Bayview Center

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Bayview Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

• Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF600Apr 15, 2022

  Based on interview, record review, and policy and procedure review, the facility failed to ensure the residents were free from medical neglect when an unidentified third party contracted individual presented to the facility and without being identified, the facility could not verify the individual was licensed and had an eligible level II background screening. Findings include: Review of the facility roster for the agency staff working at the facility documented the name [Staff A's name], previously a person of interest, who worked on [DATE] at 2:45 PM through [DATE] at 7:15 AM. […]

• Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF835Apr 15, 2022

  Based on interview and record review, the facility administration failed to administer the facility in a manner to effectively and efficiently attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident when an unidentified third party contracted individual presented to the facility and without being identified, the facility could not verify the individual was licensed and had an eligible level II background screening. Findings include: Review of the job description titled, Administrator reads: Job Code: ,d+[DATE]. Reports to: Regional Vice President. Overview: The Administrator administers, directs and coordinates all functions of the facility to assure that the highest degree of quality of care is consistently provided to the patients. […]

• Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF839Apr 15, 2022

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the licensure qualifications for third party contracted staff presenting to the facility through identification verification when an unidentified third party contracted individual presented to the facility and without being identified, the facility could not verify the individual was licensed and had an eligible level II background screening. Findings include: Review of the facility roster for the agency staff working at the facility documented the name [Staff A's name], previously a person of interest, who worked on [DATE] at 2:45 PM through [DATE] at 7:15 AM. […]

• No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Apr 15, 2022

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food safety storage for labeling in the kitchen walk-in cooler, failed to prevent ice build-up of the freezer exterior door, and failed to ensure a thermometer was inside the reach in cooler to verify safe food storage temperatures. Findings: During an observation on 04/11/2022 beginning at 9:46 AM of the kitchen with the Registered Dietician (RD) the walk-in cooler had six large clear containers with what appeared to be ground meat, fruit and vegetables. The containers did not have an identifying label of the contents and the use-by dates. The walk-in cooler had a door that entered into the walk-in freezer. The door to the freezer had a build-up of ice on the exterior of the door. […]

• No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812May 14, 2026

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored in a safe and sanitary manner in the main kitchen and 2 of 2 nourishment areas.Findings include:During an observation on 5/11/2026 at 10:00 AM, there was one Styrofoam container with unidentified food item on a shelf in the walk-in kitchen refrigerator. The container had no label or date.During an interview on 5/11/2026 at 10:05 AM, the Certified Dietary Manager stated that the food belonged to an employee, and it should not be there.During an observation of the first-floor nourishment room on 5/11/2026 at 10:10 AM, there was one container of Almond milk with no label or date in the refrigerator, and one griddle wrapped sandwich with no label or date in the freezer.During an interview on… […]