010, 6 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
84
Surveys
26
Harm or worse
6
Immediate jeopardyall corrected before survey
2
The record, 2010–2026
’10’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy2

Findings at the most serious level CMS records. All were recorded as past non-compliance — corrected before the survey.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file22/26

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
100
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
ENCORE HEALTH PARTNERS
County
Franklin · rural
Medicare-certified since
1983

CMS ratings

Overall
3
Health inspection
3
Staffing
2
Quality measures
2

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 64 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in Kentucky.

Last survey on record

Mar 26, 2026

228 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.933.59
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.59—
Annual nurse turnover51.5%45.6%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$13,627 across 1 penalty

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ15.3%K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD1157.9%E631.6%F15.3%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 19 of the 84 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F7612×

    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.

  • F8122×

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

  • F8802×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

  • F5501×

    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.

  • F5611×

    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Bradford Square Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF624Jun 27, 2024

    Based on interview, record review, and review of the facility's documents and policies, the facility failed to provide a safe transfer to the appropriate level of care to meet a resident's needs to ensure a safe and orderly discharge from the facility for 1 out of 3 sampled residents (Resident (R) 197). Record review revealed R197 was discharged from the facility to a homeless shelter on 05/01/2023. The resident's diagnoses included type 2 diabetes with ketoacidosis (a serious complication of diabetes when too many ketones build up to dangerous levels in the body) and unspecified lack of normal physiologic development in childhood. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF802Apr 26, 2024

    Based on interview, record review, review of the facility's local health department inspection, and review of the local health department's website, the facility failed to provide education to food handlers related to safe food handling practice to enable food handlers to effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service department. This deficient practice affected 85 residents receiving meals from the kitchen. The findings include: Review of the local health department's Health Department Inspection, dated [DATE], revealed the facility was cited for improper glove use, hand hygiene, and staff needing food handlers' cards. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Sep 17, 2021

    Based on observation, interview, and review of the facility's policies, it was determined the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety as determined by observations during the initial tour and revisits to the kitchen. Staff did not use appropriate hand hygiene between glove changes, and there was improper sanitization of the utility cart and the thermometer between foods. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Hand Washing, dated 06/15/2018, revealed hand washing was performed frequently and using correct hand washing technique. The policy stated hand washing was performed after touching the body and after removing disposable gloves. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Mar 26, 2026

    Based on observation, interview, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to store food items in accordance with professional standards to prevent the use of outdated products and reduce the risk of foodborne illness.The findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled, Food brought in from Outside Sources and Personal Food Storage, dated 2019, revealed all foods should be covered, labeled, and dated. Further review revealed all foods will be checked to assure that all foods will be consumed by their safe use by dates, or frozen (where applicable), or discarded.Observation of the kitchen on 03/24/2026 at 12:25 PM revealed an opened box of Sysco baking soda with the top covered in plastic wrap, labeled as opened on 11/18/2023, with a manufacturer's best by date of… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF584Apr 26, 2024

    Based on observation, interview, and review of the facility's documents and policies, the facility failed to ensure residents had a clean environment for 46 of 46 residents who resided on the 100 and 200 Halls. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Homelike Environment, revised February 2021, stated residents were provided with a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment. Review of the facility's policy titled, Notice of Resident Rights and Responsibilities, revised March 2017, stated the resident had a right to a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment. Review of the facility's document Daily Cleaning Schedule revealed common area bathrooms and resident bathrooms were to be cleaned daily. […]

Read 24 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 24 of 84 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Mar 26, 2026Standard3 findings
  • Mar 21, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 27, 2024Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Apr 26, 2024Standard16 findings · 1 harm
  • Jan 12, 2023Complaint2 findings
  • Sep 17, 2021Standard4 findings
  • Jan 22, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 18, 2019Standard3 findings
Show the 18 earlier surveys
  • Aug 23, 2018Standard1 finding
  • Jul 27, 2017Standard5 findings
  • Jun 14, 2017Complaint2 findings
  • Feb 2, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 23, 2016Standard1 finding
  • Sep 17, 2015Standard6 findings
  • Nov 21, 2014Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 18, 2014Standard7 findings
  • Nov 15, 2013—2 findings · 2 harm
  • Sep 19, 2013—4 findings
  • Jan 18, 2013—2 findings
  • Dec 28, 2012—4 findings
  • Jun 22, 2012—1 finding
  • Dec 21, 2011—1 finding
  • Nov 18, 2011—11 findings
  • Apr 14, 2011—2 findings · 2 harm
  • Feb 17, 2011—1 finding
  • Sep 9, 2010—1 finding

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction