Bishop Drumm Retirement Center
Johnston, Iowa · CCN 165448
40 surveys since 2011, 17 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 177
- Surveys
- 40
- Harm or worse
- 17
- Immediate jeopardy
- 8
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 150
- Ownership
- Non profit - Church related
- Chain
- COMMONSPIRIT HEALTH
- County
- Polk
- Medicare-certified since
- 2002
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 1
- Health inspection
- 1
- Staffing
- 4
- Quality measures
- 3
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 168 not-for-profit facilities in Iowa.
Last survey on record
Jun 11, 2026
151 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.64 | 3.85 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.81 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 34.9% | 38.7% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $258,177 across 4 penalties
- Payment denials
- 3
- Special focus
- SFF Candidate
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J33.6% | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G67.2% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D5161.4% | E1720.5% | F56.0% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C11.2% |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F7258×
Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
- F8808×
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
- F6847×
Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
- F6897×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
- F5504×
Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Bishop Drumm Retirement Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF686Aug 18, 2024
Based on clinical record review, resident and staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to prevent the development of a pressure ulcer for 1 of 3 (Resident #1) residents reviewed. The resident was admitted with one Stage IV pressure ulcer, having comorbidities which made her susceptible to further impaired skin integrity. The facility failed to provide recommended every 2 hour repositioning, and failed to do all ordered skin treatments. This failure resulted in Immediate Jeopardy to the health and safety of the resident when she developed a second stage IV pressure ulcer, which required multiple antibiotics and medical intervention during a hospital. The facility reported a census of 119 residents. […]
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF686Feb 27, 2024
Based on observations, clinical record review, staff interviews, provider interviews and facility policy review the facility failed to provide skin assessments per policy and provide treatments per physician's orders to prevent the development and worsening of a facility acquired pressure ulcer which required the physician to complete a debridement of a Stage IV pressure ulcer to the coccyx for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #11) reviewed for pressure ulcers. There was an immediate need for the facility to take steps to ensure residents were protected from risk of development or worsening of wounds. The facility reported a census of 110 residents. […]
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF760Aug 8, 2023
Based on staff interview, pharmacist interview, physician interview, clinical record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to prevent significant medication errors which included: Staff A, LPN crushed morphine extended release medication 90 milligrams (mg) and administered it to Resident #1. The facility also administered 16 mg of Dexamethasone (steroid) instead of 4 mg as ordered for Resident #2. Additionally, Resident #3 received a narcotic medication on an as needed dose without an order. On 8/2/23 at 1:30 PM, the State Agency (SA) notified the Administrator and Director of Nursing (DON) of the Immediate Jeopardy of F 760 significant medication error. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF686Sep 17, 2025
Based on clinical record reviews, hospital clinical record review, hospital images, staff interviews and policy review the facility failed to identify a resident with a pressure ulcer/injury and to assure the resident received treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing of an unstageable pressure ulcer/injury for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #10). The facility reported a census of 114 residents.Finding include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment identifies the definition of pressure ulcers:Stage I is an intact skin with non-blanchable redness of a localized area usually over a bony prominence. Darkly pigmented skin may not have a visible blanching; in dark skin tones only it may appear with persistent blue or purple hues. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF688Jul 21, 2025
Based on record review, observations, and family and staff interviews, the facility failed to carry out therapy recommendations and provide restorative exercises for 1of 4 residents reviewed for rehabilitation services and/or limited range of motion (Resident #10). The facility reported a census of 107 residents. Findings include:The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #10 had diagnoses of dementia, mild intellectual disability, and failure to thrive. The MDS documented the resident required set-up assistance for eating, partial to maximum assistance for bed mobility, and had dependence on staff for transfers and toileting. The MDS indicated the resident's upper and lower extremity range of motion (ROM) not impaired. […]
Read 36 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 36 of 177 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Aug 13, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Jun 11, 2026Complaint6 findings
- Feb 18, 2026Complaint10 findings
- Sep 17, 2025Complaint8 findings · 1 harm
- Jul 21, 2025Standard and complaint9 findings · 1 harm
- May 29, 2025Complaint2 findings
- Apr 3, 2025Complaint4 findings · 2 harm
- Sep 19, 2024Standard and complaint4 findings · 1 harm
Show the 32 earlier surveys
- Aug 18, 2024Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Jun 27, 2024Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
- May 3, 2024Complaint3 findings
- Feb 27, 2024Complaint6 findings · 1 harm
- Jan 10, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Oct 9, 2023Complaint5 findings
- Aug 8, 2023Complaint4 findings · 1 harm
- Jun 29, 2023Standard and complaint17 findings
- Aug 18, 2022Complaint2 findings
- May 19, 2022Standard and complaint7 findings
- Feb 24, 2021Standard and complaint15 findings
- Mar 7, 2019Standard and complaint4 findings
- Dec 13, 2018Complaint2 findings
- Oct 1, 2018Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Feb 15, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Nov 16, 2017Standard2 findings
- Apr 26, 2017Complaint7 findings · 1 harm
- Dec 20, 2016Complaint1 finding
- Nov 10, 2016Complaint4 findings · 1 harm
- Oct 27, 2016Standard and complaint3 findings
- Sep 15, 2016Complaint1 finding
- Dec 7, 2015Standard and complaint7 findings
- Mar 26, 2015Complaint2 findings
- Nov 6, 2014Standard4 findings
- Oct 20, 2014Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Sep 23, 2013—1 finding · 1 harm
- Aug 1, 2013—5 findings
- Jun 17, 2013—2 findings · 1 harm
- May 8, 2013—2 findings
- Jul 17, 2012—8 findings · 1 harm
- Jan 12, 2012—2 findings · 1 harm
- May 12, 2011—9 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction