Alliance Health at Marie Esther
Marlborough, Massachusetts · CCN 225619
11 surveys since 2010, 2 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 34
- Surveys
- 11
- Harm or worse
- 2
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 78
- Ownership
- Non profit - Corporation
- Chain
- ALLIANCE HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
- County
- Middlesex
- Medicare-certified since
- 1994
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 4
- Health inspection
- 4
- Staffing
- 3
- Quality measures
- 2
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=12, floor 20).
Last survey on record
Sep 5, 2025
430 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.76 | 4.13 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.64 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 61.2% | 30.8% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $7,901 across 1 penalty
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G114.3% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D571.4% | E— | F114.3% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Alliance Health at Marie Esther, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF600Sep 28, 2023
Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who had severe cognitive impairment and was dependent on staff for care, the Facility failed to ensure he/she was free from physical abuse from a staff member when on 09/09/23, Resident #1 became combative during care and Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #1 in response to Resident #1's behavior, hit Resident #1 on the top of his/her right hand, the incident was witnessed by CNA #2 and CNA #3, who were present and also assisted CNA #1 with Resident #1 at the time of the incident. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF727Sep 5, 2025
Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide the services of a Registered Nurse (RN) for at least eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week as required, placing all facility residents at risk for not having their clinical needs met either directly by the RN or indirectly by the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) or Certified Nurse's Aides (CNA) that the RN was responsible for overseeing with provision of resident care.Specifically, the facility failed to have an RN working at least eight consecutive hours over a 24-hour period on three days (8/16/25, 8/30/25, and 8/31/25). […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF727Dec 1, 2021
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to use the services of a registered nurse (RN) for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week. Findings include: Review of the actual worked schedules from 11/6/21 through 11/30/21 indicated that on 11/6/21, 11/7/21, 11/20/21, 11/21/21, and 11/25/21 there were no RNs present at the facility in a 24 hour period. During an interview on 11/30/21 at 3:07 P.M., the Staff Development Coordinator/Infection Preventionist said that she did not believe there was an RN in the facility for 8 hours every day of the week. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF695Sep 5, 2025
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that respiratory care and services consistent with professional standards of practice were provided for one Resident (#1) out of a total sample of 12 residents.Specifically, for Resident #1, the facility failed to provide portable oxygen as ordered by the Physician when the Resident was out of bed (OOB) and participating in activities away from the stationary oxygen source. Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Physician Orders, effective 11/22/16 and revised 11/14/22, include but are not limited to:>it is the policy of the facility that a physician personally approves in writing a recommendation that an individual be admitted to the facility. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF761Sep 5, 2025
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that medications were stored in a safe and secure manner for one Resident (#22) out of a total sample of 12 residents.Specifically, for Resident #22, the facility failed to ensure that:-One over-the-counter medication was secured and was not left at the Resident's bedside table and readily accessible to other residents on the unit.-One prescribed medication was secured and was not left at the Resident's bedside table and readily accessible to other residents on the unit.- A Physician's order was obtained for the use of one over-the-counter and one prescribed medication.- A self-assessment of medication was completed to ensure the Resident was capable of self-administering medications. […]
Read 21 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 21 of 34 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Sep 5, 2025Standard5 findings
- Sep 28, 2023Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Apr 14, 2023Standard1 finding
- Dec 1, 2021Standard5 findings
- Dec 14, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Jun 17, 2019Standard6 findings
- Apr 6, 2018Standard5 findings
- Jan 24, 2017Standard3 findings
Show the 3 earlier surveys
- Oct 6, 2015Standard3 findings
- Jun 30, 2011—3 findings
- Nov 2, 2010—1 finding · 1 harm
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction