Deficiency Index

Venice Health and Rehabilitation Center

Venice, Florida · CCN 105497

23 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2023.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
79
Surveys
23
Harm or worse
3
Immediate jeopardyall corrected before survey
2
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy2

Findings at the most serious level CMS records. All were recorded as past non-compliance — corrected before the survey.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file18/23

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
120
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
SIMCHA HYMAN & NAFTALI ZANZIPER
County
Sarasota
Medicare-certified since
1985

CMS ratings

Overall
2
Health inspection
2
Staffing
3
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 293 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in Florida.

Last survey on record

May 14, 2026

179 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.673.57
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.63—
Annual nurse turnover49.6%44.5%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$16,984 across 2 penalties

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ28.7%K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD1252.2%E626.1%F313.0%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 23 of the 79 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F7612×

    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.

  • F8122×

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

  • F5821×

    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.

  • F5841×

    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.

  • F6001×

    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Venice Health and Rehabilitation Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF600Jul 10, 2025

    Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to protect residents' right to be free from neglect by failing to ensure staff consistently provide safe nursing care to prevent avoidable accidents and serious physical harm for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 dependent residents reviewed.Resident #1 had a history of cerebral infarction (stroke) with resultant hemiplegia (paralysis) of his right dominant side and was dependent on the assistance of 2 staff for bed mobility.On 6/19/25 the Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) chose to not follow safety precautions of 2 staff assistance listed on the care plan to provide incontinent care, causing Resident #1 to fall out of bed.Resident #1 sustained a serious head injury from the avoidable fall, requiring an emergency transfer to an acute care… […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Jul 10, 2025

    Based on record review, review of facility's policy and procedure, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure effective processes were in place to protect 1 (Resident #1) of 3 residents reviewed from avoidable fall and fall related major injury.Resident #1 had a history of cerebral infarction (stroke) with resultant hemiplegia (paralysis) of his right dominant side and was dependent on the assistance of 2 staff for bed mobility.On 6/19/25 the Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) chose to not follow safety precautions of 2 staff assistance listed on the care plan to provide incontinent care, causing Resident #1 to fall out of bed.Resident #1 sustained a serious head injury from the avoidable fall, requiring an emergency transfer to an acute care hospital for evaluation and… […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Jun 7, 2023

    Based on a review of facility policy and procedures, record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to accurately assess and reassess risk factors and provide necessary supervision and assistance to prevent falls, for 1 (Resident #4) of 3 residents reviewed who were identified as being at risk for falls and sustained multiple falls at the facility, including a fall with injury requiring the resident's transfer to a higher level of care. The findings included: A review of the facility policy and procedure, Falls Prevention program, stated that each Resident will be assessed for fall risk and will receive care and services in accordance with their individualized level of risk to minimize the likelihood of falls. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF803May 14, 2026

    Based on observation, record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to have menus that were prepared in advance and reviewed by a dietitian or other clinically qualified nutrition professional for nutritional adequacy.The findings included: On 5/11/26 at 9:15 a.m., upon request, the Certified Dietary Manager provided the facility's menu for the week of May 10, 2026, through May 16, 2026. There was no documentation that the menu was reviewed by a dietitian. In an interview, the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) said that she was only able to supply a menu for the current week and verified that the menu was not signed by a dietitian. The CDM said that the facility's contract with a food management company ended a few weeks ago and the company pulled everything from the kitchen. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812May 14, 2026

    Based on observation and staff interviews, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety.The findings included:On 5/11/26 at 9:09 a.m., observation of the kitchen with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) revealed the following:The temperature log for the reach-in refrigerator noted April 2026 under Location name. The log did not have a temperature documented for 5/11/26 at 5:00 a.m. On 5/11/26 at 9:12 a.m., observation of the reach-in refrigerator revealed 8 unlabeled filled beverage pitchers.On 5/11/26 at 9:15 a.m., upon request of facility's policy for storing and labeling food, the CDM said that the facility did not have dietary policies and procedures. […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 79 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • May 14, 2026Standard4 findings
  • Jul 10, 2025Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
  • Mar 21, 2024Standard4 findings
  • Jun 7, 2023Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • May 25, 2022Infection control1 finding
  • Apr 28, 2022Standard and complaint9 findings
  • May 24, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 21, 2020Standard4 findings
Show the 15 earlier surveys
  • Feb 28, 2019Standard5 findings
  • Jan 26, 2018Standard2 findings
  • Oct 3, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 9, 2017Standard and complaint5 findings
  • Sep 12, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 4, 2016Standard and complaint5 findings
  • Oct 14, 2015Complaint2 findings
  • Jul 23, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 9, 2015Complaint3 findings
  • Jan 8, 2015Standard4 findings
  • Sep 18, 2014Complaint2 findings
  • Jan 9, 2014—5 findings
  • Mar 1, 2013—6 findings
  • Mar 16, 2012—5 findings
  • Mar 4, 2011—5 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction