Deficiency Index

Bethany Home

Waupaca, Wisconsin · CCN 525538

27 surveys since 2010. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2015.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
103
Surveys
27
Harm or worse
7
Immediate jeopardy
2
The record, 2010–2025
’10’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy2

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file23/27

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
100
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
Independent
County
Waupaca · rural
Medicare-certified since
1994

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
4
Staffing
4
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 39 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in Wisconsin.

Last survey on record

Oct 27, 2025

378 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.523.64
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.80—
Annual nurse turnover73.7%50.0%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG110.0%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD880.0%E110.0%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 10 of the 103 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Bethany Home, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, widespreadF812Mar 7, 2022

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not follow proper sanitation in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This had the potential to affect all 67 residents. The facility did not consistently check temperatures of facility warewashing machines and failed to [MEDICATION(S)] when temperatures were below minimum wash and rinse temperatures specified for proper sanitization of dishes. Additionally, on 2/23/22, the facility identified an outbreak of Gastrointestinal Illness with the first case that began on 2/19/22. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Oct 27, 2025

    Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure the resident environment was as free of accident hazards as possible for 1 Resident (R) (R1) of 3 sampled residents. R1 required an EZ stand mechanical lift with the assistance of 2 staff for transfers. On 9/25/25, R1 slipped from the EZ stand, was lowered to the floor, and suffered a left clavicle fracture when agency Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)-C transferred R1 alone. In addition, agency Registered Nurse (RN)-D did not transfer R1 to the emergency room (ER) per R1's request because RN-D did not know how to complete the paperwork. The facility identified deficient practices but did not provide education to agency staff who worked since the incident. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF686Apr 8, 2021

    Based on observations, record review and staff interviews, the facility did not ensure each resident received necessary treatment to prevent and heal pressure injuries for 5 Residents (R) (R15, R64, R19, R14, and R5) of 18 sampled residents. R15 was admitted to the facility without a pressure injury (PI) and was identified to be at risk for development of pressure injuries. The facility identified that R15 developed avoidable bilateral (affecting both sides) heel Stage 2 PIs on 2/23/2021 that deteriorated. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF867Apr 8, 2021

    Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility did not identify issues to which quality assessment and assurance activities are necessary, or develop and implement appropriate plans of action to correct identified quality deficiencies. This was evidenced by the number of facility acquired pressure injuries, which affected 5 Residents (R) ( R15, R64, R19, R14, and R5) who were at risk for PIs and who developed facility-acquired PIs. The facility's Quality Assurance & Performance Improvement Plan (QAPI), dated 7/9/15 and reviewed yearly with the latest review date of 3/25/21, includes, in part: Purpose Statement: The purpose of QAPI in our organization is to take a proactive approach to continually improving the way we care for and engage with our clients, caregiver,… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880Apr 8, 2021

    Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure their infection control program included a system of surveillance designed to identify infections and prevent the spread of infections such as COVID-19. This had the potential to affect all 78 residents in the facility. The facility did not have a process in place to ensure visitors entering the facility were properly screened by staff members. Surveyors entered the building and had to seek out staff members who were working the unit to screen the Surveyors when they entered the building. Education on visitor requirements was sent to resident representatives by email with no way to verify if resident representative received the education. […]

Read 23 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 23 of 103 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Oct 27, 2025Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • May 21, 2025Standard3 findings
  • Sep 30, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 17, 2024Standard4 findings
  • Mar 7, 2022Standard3 findings · 1 harm
  • Sep 16, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 8, 2021Standard8 findings · 2 harm
  • Jan 12, 2021Complaint2 findings
Show the 19 earlier surveys
  • Sep 3, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 5, 2020Standard4 findings
  • Feb 10, 2020Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Apr 25, 2019Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Mar 19, 2019Standard5 findings
  • Jan 25, 2019Complaint3 findings
  • Apr 20, 2018Standard5 findings
  • Feb 27, 2018Complaint3 findings
  • Jul 12, 2017Complaint3 findings
  • Mar 16, 2017Standard and complaint7 findings
  • Feb 2, 2016Standard4 findings
  • Oct 23, 2015Complaint4 findings · 1 harm
  • Jan 8, 2015Standard4 findings
  • Jan 8, 2014—6 findings
  • Jan 9, 2013—1 finding
  • Oct 23, 2012—7 findings
  • Oct 14, 2011—6 findings
  • Feb 8, 2011—1 finding
  • Aug 30, 2010—11 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction