Deficiency Index

Birchwood Care Home

Minneapolis, Minnesota · CCN 24E166

26 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2019.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
101
Surveys
26
Harm or worse
3
Immediate jeopardy
2
The record, 2011–2025
’11’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy2

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file19/26

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
60
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
Independent
County
Hennepin
Medicare-certified since
1974

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
4
Staffing
3
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 55 for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in Minnesota.

Last survey on record

Jul 29, 2025

468 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day1.943.62
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.44—
Annual nurse turnover37.5%50.0%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG13.2%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD1858.1%E619.4%F412.9%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C26.5%
CMS’s current file: 31 of the 101 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6894×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

  • F5852×

    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.

  • F6412×

    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.

  • F6562×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

  • F5671×

    Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Birchwood Care Home, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Feb 28, 2023

    Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to reassess and implement appropriate interventions in place for 2 of 2 residents (R1, R2) with a history of elopement. This resulted in an immediate jeopardy (IJ), substandard quality of care, when R1 and R2 left the facility property unsupervised and without staff awareness. The IJ began on 2/12/23, when the facility noted R1 and R2 had left the facility unsupervised. Further, R1 and R2 were not comprehensively reassessed with appropriate interventions developed to provide adequate safety after previous exit seeking behaviors. On 2/22/23, at 5:20 p.m. the director of nursing was notified of the IJ for R1 and R2. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF760Jul 3, 2024

    Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure one of three residents (R2) reviewed was free from significant medication errors. This resulted in actual harm for R2 when he became heavily sedated by a psychotropic medication and required treatment in the hospital. Findings include: Minimum Data Set (MDS) admission assessment dated [DATE] indicated R1 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R1's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) had a score of 15, indicating she was cognitively intact. R1's relevant diagnoses included schizoid personality disorder, borderline intellectual functioning, and unspecified urinary incontinence. R1's medication order, dated 6/9/22, indicated R1 received clozapine 600 milligrams (mg) by mouth at 8:00 p.m. nightly for schizophrenia. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Mar 20, 2025

    Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure food items were properly stored, labeled, and dated to reduce the risk of physical cross-contamination and potential foodborne illness. This had the potential to affect all 59 residents, staff, and visitors who consumed food from the kitchen. Findings include: On 3/17/25 at 12:11 p.m., an initial kitchen tour was completed with dietary aid (DA)-A. In the walking refrigerator a sheet pan cart with several unwrapped and undated trays contained the following items: * Three trays with about 20 cheese and eggs English muffin sandwiches with a piece of parchment paper on top * Two trays with tater tots with a piece of parchment paper on top * Two trays with apple bran bowls, each containing about 35 bowls with a… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF865May 3, 2024

    Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to conduct ongoing quality assessment and assurance activities, develop, and implement appropriate plans of action to correct repeated quality deficiencies identified during the survey the facility was aware of or should have been aware of which had the potential to adversely affect all 60 residents which resided in the facility. Findings include: The facility's QAPI meeting minutes for the past 12 months were requested, however not received. Documentation and evidence of the facility's ongoing performance improvement projects (PIPs) was requested, however not received. Documentation and evidence of a recent performance improvement plan (PIP) was requested, however was not received. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF867May 3, 2024

    Based on document review and interview, the facility failed to maintain a Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee that was effective in identifying and responding to quality deficiencies, and developing procedures for feedback, data collection and monitoring systems. In addition, the facility failed to provide evidence of a Performance Improvement Project (PIP) which focused on high risk or problem-prone areas. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 60 residents currently residing in the facility. Findings include: Quality tracking data was requested from the facility but was not provided. […]

Read 22 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 22 of 101 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jul 29, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 20, 2025Standard6 findings
  • Jul 3, 2024Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Jun 18, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • May 3, 2024Standard and complaint17 findings
  • Mar 22, 2024Complaint3 findings
  • Mar 15, 2024Complaint2 findings
  • Jun 8, 2023Complaint1 finding
Show the 18 earlier surveys
  • Feb 28, 2023Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Jan 26, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 20, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 10, 2022Complaint6 findings
  • Jun 9, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 2, 2022Standard7 findings
  • Nov 15, 2021Complaint2 findings
  • Apr 29, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Nov 27, 2019Complaint4 findings · 1 harm
  • Jan 16, 2019Standard6 findings
  • Nov 2, 2017Standard4 findings
  • Jan 10, 2017Standard7 findings
  • Feb 24, 2016Standard6 findings
  • Jan 8, 2015Standard11 findings
  • Apr 23, 2014Standard4 findings
  • Jul 18, 2013—1 finding
  • Apr 26, 2012—3 findings
  • May 25, 2011—3 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction