Deficiency Index

Belknap County Nursing Home

Laconia, New Hampshire · CCN 305101

13 surveys since 2010, 3 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
40
Surveys
13
Harm or worse
3
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2010–2025
’10’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse3

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file11/13

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
94
Ownership
Government - County
Chain
Independent
County
Belknap · rural
Medicare-certified since
2008

CMS ratings

Overall
4
Health inspection
4
Staffing
5
Quality measures
1

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=11, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Sep 4, 2025

431 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.964.74
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.80—
Annual nurse turnover31.9%44.6%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD375.0%E—F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B125.0%C—
CMS’s current file: 4 of the 40 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Belknap County Nursing Home, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF658Sep 4, 2025

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to follow professional standards for 1 of 1 resident observed for medication administration via gastrostomy tube (g-tube) (Resident identifier is #2).Findings include:Review on 9/4/25 of [NAME] A. [NAME] and [NAME], Clinical Nursing Skills & Techniques. 10th ed. St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier, 2022. revealed on Page 617-Administering Medications Through Feeding Tube 12.b. To administer more than one medication, give each separately and flush between medications with 15ml [milliliter] to 30ml of water.Observation on 9/3/2025 at approximately 8:45 a.m. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF880Sep 4, 2025

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to implement infection control policies and procedures for hand hygiene and glove for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for skin condition in a final sample of 15 residents. (Resident identifier is #33).Findings include:Review on 9/4/25 of Resident #33's physician's order dated 7/2/25 revealed a wound treatment for the right buttocks to gently cleanse area with wound wash, pat dry, apply non-sting barrier wipe, apply santyl to wound bed and cover with small Mepilex border (3x3), change dressing daily.Observation on 9/4/25 at 10:30 a.m. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF908Sep 19, 2024

    Based on interview, observation, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to follow manufacturer's instructions for care and cleaning of the Hydrocollator. Findings include: Review on 9/19/24 of the manufacturer's instructions for the Hydrocollator, undated revealed: .Care and cleaning: .Water is constantly lost during operation due to evaporation. Therefore, it is essential that water be added daily. The tank should also be drained and cleaned systematically, at a minimum interval of every two weeks . Observation on 9/19/24 at approximately 9:00 a.m. in the rehab department revealed that there was a hydrocollator. Interview on 9/19/24 at approximately 9:00 a.m. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF658Aug 25, 2022

    Based on observation, interview, and policy review it was determined that the facility failed to insure the storage of expired needles, culture swabs, dressings, and syringes according to professional standards for 2 out of 2 medication rooms and 2 out of 2 treatment carts reviewed for storage of medical supplies. Findings include: Observation on [DATE] at 8:45 a.m. of the East Wing medication room with Staff B (RN Unit Manager) revealed the following: -Ten blue cap culture swabs containing liquid medium with manufacturer's expiration date of [DATE] -Nine red cap culture swabs containing liquid medium with manufacturer's expiration date of [DATE] -Four individual needles with a manufacturer's expiration date of ,d+[DATE]. Observation on [DATE] at 8:50 a.m. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF761Aug 25, 2022

    Based on observation, interview, and policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that expired medications, were not kept longer than the manufacturer's or supplier guidelines, for 1 out of 2 medication rooms and 1 out of 2 treatment carts observed for medication storage. Findings include: Observation on 8/23/22 at 9:00 a.m. of the Ease Wing Treatment cart with Staff B (Registered Nurse) revealed two (2) open bottles of Vashe Wound Solution 4 oz (ounces) one with a manufacturer's expiration date of 3/2022 and one with a manufacturer's expiration date on 1/2022. Further observation revealed an unopened bottle of Mineral Oil Lubricant [MEDICATION(S)] with manufacturer's expiration date of 8/2021. Interview on 8/23/22 at 9:00 a.m. […]

Read 23 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 23 of 40 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Sep 4, 2025Standard2 findings
  • Sep 19, 2024Standard2 findings
  • Aug 25, 2022Standard3 findings
  • Jul 9, 2021Standard4 findings
  • Dec 6, 2019Standard4 findings
  • Oct 5, 2018Standard5 findings
  • Dec 14, 2017Standard5 findings
  • Oct 26, 2016Standard2 findings
Show the 5 earlier surveys
  • Dec 9, 2015Standard and complaint1 finding
  • Nov 7, 2013—3 findings
  • Jan 4, 2013—2 findings
  • Jun 21, 2011—3 findings
  • Nov 3, 2010—4 findings · 3 harm

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction