Deficiency Index

Bonita Hills Post Acute

La Habra, California · CCN 055622

40 surveys since 2011, 2 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
257
Surveys
40
Harm or worse
2
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse2

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file25/40

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
86
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
DAVID JOHNSON
County
Orange
Medicare-certified since
1976

CMS ratings

Overall
3
Health inspection
2
Staffing
3
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 423 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in California.

Last survey on record

Jan 28, 2026

285 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.284.16
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.48—
Annual nurse turnover39.2%37.5%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD6875.6%E44.4%F22.2%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B1617.8%C—
CMS’s current file: 90 of the 257 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6847×

    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

  • F6894×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

  • F8424×

    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.

  • F8804×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

  • F6573×

    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Bonita Hills Post Acute, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Jan 14, 2022

    Based on observation, interview, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the sanitary requirements were met in the kitchen. * The facility failed to ensure proper labeling and dating of food items in the kitchen, dry storage, and refrigerator. * The facility failed to ensure proper storage of the employees' food in the kitchen. * The facility failed to ensure the kitchen equipment and utensils were clean. * The facility failed to ensure the cutting boards were in sanitary condition. * The facility failed to ensure the resident dishware had a smooth cleanable surface. * The facility failed to air dry the dietary equipment. * The facility failed to ensure the employee personal items were not stored in the food preparation area. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF842Jan 14, 2022

    Based on observation, interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure the medical records for four of 12 final sampled residents (Residents 2, 18, 19, and 45) and 25 nonsampled residents (Residents 3, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11, 13, 15, 16, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 30, 31, 32, 34, 35, 36, 42 and 43) were complete. * The facility failed to ensure RNA treatment records were complete and accurate for Residents 2, 3, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11, 13, 15, 16, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 30, 31, 32, 34, 35, 36, 42, 43, and 45 receiving RNA services for the months of November, December 2021, and January 2022. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Aug 11, 2025

    Based on observation, interview, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the food safety and sanitation guidelines were followed in the kitchen when: * Pasteurized eggs were not available for one resident (Resident 62) who requested fried over easy eggs daily with breakfast. * Four fry pans were not clean and had excessively worn surfaces.* Three steam table pans were stacked and stored wet.* One food prep sink did not have a backflow prevention. * Four cereal bins were outdated. These failures had the potential to cause food borne illnesses in a highly susceptible resident population who received food prepared in the facility kitchen. Findings: Review of the facility's matrix dated 8/5/25, showed 62 residents were on an oral diet. 1. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Jul 12, 2024

    Based on observation, interview, facility document review and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the food safety and sanitation guidelines were followed when: 1. The kitchen equipment were not air dried before storage. 2. The cutting boards were not kept in sanitary condition and with cleanable surfaces. 3. A thawing process was not followed for meats. 4. The ice machine ice storage bin's splash guard and outside left area of ice machine were not clean. These failures posed the risk for food borne illnesses in highly susceptible resident population of 75 facility residents who received food prepared in the kitchen. Findings: Review of the facility matrix showed 75 of 77 residents consumed food prepared in the kitchen. 1. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF761Jan 14, 2022

    Based on observation, interview, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to store the drugs and biologicals in a safe manner. * An expired bottle of [MEDICATION(S)] oral concentrate (medication for anxiety) was observed in Medication Cart 1. In addition, a bottle of [MEDICATION(S)] oral solution was stored in the medication drawer and not refrigerated as per the manufacturer's instruction. * Multiple expired, unlabeled medications with no open dates were observed in Treatment Cart 1. * Multiple expired medications were observed in Medication Cart 2. […]

Read 22 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 22 of 257 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jan 28, 2026Complaint2 findings
  • Oct 22, 2025Complaint2 findings
  • Aug 11, 2025Standard27 findings
  • Jul 1, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 5, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 17, 2025Complaint2 findings
  • Nov 20, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 10, 2024Complaint3 findings
Show the 32 earlier surveys
  • Sep 26, 2024Complaint8 findings
  • Aug 29, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 12, 2024Standard16 findings
  • Mar 5, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 7, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 28, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 14, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 6, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 14, 2022Standard23 findings
  • Dec 6, 2019Standard17 findings
  • Sep 6, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 13, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 5, 2018Standard20 findings
  • Mar 6, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 18, 2017Standard15 findings
  • Oct 30, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 29, 2017Complaint2 findings
  • Aug 16, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 16, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 20, 2017Standard21 findings
  • Mar 3, 2016Standard13 findings
  • Aug 5, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • May 11, 2015Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Feb 20, 2015Standard13 findings
  • Oct 6, 2014Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 8, 2014Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 21, 2014Standard17 findings
  • Nov 21, 2013—1 finding · 1 harm
  • May 30, 2013—13 findings
  • Jan 14, 2013—3 findings
  • Jul 2, 2012—10 findings
  • Mar 10, 2011—9 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction