Deficiency Index

Boston Home, Inc (The)

Boston, Massachusetts · CCN 225434

9 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2022.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
39
Surveys
9
Harm or worse
2
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2023
’11’15’20’23
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse2

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file9/9

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
96
Ownership
Non profit - Corporation
Chain
Independent
County
Suffolk
Medicare-certified since
1990

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
5
Staffing
5
Quality measures
3

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=10, floor 20).

Last survey on record

—

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day6.104.13
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.81—
Annual nurse turnover7.4%30.8%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Boston Home, Inc (The), in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF656Feb 3, 2022

    Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1) who was assessed as being at high risk for falls, was totally dependent for care and required two staff members for bed mobility and transfers, the Facility failed to ensure staff implemented interventions from his/her plan of care related to the level of assistance he/she required with care needs. On 01/10/22, Nurse #1 repositioned Resident #1, without another staff member present to assist her. Resident #1, was in bed on an air mattress, with the head of the bed elevated, Nurse #1 attempted to reposition Resident #1 to complete a treatment. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Feb 3, 2022

    Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1) who was assessed as being at high risk for falls, was totally dependent for care and required two staff members for bed mobility and transfers, the Facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was provided with the necessary level of staff assistance during repositioning to maintain his/her safety, to prevent incident resulting in an injury. On 01/10/22, Nurse #1 attempted to reposition Resident #1 in bed by herself, to complete his/her wound care treatment. Nurse #1 did not seek assistance from another staff person for help with Resident #1, who was in bed on an air mattress, with the head of the bed elevated, and was physically unable to participate in the task. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF550Mar 3, 2023

    Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide a dignified and respectful existence by 1.) failing to respect a resident's personal room environment for 1 Resident (#45) and 2.) speaking in a language other than English while in Resident areas and while providing care in 2 of 2 units out of a sample of 20 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled 'The Fundamentals of Resident Rights-Dignity and Respect' with no revision date indicated the following: *A facility must treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF609Mar 3, 2023

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure an allegation of abuse by one Resident (#50) was reported to the Department of Public Health's (DPH) Health Care Facility Reporting Systems (HCFRS) within the required two hour time frame, out of a total 20 sampled residents. Findings include: The facility policy titled Protecting Residents from abuse, neglect and misappropriation of property, updated 11/23/22, indicated the following: * Employees of the Boston Home (TBH) will treat residents and their personal property with respect and will provide care to the resident as defined in the Resident's Care Plan. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF641Mar 3, 2023

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to accurately complete a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for 2 Resident's (#27 and #48) out of a total sample of 20 Residents. Findings include: 1. For Resident #27, the facility failed to accurately code a stage 4 (full thickness tissue loss with exposed bone, tendon or muscle. Slough or eschar may be present on some parts of the wound bed. Often includes undermining and tunneling) pressure injury on the MDS assessment. Resident #27 was admitted to to the facility in May 2016 with diagnosis including multiple sclerosis and dysphagia. […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 39 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Mar 3, 2023Standard8 findings
  • Feb 3, 2022Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
  • May 2, 2019Standard5 findings
  • Apr 10, 2018Standard11 findings
  • Feb 24, 2017Standard4 findings
  • Apr 27, 2016Standard4 findings
  • Apr 22, 2015Complaint2 findings
  • Oct 8, 2013Complaint1 finding
Show the 1 earlier survey
  • Sep 8, 2011—2 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction