Deficiency Index

Boro Park Center for Rehabilitation and Healthcare

Brooklyn, New York · CCN 335470

16 surveys since 2011, 4 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
53
Surveys
16
Harm or worse
4
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2024
’11’15’20’24
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse4

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file13/16

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
510
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
CENTERS HEALTH CARE
County
Kings
Medicare-certified since
1976

CMS ratings

Overall
2
Health inspection
2
Staffing
3
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 259 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in New York.

Last survey on record

May 6, 2024

917 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.653.37
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.67—
Annual nurse turnover20.0%33.3%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD1372.2%E422.2%F15.6%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 18 of the 53 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F8123×

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

  • F5771×

    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.

  • F5821×

    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.

  • F6041×

    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.

  • F6371×

    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Boro Park Center for Rehabilitation and Healthcare, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Apr 21, 2022

    Based on observation, record review, and interview conducted during the Recertification and Complaint (NY 418) survey, the facility did not ensure a resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents. This was evident for 1 out of 6 residents reviewed out of a sample of 35 (Resident #253). Specifically, Resident #253 required the assistance of 2 people for Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and sustained a left leg tibia/fibula fracture when Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) #5 attempted to turn Resident #253 in the bed without assistance from a 2nd staff member. This resulted in actual harm to Resident #253 who sustained a left leg tibia/fibula fracture that was not immediate jeopardy. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Feb 2, 2022

    [NAME] Park Center for Rehabilitation & Healthcare F689 S/S G Exit date: 02/10/2022 Due Date: 02/25/2022 RO:NYC/Jean [NAME] Based on observation, interviews and record review conducted during an abbreviated survey (NY 289) on 01/21/2022, the facility failed to ensure that the environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible and that each reach resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 (Resident #1) out of 3 residents reviewed. Specifically, on 10/22/2021, Resident #1 was given a microwaved bowl of soup by Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #1. Resident #1 was transporting the reheated soup back to his/her room while self-propelling the wheelchair. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Mar 9, 2021

    Based on observation, record review, and interviews, during a Complaints Investigation Survey (Complaint #NY00272142), the facility did not ensure food was stored in accordance with professional standards for food service safety to prevent the spread of potential foodborne illness. Specifically, two pans of frozen plastic sealed raw fish were stored on the top rack above a box of frozen vegetables in walk-in freezer number 4. This was evident for 1 of 2 walk-in freezers and in 0 of 6 walk-in refrigerators observed during the kitchen tour (Walk-in Freezer #4). The finding is: The facility policy and procedure titled, Food Storage Policy (Dated 02/25/2021) documented frozen fish should be stored on lower shelves which vegetables are stored on the upper shelves. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF577May 6, 2024

    Based on observations, record review, and staff interviews conducted during the Recertification survey from 04/20/2024 to 05/06/2024, the facility did not ensure that the survey results were posted in a place readily accessible to residents, visitors, or legal representatives where individuals wishing to examine survey results do not have to ask to see them. In addition, notices of the availability of such reports were not posted in areas of the facility that are prominent and accessible to the public. Specifically, the survey results were located inside a binder placed behind the Security desk, and there were only two notices posted about the availability of the survey results, and the notices which were not in conspicuous locations. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF761May 6, 2024

    Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during the Recertification survey from [DATE] to [DATE], the facility did not ensure medications and biologicals were stored in accordance with currently accepted professional principles and expiration date, if applicable. This was evident for 2 of 16 medication storage areas (2 East medication room and 2 [NAME] Unit medical supply room). Specifically, 13 bags of expired intravenous fluids were observed in the medication room on unit 2 East, and 12 bags of expired intravenous fluids were observed in the medical supply closet on 2 West. This was evident for the Medication Storage task. […]

Read 22 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 22 of 53 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • May 6, 2024Standard6 findings
  • Apr 21, 2022Standard and complaint13 findings · 1 harm
  • Feb 2, 2022Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Mar 9, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 16, 2020Infection control2 findings
  • Jul 26, 2019Standard and complaint2 findings
  • Mar 13, 2019Complaint2 findings
  • Dec 6, 2017Complaint6 findings · 1 harm
Show the 8 earlier surveys
  • Sep 18, 2017Standard1 finding
  • May 21, 2015Standard2 findings
  • May 14, 2014Standard2 findings
  • May 3, 2013—4 findings
  • Apr 16, 2013—1 finding
  • Dec 13, 2012—1 finding
  • Apr 30, 2012—5 findings · 1 harm
  • Apr 8, 2011—4 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction